VinnyVeritas
Libertarian Sage
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2022
- Posts
- 2,842
Somebody didn't even bother to read the article.
Nothing says stupid is like stupid does.
Nothing says stupid is like stupid does.
Wat's Guns-N-Stuff Thread
- Thread starter Wat_Tyler
- Start date
- Status
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 66,496
I was responding directly to the quote your provided, which alludes to the points of view in stark opposition.
Last edited:
VinnyVeritas
Libertarian Sage
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2022
- Posts
- 2,842
Somebody just proved they didn't read, they just had a knee-jerk reaction...
"OH! 𝕏______ is posting! I have to get on the snark quick, fast and in a hurry!"
"OH! 𝕏______ is posting! I have to get on the snark quick, fast and in a hurry!"
Sure it was, are you claiming Hitler was honest or a saint...gmafb.
ll74
Your Best Friend
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Posts
- 66,496
Well, the article doesn't give the details of the questions. But it does hit on a salient point. I, and virtually everyone I know, would not participate in such a poll and if cornered would lie about ownership. The distrust of the media and government has really reached that level.
Me? I would like to see the laws that are on the books concerning the use of firearms in the commission of a crime enforced. That would be a good start. If I could figure out a way to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill that wouldn't be abused by the government, I would support such laws.
Me? I would like to see the laws that are on the books concerning the use of firearms in the commission of a crime enforced. That would be a good start. If I could figure out a way to keep firearms out of the hands of the mentally ill that wouldn't be abused by the government, I would support such laws.
Wat_Tyler
Allah's Favorite
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2004
- Posts
- 68,922
Indeed. I discussed my distrust of them for years and then again...,
... they are a great trigger feature.
Especially polls about firearms, which all have triggers.
Gotta pick all the low-hanging fruit . . . .
Last edited:
Continuing the stupidity.
Hitler formed the National Socialist party but he was a Nationalist not a Socialist. It was just a word for appearance's sake. He hated anything socialist.
I expect you think that the post-war German Democratic Republic was 1. German, 2. Democratic, 3. A Republic.
Derp.
Fascism and Communism/Socialism are both poisonous branches of the same tree with the roots firmly embedded in the philosophical teachings of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. A Pox on all their houses.
It's disappointing that Americans are so poorly educated that they think that Hitler was remotely Socialist. It's depressing that this has to be repeated continually, else it becomes accepted fact in true Goebbels fashion.
JohnnySavage
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Posts
- 44,472
Hitler!!!!!
HisArpy
Loose canon extraordinair
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2016
- Posts
- 44,470
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,406
I was explaining the basic difference between Nazism and Fascism it is what I said it was. The Nazi system embraced Aryanism (the racial superiority of one race over others) it wasn't just the Jewish population they felt superior to but the Nazis divided the European population into five subtypes. Nordic, Mediterranean, Dinaric, Alpine, and East Baltic. The Nordic group considered superior to the other sub-groups mentioned. They hated the Slavic people and identified them as "subhuman." They didn't consider the Jews to be a subtype of the European people. The Aryan Herrenvolk ("master race") was embraced by Hitler from the very beginning. Hitler wrote Mein Kampf in 1925-1926 in which he explained his anti-Semitism in Volume 1 Chapter 11: Nation and Race.
So once again we find you completely full of shit with no reading or scholarly skills of your own. You'd be better off just shutting the fuck up on subjects of history.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,406
The modern version we see being showcased by the Democrat party.
You wouldn't know the difference between NAZI's and Fascism any more than you can understand the difference between Communism and Socialism. Just shut the fuck you DUNCE!!
Yup, the "progressives" will have to be dealt with eventually.
Really? What exactly are you proposing here chubby? Oh right, just more fantasy while you stroke your penis substitute. Maybe try some Viagra instead so you can stroke the real thing....
BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 8,571
Do you mean the Democratic Party?
Gotta love revisionists 80 years after the events trying to explain the difference between Fascism & Nazism and deducing that Hitler was a Socialist.
Fucking idiots.
My parent's houses were bombed by the Luftwaffe during the blitz and they saw no difference, but they knew damn well that Hitler was no Socialist.
Fucking idiots.
My parent's houses were bombed by the Luftwaffe during the blitz and they saw no difference, but they knew damn well that Hitler was no Socialist.
They miss that simple name all the time. Is it any wonder they miss other simple facts as well?
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,406
No, for the reasons I explained to you the other day in Reality 101. I can only conclude now that you were characteristically asleep.
BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 8,571
Anyone who comments on politics without even knowing basic facts like the names of the parties can be safely ignored.
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,406
Go ahead put me in ignore, things will go a lot easier for you.
She said what they say can be ignored, not that she was putting you on ignore. Learn to read you fucking dunce!
Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,406
Learn to mind your own busines, you old bitty.
- Status
Similar threads
