jaF0
Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Posts
- 39,168
Wrongturd: 'Mega MAGAt Hero American patriot.'What do you call a lawyer like John Eastman who was the main architect constructing the Big Lie?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrongturd: 'Mega MAGAt Hero American patriot.'What do you call a lawyer like John Eastman who was the main architect constructing the Big Lie?
He hasn’t said anything so it’s anyone’s guess.I haven't heard Bragg deny it.
^^ there's a stupidYet you grovel at the feet of one of the greatest con-artists of all time. The puppet Biden with Obama's hand up his ass.
ah, the importance of punctuation. Your second sentence isn't saying what you think it does. *hint* the comma should come after 'Sorry', otherwise it says you are sorry that it hasn't rather than create the facetious statement you were aiming for. dumbarse.<-deliberateWhatever. You just try to intimidate and shout people down. Sorry that fucked up ploy has never worked on me.
He hasn’t said anything so it’s anyone’s guess.
There are two narratives being trumpeted (parroted) by the rightThis turd is almost as much a traitor as the Orangutan
Possible Trump Arrest Is 'Effort to Distract' From Hunter Biden: Comer
The former president claimed on Truth Social on Saturday that he will be criminally indicted and arrested on Tuesday.
JaFo: Just Another Fucking Orifice for ignorant bullshit.Wrongturd: 'Mega MAGAt Hero American patriot.'
Clinton was charged with far less serious crimes. So don't give me this "It's all a political witch hunt" crap. Because deep down you know that is bullshit.Sol Wisenberg, former federal Prosecutor and Special Counsel, says he is no fan of Donald Trump but when asked on Fox News says there is a legal term of art for what is happening to Trump in NY, he says it starts with Chicken and ends with shit. He states nobody else in America would ever be charged with these "weak sister" charges. He notes the Prosecutor is a Democrat and the charges are obviously political. He also notes the statute of limitations has long since run out, even if the charges could be pursued.
Except, nobody has been able to prove a damn thing except they know how to blow smoke up everyone's ass.There are two narratives being trumpeted (parroted) by the right
1. This is an effort to distract from the Hunter investigation
2. The FBI is already working to instigate and initiate violence that they will blame on Tump supporters. (Even while Trump, himself, called for people to take to the streets)
Not a single one recognizes that 45 has engaged in corrupt business practices his entire career, utilizing shady lawyer techniques and payoffs to hide it ..which is something publicly obvious and recognizable by those who have done business with him over the years who have ended up in jail.
What insurrection? Were there any weapons? Any officers murdered? Oh yeah, I remember they said 5 officers murdered, and then it was zero weeks later. Protestors were murdered, fact, but don't let that spoil your fantasy.They better get the perp walk on camera.
And that corrupt orange traitor STILL needs to be held accountable for being the LEADER of the failed insurrection.
20 years to life sounds about right.
![]()
This is correct - by process, once the prosecution has completed gathering and presenting their evidence to the grand jury, they lay out the specific case and the specific charges they're asking the grand jury to find probable cause for, then they leave them to review the evidence and charges and determine, via majority vote, whether or not probable cause exists.The grand jury is the one who gives the green light on indictment.
Bill Clinton was charged with violating 11 federal statute felonies by Ken Starr in his impeachment proceedings. Trump was accused of "abuse of power" which isn't a federal crime. In fact, it was specifically rejected as a cause for impeachment in the Federal List Papers debate by the founders. he was also accused of Contempt Of Congress but was acquitted on both. His second Impeachment was on charges of "Incitement to Insurrection' of which he was aquitted by the Senate.Clinton was charged with far less serious crimes. So don't give me this "It's all a political witch hunt" crap. Because deep down you know that is bullshit.
Nobody is above the law. Convicting Trump of this one charge will be the least they can do. If the justice system in the U.S. worked as the Founding Fathers envisioned, he would already be hung for treason. And if you had any knowledge of American history you would know this too.
Article II, charging Clinton with obstruction of justice alleged in part that:
- the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate government employee;
- prior perjurious, false and misleading testimony he gave in a federal civil rights action brought against him;
- prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a federal judge in that civil rights action; and
- his corrupt efforts to influence the testimony of witnesses and to impede the discovery of evidence in that civil rights action.[38][39]
The means used to implement this course of conduct or scheme included one or more of the following acts:
- ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to execute a sworn affidavit in that proceeding that he knew to be perjurious, false and misleading.
- ... corruptly encouraged a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him to give perjurious, false and misleading testimony if and when called to testify personally in that proceeding.
- ... corruptly engaged in, encouraged, or supported a scheme to conceal evidence that had been subpoenaed in a Federal civil rights action brought against him.
- ... intensified and succeeded in an effort to secure job assistance to a witness in a Federal civil rights action brought against him in order to corruptly prevent the truthful testimony of that witness in that proceeding at a time when the truthful testimony of that witness would have been harmful to him.
- ... at his deposition in a Federal civil rights action brought against him, William Jefferson Clinton corruptly allowed his attorney to make false and misleading statements to a Federal judge characterizing an affidavit, in order to prevent questioning deemed relevant by the judge. Such false and misleading statements were subsequently acknowledged by his attorney in a communication to that judge.
- ... related a false and misleading account of events relevant to a Federal civil rights action brought against him to a potential witness in that proceeding, in order to corruptly influence the testimony of that witness.
- ... made false and misleading statements to potential witnesses in a Federal grand jury proceeding in order to corruptly influence the testimony of those witnesses. The false and misleading statements made by William Jefferson Clinton were repeated by the witnesses to the grand jury, causing the grand jury to receive false and misleading information.[38][40]
On the day before leaving office on January 20, 2001, Clinton, in what amounted to a plea bargain, agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license and to pay a $25,000 fine as part of an agreement with independent counsel Robert Ray to end the investigation without the filing of any criminal charges for perjury or obstruction of justice.[57][58] Clinton was automatically suspended from the United States Supreme Court bar as a result of his law license suspension. However, as is customary, he was allowed 40 days to appeal the otherwise automatic disbarment. Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar during the 40-day appeals period."Simply put, the president's deposition testimony regarding whether he had ever been alone with Ms. (Monica) Lewinsky was intentionally false, and his statements regarding whether he had ever engaged in sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky likewise were intentionally false.[56]
When every person he does business with ends up in jail, there's a reason. When his businesses all go bankrupt, there's a reason.Except, nobody has been able to prove a damn thing except they know how to blow smoke up everyone's ass.
Didn't you just say you weren't going to do this because you already refuted it?Bill Clinton was charged with violating 11 federal statute felonies by Ken Starr in his impeachment proceedings. Trump was accused of "abuse of power" which isn't a federal crime. In fact, it was specifically rejected as a cause for impeachment in the Federal List Papers debate by the founders. he was also accused of Contempt Of Congress but was acquitted on both. His second Impeachment was on charges of "Incitement to Insurrection' of which he was aquitted by the Senate.
Impeachment charges against Bill Clinton by Ken Starr, from Wiki:
Article II, charging Clinton with obstruction of justice alleged in part that:
Bill Clinton on his contempt of court citation from Wiki:
"In April 1999, about two months after being acquitted by the Senate, Clinton was cited by federal District Judge Susan Webber Wright for civil contempt of court for his "willful failure" to obey her orders to testify truthfully in the Paula Jones sexual harassment lawsuit. For this, Clinton was assessed a $90,000 fine and the matter was referred to the Arkansas Supreme Court to see if disciplinary action would be appropriate.[56]
Regarding Clinton's January 17, 1998, deposition where he was placed under oath, Webber Wright wrote:
On the day before leaving office on January 20, 2001, Clinton, in what amounted to a plea bargain, agreed to a five-year suspension of his Arkansas law license and to pay a $25,000 fine as part of an agreement with independent counsel Robert Ray to end the investigation without the filing of any criminal charges for perjury or obstruction of justice.[57][58] Clinton was automatically suspended from the United States Supreme Court bar as a result of his law license suspension. However, as is customary, he was allowed 40 days to appeal the otherwise automatic disbarment. Clinton resigned from the Supreme Court bar during the 40-day appeals period."
I’m sure they’ll find a judge Sullivan type to hear the case should it go to court. Exculpatory evidence will be inadmissible, guilty till proven innocentSol Wisenberg, former federal Prosecutor and Special Counsel, says he is no fan of Donald Trump but when asked on Fox News says there is a legal term of art for what is happening to Trump in NY, he says it starts with Chicken and ends with shit. He states nobody else in America would ever be charged with these "weak sister" charges. He notes the Prosecutor is a Democrat and the charges are obviously political. He also notes the statute of limitations has long since run out, even if the charges could be pursued.
This was a case turned down by two premier aspects of the Trump-hating world. The federal prosecutors of the SDNY and the DOJ in DC.I’m sure they’ll find a judge Sullivan type to hear the case should it go to court. Exculpatory evidence will be inadmissible, guilty till proven innocent![]()
The whole proceeding is as farcical as the two impeachments. Bragg won’t prosecute violent gun felons but will attempt to prosecute an NDA contract. I hope Bragg is exposed for the political hack he truly is and gets laughed out of the BAR association. Whatever happened to Letitia Jame’s bullshit case?This was a case turned down by two premier aspects of the Trump-hating world. The federal prosecutors of the SDNY and the DOJ in DC.
That's not to say that if any of the Commie Orwellian kids from Stanford Law are ever hired by law firms they couldn't make the case.![]()
How many violent gun felons has he not prosecuted?The whole proceeding is as farcical as the two impeachments. Bragg won’t prosecute violent gun felons but will attempt to prosecute an NDA contract. I hope Bragg is exposed for the political hack he truly is and gets laughed out of the BAR association. Whatever happened to Letitia Jame’s bullshit case?
Apparently, her IQ was a bit higher than Bragg's.The whole proceeding is as farcical as the two impeachments. Bragg won’t prosecute violent gun felons but will attempt to prosecute an NDA contract. I hope Bragg is exposed for the political hack he truly is and gets laughed out of the BAR association. Whatever happened to Letitia Jame’s bullshit case?
How do you know that? Why do you uncritically trust anything Donald Trump says?The whole proceeding is as farcical as the two impeachments. Bragg won’t prosecute violent gun felons but will attempt to prosecute an NDA contract. I hope Bragg is exposed for the political hack he truly is and gets laughed out of the BAR association. Whatever happened to Letitia Jame’s bullshit case?