Trump to be Arrested Tuesday

Nancy Pelosi issued a statement suggesting Trump just made up his announcement to get attention. She could be right. Not sure anyone in the know has confirmed or denied Trumps claim of an imminent arrest.

We do know that Manhattan DA Bragg and a grand jury have been working on building a case against Trump. UVA law professor Jonathan Turely and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy are skeptical about the legal merits. The WSJ report doesn’t give Never Trumpers much reason for hope either.
I watched them both this morning. Like Trump could get a fair shake from a NY grand jury panel? Leftist Politics plays a big part in NY, DC jurisprudence.
 
I watched them both this morning. Like Trump could get a fair shake from a NY grand jury panel? Leftist Politics plays a big part in NY, DC jurisprudence.
Yes.

He said he could murder someone in cold blood and get away with it, you partisan water-carrying Trumpette.

"I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?"
Trump remarked at a campaign stop at Dordt College in Sioux Center, Iowa. "It's, like, incredible."

You tried.

😑
 
A Friggin' Ghetto lawyer who can't figure out that he can't turn a state misdemeanor into a federal felony and can't prosecute it as such either. This is the same bullshit prosecution the DOJ and the Federal District Attorney for the Southern District of New York walked away from. No one in history has been tried under his uniquely retarded legal concept to "get" Donald Trump. In addition election laws involving a presidential election are federal laws.

Manhattan DA's Trump case rests on shaky legal, ethical ground, experts say​

Ordinarily, such a charge would be considered a misdemeanor and come with a two-year statue of limitation.
By Ben Whedon
Updated: March 18, 2023 - 11:27pm

Trump's attorney, Joe Tacopina has argued that Trump's payment to Cohen was in fact a legitimate legal fee. Trump, he noted, never directly paid Daniels any money. Rather, he only paid his own lawyer for services rendered, i.e. legal fees.

"The payments were made to a lawyer, not to Stormy Daniels," Tacopina said last week on MSNBC. "The payments were made to Donald Trump's lawyer, which would be considered legal fees. Michael Cohen ... was his lawyer at the time and advised him that this was the proper way to do this to protect himself and his family from embarrassment. It's as simple as that."

As a hush money payment to ensure silence about an affair would not be illegal in and of itself, Bragg's case would likely hinge on a possible campaign finance violation. If Cohen's payment to Daniels constituted an illegal campaign contribution, then the falsification of records would have concealed an underlying crime, providing legal predicate for a Class E felony charge of first degree falsifying business records. Trump would face up to four years in prison if convicted on the charge.

Bragg, therefore, needs to demonstrate that the payments occurred specifically with the intent to affect the election, a prospect Turley called "extremely difficult," given the myriad other legitimate reasons Trump might have for wanting to keep an alleged affair out of the spotlight.

The rest here: https://justthenews.com/government/...se-rests-shaky-legal-ground-legal-experts-say

"Turley" quoted above refers to the renowned Democrat law Professor Jonathon Turley of George Town University.
Pease define "Ghetto lawyer"
 
No one is above the law.
No one should be above the law. But when nothing comes from any of this...who will you blame then? Because the reality is we have a different justice system based on color...and wealth
 
Nancy Pelosi issued a statement suggesting Trump just made up his announcement to get attention. She could be right. Not sure anyone in the know has confirmed or denied Trumps claim of an imminent arrest.

We do know that Manhattan DA Bragg and a grand jury have been working on building a case against Trump. UVA law professor Jonathan Turely and former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy are skeptical about the legal merits. The WSJ report doesn’t give Never Trumpers much reason for hope either.
I haven't heard Bragg deny it.
 
Pease define "Ghetto lawyer"
A DA (Soros funded) failing to prosecute criminals in the ghetto or a lawyer exploiting the existence of large numbers of criminals in the ghetto for personal gain, or those willfully engaged in a conspiracy to exploit the laws for the benefit of criminals in the ghetto, like the one broadcasting here:
:D
 
A DA (Soros funded) failing to prosecute criminals in the ghetto or a lawyer exploiting the existence of large numbers of criminals in the ghetto for personal gain, or those willfully engaged in a conspiracy to exploit the laws for the benefit of criminals in the ghetto, like the one broadcasting here:
:D
Define ghetto
 
He was punished for violating federal law and politically for conduct unbecoming of a president. Oh, and the election was never stolen in 2000, that is a proven fact, your fantasies notwithstanding. I posted the evidence a couple of years ago. Go look it up.
Which is fancy talk for he got a BJ.

The election very much was "stolen" we know who got the most votes in Florida and it wasn't Bush, Gore played his hand incorrectly and it cost him its ultimately that simple.
 
The election very much was "stolen" we know who got the most votes in Florida and it wasn't Bush, Gore played his hand incorrectly and it cost him its ultimately that simple.
No you don't know. He didn't get the votes in Florida. I told you I posted the evidence. You have posted anything except superstition.
 
The grand jury is the one who gives the green light on indictment.
As we all know, "you can indict a ham sandwich." Why do you think that saying has reached so much prominence in legal circles?
 
As we all know, "you can indict a ham sandwich." Why do you think that saying has reached so much prominence in legal circles?
Lol, right And somehow you feel that a ton of Democrats aren't being indicted.

Jfc, you're a pathetic person. The amount of contortion you go through to continue playing the victim is absurd
 
A DA (Soros funded) failing to prosecute criminals in the ghetto or a lawyer exploiting the existence of large numbers of criminals in the ghetto for personal gain, or those willfully engaged in a conspiracy to exploit the laws for the benefit of criminals in the ghetto, like the one broadcasting here:
:D
What do you call a lawyer like John Eastman who was the main architect constructing the Big Lie?
 
Back
Top