Apparently I offended you. That wasn't my intent.
You are an incel in your moms basement projecting your fantasies of how women should behave.
You are worse than BB.
Good “girl”.


Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently I offended you. That wasn't my intent.
Apparently I offended you. That wasn't my intent.
That's fair. I'd suppose the government owns or at least has the ability to control our bodies. They can draft us into the army and prohibit us from consuming certain substances, among other things.
Our freedoms to do what we want with our bodies derive from passing laws protecting our ability to do what we want with our bodies.
I don't really believe the government owns bodies, but they do coerce behavior all the time.
They could compel donations of blood or organs or reinstate the draft, but it would be extremely unpopular.
I don't agree with forced gestation but saying the government doesn't own our bodies unfortunately isn't going to prevent certain people from passing laws forcing it.
Then how do you explain most pro life advocates are indeed women and a major part of society. I find it hard to believe those pro life women don't respect women. I think they respect the sanctity of life in the womb.
The voting populace felt comforted for years knowing Roe was the law of the land. Now they have to vote for politicians knowing that their vote will affect this very issue. Even Kansas voted to uphold the right to choose.
I didn't write women are either/ or, I wrote most *pro life advocates* are women not most women are pro life.Most women are pro-choice. Please keep your propaganda to yourself.
Pro-life doesn't mean pro-life. It means anti-abortion and pro forced gestation.I didn't write women are either/ or, I wrote most *pro life advocates* are women not most women are pro life.
Pro choice does not necessarily mean pro abortion! It means choice should be an individual's decision.
She was told premature induction of labor could be done at that stage of pregnancy only if the condition threatened her life.
Lakeland Regional Health emailed a statement from Timothy Boynton, the chief public relations and communications officer:
“Lakeland Regional Health and its physicians honor the privacy and health of each patient. As an organization, Lakeland Regional Health upholds the responsibility to care for each individual patient while abiding with all local, state, and federal laws.”
Likely it will go the way of the hat pin.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...nt-woman-fetal-personhood-reproductive-rights
This could destroy the Supreme Court's Ruling. States can't pick and choose...
This case will be a prime opportunity for DeSantis to further codify women in Florida as little more than "birthing vessels", second class citizen status. He might be magnanimous and upgrade women to first class citizen once they are post-menopausal, having fulfilled their obligation to the state.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...nt-woman-fetal-personhood-reproductive-rights
This could destroy the Supreme Court's Ruling. States can't pick and choose...
You seem to be really proud of that one.
We have idiots like her, your team has you.
I don't think he realizes that it's a parody account. But then no surprise.You seem to be really proud of that one.
Hence their pro-death penalty and pro-gun stances.Pro-life doesn't mean pro-life.
Hence their pro-death penalty and pro-gun stances.
But Dr. Berger, Dorbert’s primary care doctor, said in the medical field, fetus viability happens at 23-24 weeks, when Dorbert learned the news of her baby’s diagnosis.
“Pass a law that defines viability in the way she describes it. That’s not how the medical community determines it. Be more specific. Don’t have ambiguities in your laws,” said Dr. Berger.
In the meantime, Dorbert’s medical team is monitoring her blood pressure and her baby’s heartbeat.
in most first countries in the world this would be considered a cruel and unusual punishment of the mother (AND father!). I can't help but come back to these lawmakers who refuse abortions in these cases, as to what they'd do if it was one of their own kids or even one of their family pets? Would they allow a prized pet horse to be at such medical risk in the same situation? Or the family doggie?https://thehill.com/policy/healthca...te-baby-having-little-chance-of-survival/amp/
But hey on the upside if it goes stillborn then maybe she can get treatment.
Wait…you mean it’s not your account?I don't think he realizes that it's a parody account. But then no surprise.
It's because they treat abortion as criminal instead of healthcare.in most first countries in the world this would be considered a cruel and unusual punishment of the mother (AND father!). I can't help but come back to these lawmakers who refuse abortions in these cases, as to what they'd do if it was one of their own kids or even one of their family pets? Would they allow a prized pet horse to be at such medical risk in the same situation? Or the family doggie?
I think it's because they treat a fetus as if it was a human being.It's because they treat abortion as criminal instead of healthcare.