Conservative Hate is Tearing America Apart

Nope. They make those choices because they’re effective and improve their bottom line.
Johhny thinks advertisers run ads to piss off potential consumers of their products.....why am I not surprised.....
 
Nope. They make those choices because they’re effective and improve their bottom line.
I am interested in reading a survey about those advertisements.

When the first advertisement like that advertised Cheerios during a Super Bowl the video showing that advertisement attracted so many negative comments that those who made the video closed the comment section.
 
There is hate on both ends of the political spectrum. Fuzzy1975 and ll74 have made it clear that they are not interested in debating with me about racial matters. They know that the facts I post are true, but they hate the facts, so they hate me for drawing attention to them.

Those who are responsible for advertisements featuring stupid white men and prosperous black men with beautiful white women are acting out their hatred for white male blue collar workers. They know the advertisement irritate white male blue collar workers. That is why they are doing it. The advertisements also irritate black women.
Because you're just a racist, we've laid out the fact and the reasons why your facts show up but you're not actually interested in that crap.
 
Because you're just a racist, we've laid out the fact and the reasons why your facts show up but you're not actually interested in that crap.
Calling me a racist does not disprove the factual assertions I have documented about intractable average racial differences. Calling me a racist indicates that my arguments are impossible to disprove.
 
Calling me a racist does not disprove the factual assertions I have documented about intractable average racial differences. Calling me a racist indicates that my arguments are impossible to disprove.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

We call the above "pretzel logic". LMFAO,

Seriously Johhny, just fuck off and die already........
 
Violence is essentially a male thing. Realistically.

I'm talking about propaganda - which conservatives consume more than anything else. Fox, OAN, Newsmax, PJ media. Etc. All of which are known for their lack of accuracy as well as their conspiracy theories.

Maybe violence SHOULDN'T be a male thing, realistically. There are things in this world that worth dying for. That are worth killing for.
 
I'd say characterizing any one side as violent is a grotesque over-generalization. We on the left will bring up jan 6th and they'd bring up the BLM rioting and looting and on and on it will go until we run out of breath or start looking at each other as fellow citizens rather than leftist or right-winger.
Except right-wing stories about BLM and antifa destroying blue cities are fiction. They only way they can claim both sides are violent is by making things up.

It exposes what both-sideism really is—an attempt to excuse the violence and extremism of the right by pretending the left does it too.
 
In general I don’t approve of male violence, but I make an exception for punching Nazis.

Is it OK to punch Nazis?


https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/fash-punch1.gif
https://theconversation.com/is-it-ok-to-punch-nazis-71991

Meet Richard Spencer. Spencer is a major figure in the alt-right, a term he claims to have invented. Profiles of him tend to note his education, dapper suits, expensive watch, and haircut.

He is also an ardent and wholly unrepentant white supremacist and ethnonationalist who advocates what he calls “peaceful ethnic cleansing” to achieve a “white homeland.” He says America belongs to white people, who he claims have higher average IQs than Hispanic and African Americans and that the latter are genetically predisposed to crime. He has called for eugenicist forced sterilisation (but it’s ok, you see, because “They could still enjoy sex. You are not ruining their life”). The nice suits are no accident: Spencer deliberately cultivates a ‘respectable’ facade from which to spout his grotesque racist ideology.
And he loves him some Trump. At an alt-right conference not long after Trump won the 2016 election, Spencer yelled “Hail Trump!” prompting some of his supporters to give the Nazi salute. He insisted that’s somehow acceptable because it was done in a spirit of “irony and exuberance.”
 
This is the perceptual issue I'm talking about. The exaggeration of the extreme to the point where they are not able to realistically perceive the points on the spectrum.
Americans for tax fairness
Cnbc
PBS
Npr
The Hill...

Quoting entities that have been proven to be skewed in their delivery of "news" to support your argument that you don't practice that which you claim to hate, is in fact exercising exactly that.

What's next doxxing? Maybe claim that I'm sealioning you if I ask if you've ever read anything that you believe is "false" that might give you a more well rounded opinion concerning your emotional argument.

Better yet, link me in with "them" before knowing anything about me because you read one comment I made that happened to contain something that you felt compelled to attempt to disprove.
 
Americans for tax fairness
Cnbc
PBS
Npr
The Hill...

Quoting entities that have been proven to be skewed in their delivery of "news" to support your argument that you don't practice that which you claim to hate, is in fact exercising exactly that.

What's next doxxing? Maybe claim that I'm sealioning you if I ask if you've ever read anything that you believe is "false" that might give you a more well rounded opinion concerning your emotional argument.

Better yet, link me in with "them" before knowing anything about me because you read one comment I made that happened to contain something that you felt compelled to attempt to disprove.
learn to read.
 
Assholes like when you treat their bullshit with care and don't say mean words to them, like "you're wrong"

They're used to being seen as important and smart because they've surrounded themselves with people who do so.

Oh wait...this is a thread about conservatives?
 
Americans for tax fairness
Cnbc
PBS
Npr
The Hill...

Quoting entities that have been proven to be skewed in their delivery of "news" to support your argument that you don't practice that which you claim to hate, is in fact exercising exactly that.

What's next doxxing? Maybe claim that I'm sealioning you if I ask if you've ever read anything that you believe is "false" that might give you a more well rounded opinion concerning your emotional argument.

Better yet, link me in with "them" before knowing anything about me because you read one comment I made that happened to contain something that you felt compelled to attempt to disprove.

This sounds like a very emotionally based response.

You accused me of a biased narrative based on a very slim majority. I posted clear documentation of the historical and current trends for the statements I gave.

Again, your perspective is obviously inaccurate.
 
I'd say characterizing any one side as violent is a grotesque over-generalization. We on the left will bring up jan 6th and they'd bring up the BLM rioting and looting and on and on it will go until we run out of breath or start looking at each other as fellow citizens rather than leftist or right-winger.
Reality check. "BLM" riots are the direct result of state sponsored murder of unarmed Black men, women, and children by police. Often recorded on video. A real thing. Jan. 6th is made up bullshit designed to overthrow a free and fair election. The two are in no way comparable. One is about equal justice under the law. The other is about thug fascism seeking to destroy democracy.
 
Calling me a racist does not disprove the factual assertions I have documented about intractable average racial differences. Calling me a racist indicates that my arguments are impossible to disprove.
Because you do not make factual assertions, you make really gross generalizations and hope like hell that we'll go around hunting down over a hundred years of history, not just what you claim but the causes around what happened over the decades of history. Calling you a racist doesn't mean your arguments are impossible to disprove. Sometimes it can but that's something that racists made up. Pointing out that somehow we were in a Cold War with Russia and (up until recently) we at least pretended to be on decent terms with them. Cuba on the flip side. . .why exactly can't we lift the embargo on them? What did Venezuela do while we're at it? I mean I know they nationalized their oil instead of giving it to us, but does that justify us making it difficult for them to trade instead of propping up our neighbors and F the Sauds?

OH OH OH. Depending on who exactly you ask between 40 & 60% of all illegal immigrants came in legally and overstayed their visas. A wall would do nothing to them because they are already in the fucking country. I know that's a real complicated issue for some people. You know what would stop a good chunk of them AND would at least stem the flow of those sneaking across the borders? Audit the businesses and put HR and owners in federal pound me in the ass prison.

Back when Trump was on the trail v Hillary a reporter asked him if he employed illegals at his construction sites. He said one of the most honest things I've hear ANY rich person, not just Trump but anybody in a similar situation to him say. "I'm not involved with the day to day ground level operations." Or "I don't know" in plain speak. You know what I think would make him care? If his management on a given site went to jail, he faced a fine in the tens of millions and a delay as he had to send new people down.

Streamline getting a visa, so we do know who is coming (and going) and tell them that if they get caught on an expired Visa it will be revoked and they'll have to go to the back of the line, rescreened, all that jazz. That would incentivize them to go renew if they are staying past the season.

But that would affect rich primarily white people which is unacceptable. There is no having a conversation with people who want a wall after being presented with the facts, and these were brought up BY RICK SANTORUM. In 2012 and he's a PoS but hey when he speaks the truth he speaks truth.

IQ has been discredited long ago as an accurate method of measuring intelligence and you always loop back around.

There is no quality reason to engage you, I love how your cronies who won't quite say the same things as you claim we are shutting the conversation down instead despite the term rarely if ever being turned on them because most of them are in the "Okay maybe they really are just ignorant." zone.
 
Because you do not make factual assertions, you make really gross generalizations and hope like hell that we'll go around hunting down over a hundred years of history, not just what you claim but the causes around what happened over the decades of history.
I have made the following factual assertions on many occasions:

U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2011

Based on available data from 1980 to 2008—  Blacks were disproportionately represented as both homicide victims and offenders. The victimization rate for blacks (27.8 per 100,000) was 6 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000). The offending rate for blacks (34.4 per 100,000) was almost 8 times higher than the rate for whites (4.5 per 100,000)
https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/htus8008.pdf

-----------

=========================
2006 College & University
Guidance, Scholarships, Money and Info Gateways
(For Students, Parents, College Advisors, Mentors,
and Cultural Groups)
==========================


SAT and ACT Scores by Race/Ethnicity: 2003

In recent years the noted pattern of test scores has reflected similar numbers--
Editor, 2005

SAT Ethnic Group Scores (Math/Verbal+total)

• American Indian---482/480 (962)
• Asian American-----575/508 (1083)
• African American-----426/431 (857)
• Puerto Rican----457/448 (905)

Other Hispanic----464/457 (921)

• White-----534/529 (1063)
• Other ----513/501 (1014)

Source: www.collegeboard.com

Average ACT Composite Score by Race/Ethnicity, 2003
----------------------------------------------------

• African American ----16.9
• American Indian---18.7
• Caucasian---- 21.7
• Mexican American----18.3
• Asian American---- 21.8
• Hispanic----19.0
• Other ----19.3
• Multiracial-----20.9
• Prefer Not to Respond -----21.8
• No Response-----20.1

Source: www.act.org

Quote from attached SAT/ACT article:

"Readiness for college science and math coursework was particularly low among African American students. Only 5 percent of African American test-takers scored at or above the college-readiness benchmark for college biology, and just 10
percent attained the readiness benchmark for college algebra. Ferguson said Black students were less likely than others to take tough, college-prep courses and "often don't receive the information and guidance they need to properly plan for college."

For overview and more info, go to:
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0DXK/15_20/109265562/p1/article.jhtml

http://www.blackexcel.org/06-sat-act-scores-by-race-ethnicity.htm


-----------

illegitimacy 3.png

-----------


Do you claim that the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics, the SAT, the ACT, and the U.S. Government, U.S. Census Bureay and National Center for Health Statistics are posting dishonest data.

The following bell curves demonstrate that one quarter of blacks have IQ of 75 or below. At that level they have trouble mastering minimum wage jobs. To be even marginally capable as a professional or a manager one needs an IQ of at least 115. A thin sliver of blacks are in that category.

bellcurves.jpg
 
OH OH OH. Depending on who exactly you ask between 40 & 60% of all illegal immigrants came in legally and overstayed their visas. A wall would do nothing to them because they are already in the fucking country. I know that's a real complicated issue for some people. You know what would stop a good chunk of them AND would at least stem the flow of those sneaking across the borders? Audit the businesses and put HR and owners in federal pound me in the ass prison.
I agree with you that those who hire illegal immigrants should be apprehended, tried, and punished.
 
Back when Trump was on the trail v Hillary a reporter asked him if he employed illegals at his construction sites. He said one of the most honest things I've hear ANY rich person, not just Trump but anybody in a similar situation to him say. "I'm not involved with the day to day ground level operations." Or "I don't know" in plain speak. You know what I think would make him care? If his management on a given site went to jail, he faced a fine in the tens of millions and a delay as he had to send new people down.
I hate Trump and want him to end his life this way:

TrumpinPrison 2.jpg
 

Is it OK to punch Nazis?


https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/fash-punch1.gif
https://theconversation.com/is-it-ok-to-punch-nazis-71991

Meet Richard Spencer. Spencer is a major figure in the alt-right, a term he claims to have invented. Profiles of him tend to note his education, dapper suits, expensive watch, and haircut.

He is also an ardent and wholly unrepentant white supremacist and ethnonationalist who advocates what he calls “peaceful ethnic cleansing” to achieve a “white homeland.” He says America belongs to white people, who he claims have higher average IQs than Hispanic and African Americans and that the latter are genetically predisposed to crime. He has called for eugenicist forced sterilisation (but it’s ok, you see, because “They could still enjoy sex. You are not ruining their life”). The nice suits are no accident: Spencer deliberately cultivates a ‘respectable’ facade from which to spout his grotesque racist ideology.
And he loves him some Trump. At an alt-right conference not long after Trump won the 2016 election, Spencer yelled “Hail Trump!” prompting some of his supporters to give the Nazi salute. He insisted that’s somehow acceptable because it was done in a spirit of “irony and exuberance.”
People that know their history, often from surviving family members, won't wait to be loaded into box cars before they start fighting back. Nip this shit in the bud. Never again.
 
IQ has been discredited long ago as an accurate method of measuring intelligence and you always loop back around.
IQ has never been discredited, but the tests are becoming better able to measure the ability to learn, rather than what has been learned. Tests exist now that require no knowledge of reading and no knowledge of mathematics. They can be explained with no use of English. A space alien could take one of those tests. I am confident that the space alien would get a perfect score in record time.

Gene alleles are being discovered that influence IQ. A professor at the University of Chicago was working on a DNA test to determine IQ. He stopped saying, "Some things should not be known." That is an appalling attitude for a scientist.

If those who pretend that IQ tests measure nothing of value, or that IQ scores can be significantly raised, really believed it, they would welcome candid and civil debates with people like Charles Murray. Instead Charles Murray is often prevented from speaking on College Campuses.

The U.S. military pioneered the use of IQ testing during World War I. It remains committed, because for a century the tests have accurately predicted who can quickly learn complex skills, and who cannot.
 
They would love to see everyone who disagrees with them gone. Some of them by less than reputable means. See those 2nd amendment solutions.

I am very serious when I say their hate is tearing the country apart. They feed into the propaganda that tells them they must hate anyone who disagrees with them.
Look...people don't like the truth. Osama Bin Laden started the ball rolling. He recognized the way to destroy America was from within. And he succeeded. Putin saw the success in this...and picked up the pieces...and he has succeeded at his objectives. Xi saw this...of course he was going to use it...and he is succeeding. Republicans don't have an original thought in their head....but it doesn't take many brains to see this tactic works.

Our country was already torn apart. Republicans have just put the nails in the coffin. Sooner or later, Democrats will realize they can't save the Country from itself. But they can save parts of the country. Is it not better to save what can be saved instead of losing everything?

Republicans want to criticize Biden for waiting to shoot down the balloon calling him weak. Yet, under Trump's 4 year reign, our country had 3 Chinese balloons cross our country and he did nothing. How can you converse with this mentality? You can't. Save what can be saved.
 
Utterly shocking that most Americans want higher taxes on someone other than themselves.
 

Is it OK to punch Nazis?


https://metro.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/fash-punch1.gif
https://theconversation.com/is-it-ok-to-punch-nazis-71991

Meet Richard Spencer. Spencer is a major figure in the alt-right, a term he claims to have invented. Profiles of him tend to note his education, dapper suits, expensive watch, and haircut.

He is also an ardent and wholly unrepentant white supremacist and ethnonationalist who advocates what he calls “peaceful ethnic cleansing” to achieve a “white homeland.” He says America belongs to white people, who he claims have higher average IQs than Hispanic and African Americans and that the latter are genetically predisposed to crime. He has called for eugenicist forced sterilisation (but it’s ok, you see, because “They could still enjoy sex. You are not ruining their life”). The nice suits are no accident: Spencer deliberately cultivates a ‘respectable’ facade from which to spout his grotesque racist ideology.
And he loves him some Trump. At an alt-right conference not long after Trump won the 2016 election, Spencer yelled “Hail Trump!” prompting some of his supporters to give the Nazi salute. He insisted that’s somehow acceptable because it was done in a spirit of “irony and exuberance.”
This guy must be JohnEnglman's wet dream of a hero!!
 
National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Market Experience of Youth 1980-1990.

That is where JohnE takes this chart. He tries to claim it an accurate reflection of the Black population in America. However the survey is only from 14 year old to 21, only in high density urban locations.

I did actually dig through the study and try and find the actual survey results upon which this graph was made from, but I couldn't even find the graph. You are all free to hit a google search and look for yourselfs.

The last time I saw JE post this "graph", it was titled to a 1979-1980 study by the NLS. That study is not available online, I am thinking our friend the computer program made a change after being called out on this particular graph.....
 
correct. your posts prove that you're a poorly educated racist which, as a poc, i proved several times last week, leading you to call me a "thug" after finding out about my ethnicity.

racists are inherently dumb but you have set the new standard.
I have a university degree and several years of specialized training in computer technology. You write like someone who did not get past the eighth grade.
 
Back
Top