George Santos

[Lazaran]

ineedhelp1 rewrites history.

ineedhelp1

 

[colddiesel]

As far as I'm concerned this falls into the category of "mind your own business." He may be a lying scumbag but it's up to the voters of his district to do something about it. It's not a national issue.

Nonsense. You know full well that the voters are powerless; if the GOP (which endorsed his dishonesty), has any ambition at all to recover a reputation for integrity, they and their Congressional leadership should throw him out.

 

[jaF0]

They won't.

They don't.

 

[Pad_Foot]

Hmm... If you like this on a resume, you keep your job?
His electors put him in the PEOPLE's House.
We are all his employer.
Why aren't people vetted better for a job that gives them access to sensitive information or profitable insider information??

 

[YDB95]

However... is lying prior to becoming a Member considered disorderly behavior? I'm not sure that the House should have jurisdiction over what happened before it gained jurisdiction. See, e.g., Alcee Hastings.

Alcee Hastings' constituents knew of his history when they elected him. Santos' constituents...well, they (and we) now know just about everything he told them was false.

 

[YDB95]

Maxine Waters should have been expelled from the house for inciting violence and Jury tampering during the Floyd court case.

If she had actually done either of those things, sure.

 

[icanhelp1]

If she had actually done either of those things, sure.

I wonder if you were up on murder charges and a politician was lobbying for violence if you weren’t convicted, I wonder if you still would feel the same way. If your jury feared for their lives if a decision went other than in concert with mob rule instigated by a biased politician. You’re a hypocrite. There are some legal scholars who believe Waters had her thumb on the scale.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Maxine Water: “stay on the street” and “get more confrontational” if former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is acquitted in the killing of George Floyd.

Correction, George Floyd was a felon who died of a fentanyl overdose combined with a COVID infection and THC intoxication.

Donald J Trump: And we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.

I am not posting any Ican't quotes about Trump, everyone here see's how ican't sucks Trump's cock and has filled an infinite number of bath tub for him.

So if what Waters said was so criminal, that ican't literally spews venom when he posts about her, why not the same for view for Trump? After all what Trump did was whip up a frenzy in a crowd, and then he turned them loose on the Capital....still no posts from him"condemning" Trump's actions. Nope, but plenty of those pro Trump ones we've come to laugh at and ignore...

Oh but wait, look at how ican't viewed George Floyd!! Drug addict and criminal, in other words he deserved to die...he was a waste of resources on society.

Even if Floyd didn't die from COVID, or Fentanyl, or even aided by THC, nope the Coroners reports (plural) all lead to suffocation...

 

[YDB95]

I wonder if you were up on murder charges and a politician was lobbying for violence if you weren’t convicted, I wonder if you still would feel the same way.

Vigilance on the street is not the same as violence.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Vigilance on the street is not the same as violence.

Not when a women says it, especially a Democrat..look at what he posts about Waters, Clinton, AOC...it's a long list...

 

[icanhelp1]

Vigilance on the street is not the same as violence.

Trying to conflate vigilance with confrontational is quite a stretch, even for you.

 

[YDB95]

Trying to conflate vigilance with confrontational is quite a stretch, even for you.

I can see why it would sound that way to an apologist for police brutality.

 

[Lazaran]

I can see why it would sound that way to an apologist for police brutality.

Why would Maxine Waters encourage vigilance about justice being done???

I mean, it isn’t like the police falsified the report and attempted to sweep George Floyd’s murder under the thin blue rug……

JFC

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Not permitted.

The voters have to wait until 2024.

SAD!!!

Thanks

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1613940435533312002

 

[icanhelp1]

I can see why it would sound that way to an apologist for police brutality.

What a dumbass statement, the justice system was working. Waters should have been criminally charged for inciting violence and jury tampering. Waters was instilling in the public square that only one outcome is acceptable and any other outcome will result in civil disobedience and the previous riots are evidence that violence was the public choice and Waters was right in the middle, she was sanctioning violence ( confrontational ). You and Laz are fucking hypocrites. As a public servant, Waters whipping up public sentiment that could lead to violence is egregious and unbecoming a public servant who takes an oath to uphold the law and protect the judicial process, should not have even been there, it’s not her district.

Back on point, this is about Santos.

 

[YDB95]

What a dumbass statement, the justice system was working. Waters should have been criminally charged for inciting violence and jury tampering. Waters was instilling in the public square that only one outcome is acceptable and any other outcome will result in civil disobedience

1. In a case as cut-and-dry as this one, there was only one acceptable outcome. Thank heavens, we got it.
2. What have you got against civil disobedience?

and the previous riots are evidence that violence was the public choice and Waters was right in the middle, she was sanctioning violence ( confrontational ).

That's your interpretation, nothing more or less.

 

[dkovic77]

I wonder if you were up on murder charges and a politician was lobbying for violence if you weren’t convicted, I wonder if you still would feel the same way. If your jury feared for their lives if a decision went other than in concert with mob rule instigated by a biased politician. You’re a hypocrite. There are some legal scholars who believe Waters had her thumb on the scale.

Are these “scholars” you? Because that doesn’t speak much for the issue.

 

[dkovic77]

What a dumbass statement, the justice system was working. Waters should have been criminally charged for inciting violence and jury tampering. Waters was instilling in the public square that only one outcome is acceptable and any other outcome will result in civil disobedience and the previous riots are evidence that violence was the public choice and Waters was right in the middle, she was sanctioning violence ( confrontational ). You and Laz are fucking hypocrites. As a public servant, Waters whipping up public sentiment that could lead to violence is egregious and unbecoming a public servant who takes an oath to uphold the law and protect the judicial process, should not have even been there, it’s not her district.

Back on point, this is about Santos.

Yup, back to Santos. A complete fabrication. And for a party that used to stand for values even. But with a four vote majority, they can’t do anything to make that three. I mean once the Matt G investigation finishes, that would m take it down to two. (Even though I think Kevin would be very happy for that one)

 

[zipman]

Why would Republicans get rid of Santos?

He is the epitome of the new republican party. The more you lie the better. The bigger the lie the better.

He's the real Trump jr.

 

[icanhelp1]

Are these “scholars” you? Because that doesn’t speak much for the issue.

Typical deflection, not surprised.

 

[icanhelp1]

Yup, back to Santos. A complete fabrication. And for a party that used to stand for values even. But with a four vote majority, they can’t do anything to make that three. I mean once the Matt G investigation finishes, that would m take it down to two. (Even though I think Kevin would be very happy for that one)

You obviously don't understand how congress works. I explained it earlier.

Prosecutors recommended against indictments of MG. Judge scolded the DOJ for their typical slow walking of charges, and unending investigation, kind of like the Mueller investigation.

NY doesn't allow recalls, sucks for New Yorkers. Santos is scum but so is Waters ( Senator ) and Ilhan Omar. ( house rep )

 

[HisArpy]

2. What have you got against civil disobedience?

How about that no matter how you feel about the subject, breaking the law is still breaking the law.


Because we're all supposed to know that the ends NEVER justify the means.

 

[dkovic77]

You obviously don't understand how congress works. I explained it earlier.

Oh so whenever people don’t understand from your explanations… it’s all their fault? Hmmm.

Prosecutors recommended against indictments of MG. Judge scolded the DOJ for their typical slow walking of charges, and unending investigation, kind of like the Mueller investigation.

NY doesn't allow recalls, sucks for New Yorkers. Santos is scum but so is Waters ( Senator ) and Ilhan Omar. ( house rep )

No clue how it works at all? That’s you, unlike me- it’s part of my job. (Fun when you get a job that matches with the degree you got in college, oh wait, MAGA folks don’t like education)

Your job seems to work best with, “would you like fries with that?”

 

[dkovic77]

Typical deflection, not surprised.

Nothing to deflect, you offer nothing. Bring something of value…