But, but, but .... They Says Guns Can't shoot by themselves!!!

Well if someone filing a lawsuit says it then it must be true. That would also mean the 2020 election was fixed.
Oh but in this case there is something called evidence.
But we can wait for the results of the trial first before we pass our judgment.

Those lawsuits for 2020 were laughed out of court in most cases.

My favorite is “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” federal judge Brann wrote.

“That has not happened.”
 
Oh but in this case there is something called evidence.
But we can wait for the results of the trial first before we pass our judgment.

Those lawsuits for 2020 were laughed out of court in most cases.

My favorite is “One might expect that when seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption,” federal judge Brann wrote.

“That has not happened.”
Way to miss the point dude
 
Really? What evidence exactly is there?
Well, there's the evidence that someone sued Sig...

Of course the mere existence of a lawsuit doesn't mean there's liability, but that's a concept which is well over the heads of most of the usual suspects on Lit.

I also find it funny that JaFo seems to think that one incident seems to make the rule.
 
It’s similar to the unexpected acceleration problem in certain models of cars. Many assumed that the incidents were all from driver error, until it was proven that they weren’t.
 
Well, there's the evidence that someone sued Sig...

Of course the mere existence of a lawsuit doesn't mean there's liability, but that's a concept which is well over the heads of most of the usual suspects on Lit.

I also find it funny that JaFo seems to think that one incident seems to make the rule.
The OP says over 100 incidences. Besides, bobo cuck uses one incident to make the rule argument every day.
 
Known issue with the Sig P320 which has since been recalled and fixed. I think all the confirmed incidents were caused by drops though?
 
Well, there's the evidence that someone sued Sig...

Of course the mere existence of a lawsuit doesn't mean there's liability, but that's a concept which is well over the heads of most of the usual suspects on Lit.

I also find it funny that JaFo seems to think that one incident seems to make the rule.

Yea.

I mean there could be a manufacturing flaw, but that would just further prove the point that these kinds of problems generally don't happen. It's an aberration not a standard feature.

It fits the narrative so I figured they would.

The OP says over 100 incidences. Besides, bobo cuck uses one incident to make the rule argument every day.

With a particular model, still by far an exception to the rule.

Hardly support for the leftoid fantasy that the scarier a gun looks the more likely it is to get up on it's own and go on a killing spree all on it's own because it's never the lunatics fault nope!!!! It's always those guns and that 'hate speech' that isn't censored enough.... it's civil rights that are the problem!!!
 
Last edited:
“Not. BotBoy” says: Yes, but……

And radicalization isn’t a thing???

Gun manufacturers targeting of insecure and impressionable wanna-be soldier boy incels isn’t a thing???

GMAFB

🤣
 
“Not. BotBoy” says: Yes, but……

And radicalization isn’t a thing???

Nothing radical about it.

The only radical thing here is your boogiegunz narrative.

Gun manufacturers targeting of insecure and impressionable wanna-be soldier boy incels isn’t a thing???

GMAFB

🤣

The projection here is so intense it's easy to see who the insecure one is.
 
Known issue with the Sig P320 which has since been recalled and fixed. I think all the confirmed incidents were caused by drops though?
A gun that accidentally fires when dropped is the worst kind of gun.
 
Really? What evidence exactly is there?
In the accidental shooting cases? Sure seems, just from the article and the words in the article (things you have difficulty with) that there are officers from around the country who have been shot in the leg with the gun in their holster.

I dunno, one person’s testimony might not be enough, but dozens… and medical records/ballistics. Sounds like evidence to me.

As opposed to the clown show America’s Mayor was touting with case after case for the 2020 election. But they, as you, think that thoughts are evidence. DJT can just think it and it must be true, but there is something called evidence and those cases were laughed out of court.

So this is another thing you seemed to miss when you took your state school education. You really should send your degree back Linus.
 
Known issue with the Sig P320 which has since been recalled and fixed. I think all the confirmed incidents were caused by drops though?
Yeah, that was the recall and repair. This is alleged to be a different issue. As the P320 is the new service arm I would have thought that any issues would have showed up in the qualification testing.............thousands of rounds in all sorts of severe conditions. But feces can occur.
 
Way to miss the point dude
Your point was what exactly?

I read the article, did you? The mere headline isn’t the proof- what testimony they will present (as stated in the article) is why the OP put what they did.

Your comparison to the sad, misguided, and evidence-less filings of DJT and surrogates in, how many cases, just hoping to find one judge like they did in Florida for the FBI raid, who will overlook a complete lack of evidence and rule in their favor is the point I was making.

You tried to connect to two like they were equal, almost a JohnE move with his credit card alert while he was pumping gas. Poorly constructed and fraught with holes. But it makes it seem like you said something important, but alas you didn’t.

Those weak half connections do work with the MAGA crowd though. They are big fans of anything that backs up their brand of discrimination, who needs actual facts.
 
Your point was what exactly?

I read the article, did you? The mere headline isn’t the proof- what testimony they will present (as stated in the article) is why the OP put what they did.

Your comparison to the sad, misguided, and evidence-less filings of DJT and surrogates in, how many cases, just hoping to find one judge like they did in Florida for the FBI raid, who will overlook a complete lack of evidence and rule in their favor is the point I was making.

You tried to connect to two like they were equal, almost a JohnE move with his credit card alert while he was pumping gas. Poorly constructed and fraught with holes. But it makes it seem like you said something important, but alas you didn’t.

Those weak half connections do work with the MAGA crowd though. They are big fans of anything that backs up their brand of discrimination, who needs actual facts.
Look up. If you look real hard you might see the point going by. Maybe. Im beginning to doubt it tho.
 
Look up. If you look real hard you might see the point going by. Maybe. Im beginning to doubt it tho.
Oh please, do enlighten oh great oracle!

Simply filing a case doesn’t mean results? Or some other point you were trying to make with the weak comparison?
 
Oh please, do enlighten oh great oracle!

Simply filing a case doesn’t mean results? Or some other point you were trying to make with the weak comparison?
Anyone can file a lawsuit, dipshit. That alone means and proves nothing. There is no "evidence" because there has been no trial or even discovery. Someone said something. That is quite literally all it is at this point. It may get thrown out, the gun company win, the people may win. Its nothing right now.
 
Anyone can file a lawsuit, dipshit. That alone means and proves nothing. There is no "evidence" because there has been no trial or even discovery. Someone said something. That is quite literally all it is at this point. It may get thrown out, the gun company win, the people may win. Its nothing right now.
Yes clearly anyone can, look how many DJT files. Almost like he was looking for any random win anywhere.

But this filing has so much more than the my pillow guy looking to sell more pillows to MAGA folks who can’t sleep at night.

So connecting them like you did was careless and pointless. Find another case that had an actual chance to compare, that was dismissed.

This person who filed in this case has had some victories in this arena. DJT… how many exactly?

Sometimes its the person filing that signals more legitimacy than others.

Oh how fondly we remember the four seasons.
 
Yes clearly anyone can, look how many DJT files. Almost like he was looking for any random win anywhere.

But this filing has so much more than the my pillow guy looking to sell more pillows to MAGA folks who can’t sleep at night.

So connecting them like you did was careless and pointless. Find another case that had an actual chance to compare, that was dismissed.

This person who filed in this case has had some victories in this arena. DJT… how many exactly?

Sometimes its the person filing that signals more legitimacy than others.

Oh how fondly we remember the four seasons.
Jeebus. I knew you were dumb but fuck.
 
Back
Top