We are prepared to accept surrender in the "culture war"

The event of interest is the event at the onset of the Younger-Dryas. The theory is that a fragmented comet struck the earth with a major impact on the Hiawatha Ice Sheet somewhere in the vicinity of Saginaw Bay, MI. with smaller fragments striking throughout the Americas and in portions of Europe. Look up Younger-Dryas Comet Strike.

This theory is still being debated among scientists but the evidence for such a strike is growing year by year.

Such an event would have had a profound impact on the racial memory of the survivors.
No such thing as racial memory. Are you able to dredge up a recollection of your ancestors struggling to survive amid riding waters, witnessing their loved ones and neighbors drowning? You can imagine it, sure, but do you have any certain grasp of the details?
 
No such thing as racial memory. Are you able to dredge up a recollection of your ancestors struggling to survive amid riding waters, witnessing their loved ones and neighbors drowning? You can imagine it, sure, but do you have any certain grasp of the details?
Flood Myths

The oral history of such an event would persist. Ancient man, not knowing the true cause of what happened would wrap a story around it if for no other reason than to preserve the oral tradition. The myths are world wide in scope.
 
Actually, that is exactly what the Right is.

How, we just want you lot to leave us the fuck alone.

You guys are the ones who can't get, do or produce anything for yourselves.

The content changes. Never before the 20th Century could there have been any political controversy over universal health care or Internet access. Never before the Industrial Revolution would any nation have gone to war to secure a "coaling station." Marx was entirely right in observing that industry had changed everything, including not only class relations but what the classes were, and that the industrial proletariat was a completely new and completely different thing, not only in function but in mentality, from both the peasantry and the old urban tradesmen.

Yes, but he was as wrong about how as the modern left is about the tech generation.
 
I sort of agree, but a key point here is that the reason they have singlemindedly focused on controlling the federal courts is to create a world where being in the minority on these issues is irrelevant.
 
That's what people like you said about abolition of slavery, women's rights, civil rights, gay rights...I could go on, but you get the point (although I'm sure you'll make a point of pretending not to).
People like me abolished slavery you fucked up idiot.
 
People like me abolished slavery you fucked up idiot.
Authoritarian leftist like YDB don't seem to understand it's us fans of liberty and individual rights, not the communist and fans of totalitarian government control who abolished slavery in the USA.
 
People like me abolished slavery you fucked up idiot.
You can't claim that by being a Republican. Had you lived then, you would have fought, if at all, in a butternut uniform -- and that applies to most of today's Pubs. The party of Abraham Lincoln has morphed into the party of Jefferson Davis. Its geographical voting base is in the old Confederacy and its ideology aligned with it.
 
Authoritarian leftist like YDB don't seem to understand it's us fans of liberty and individual rights, not the communist and fans of totalitarian government control who abolished slavery in the USA.
At the time, it was the Cornfeds who called Lincoln a tyrant; and it was at least fair to say that he expanded the power and authority of the federal government far beyond anything the FFs envisioned.
 
The reason why it would be a good thing for the RW to surrender in the "culture war," is that then we could get the whole thing out of politics and focus on what matters: Economic issues. Culture-war politics are pernicious mainly because they are a pointless distraction from that.

And, don't tell me the same good could be achieved by the left surrendering. The left cannot help but win. Because of irreversible cultural and demographic changes. I have often said, however, that it would be a good thing for the Democrats to soft-pedal the social liberalism and play up the economic populism. The one is a fight we can win without fighting; the other is a whole lot tougher, because it goes against the vested interests of the PTB who wield immense power over election outcomes. They're the ones who control the "deep state" to extent such a thing even exists. All parties in Washington, and the civil servants too, take their marching orders from Wall Street.
 
People like me abolished slavery you fucked up idiot.
Your capacity for self-delusion never fails to impress me.
If your point is that Republicans abolished slavery, that is correct. But in those days, the Republicans were the progressive party. Heck, if I were around 150 years ago, I'd be a Republican, no question about it. But things changed a very long time ago, and more to the point, the Republicans who abolished slavery were nothing whatsoever like you.
 
w3 jU$t w@nt u 2 l3@ve U$ @l0n3!

View attachment 2153461
As soon as liberals defend the right of a high school teacher to assign his class to read "Race, Evolution, and Behavior," by Professor J. Philippe Rushton," I will agree that liberals are in favor of open political discussion.

http://www.harbornet.com/folks/theedrich/JP_Rushton/Race.htm

------------

I believe a teacher should be allowed to assign this essay to his class, as long as he allows them to disagree with it. The teacher should not require agreement in return for a good grade.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top