EXTRA! EXTRA! HOT OFF THE PRESS!

What the fuck does that even mean?
It means some people will do and say anything to avoid reality and others will support them for it if that means someone/something they dislike will be tarnished as a result.
 
It means some people will do and say anything to avoid reality and others will support them for it if that means someone/something they dislike will be tarnished as a result.
It's incredibly important to you, obviously. Which is a demonstration of the purpose of the question. It did exactly what was intended.
 
It was a statement made by someone in response to a question posed by the right.

It's really important for the right.
I want to correct the record, the individual who answered that question was Aimee Arrambide *the executive director of the abortion rights nonprofit Avow Texas*, I wrote that from memory and got the sequence wrong, Doctor Robinson OBGYN refused to define what a woman is.
 
I want to correct the record, the individual who answered that question was Aimee Arrambide *the executive director of the abortion rights nonprofit Avow Texas*, I wrote that from memory and got the sequence wrong, Doctor Robinson OBGYN refused to define what a woman is.
Arpy was the one who needed the correction....but as with you...it doesn't actually matter who it was or what the meeting was about

The only thing the right wants to hear is that there are people who are freaks who want to ruin your life..because when it comes down to it, that's the irrational belief being pushed with the stupid fucking question being posed. Gender fluidity and anything non-vanilla sexual identity scares the living fuck out of trumpies.

And it's the reason why grandpa brain dummy makes a hundred posts a day about it.

It works to get them to the polls to "fight the good fight"

And the committee did not learn anything of substance toward their meeting agenda for the day with the question
 
It's incredibly important to you, obviously. Which is a demonstration of the purpose of the question. It did exactly what was intended.
Which was what? To point out how fucking stupid you are?
 
Arpy was the one who needed the correction....but as with you...it doesn't actually matter who it was or what the meeting was about

The only thing the right wants to hear is that there are people who are freaks who want to ruin your life..because when it comes down to it, that's the irrational belief being pushed with the stupid fucking question being posed. Gender fluidity and anything non-vanilla sexual identity scares the living fuck out of trumpies.

And it's the reason why grandpa brain dummy makes a hundred posts a day about it.

It works to get them to the polls to "fight the good fight"

And the committee did not learn anything of substance toward their meeting agenda for the day with the question
I accept that I was wrong in saying that a doctor made the statement. I can only go off of what I'm aware of.
 
To show that dipshits like you are motivated by fear of stupid shit and you blame others for it.
Lol. Sure chief. That's why we're not the ones trying to ban body armor or the censoring of opinions and ideas. Meanwhile on the Left...
 
Lol. Sure chief. That's why we're not the ones trying to ban body armor or the censoring of opinions and ideas. Meanwhile on the Left...
But men getting pregnant or not is the topic of discussion

And the right is the one wanting to discuss it
 
Lol. Sure chief. That's why we're not the ones trying to ban body armor or the censoring of opinions and ideas. Meanwhile on the Left...
Of course, face masks are nothing at all like body armor whatsoever.
 
But men getting pregnant or not is the topic of discussion

And the right is the one wanting to discuss it
So then let's return to the topic of discussion instead of the fun little side of your mental infirmity you keep insisting on showing off to the world.

Men are biologically incapable of "getting" pregnant. They have no bodily organs which produce eggs, nor do they have a bodily organ which is designed to gestate a fertilized egg. Further, men do not have the ability to synthesize whatever chemicals are required to avoid rejecting the "foreign" tissue which becomes a fetus.

Any medical person or administrative person of any type who says men can get pregnant (or any of the other bullshit coming from the mouths on the left regarding gender) is creating a lie designed for only 1 purpose; to spread a political narrative at the expense of the truth. Those who refuse to respond to a question regarding thier opinion on the issue, while citing that they aren't qualified to have a personal opinion, are avoiding the subject in the hopes that no one notices their obfuscation and avoidance of their mental qualifications to testify on ANY subject.

And here you are arguing in support of those who say that men can "get" pregnant and that a person who won't answer the question is somehow able to answer other questions truthfully. In order to do that you point out how often stupid people say other stupid things in order to promote "Republican talking points." As if that means that the stupid statement about how men can get pregnant still isn't stupid on its face or that a person doesn't have a PERSONAL OPINION on the subject isn't qualified to make a statement about anything at all because if you can't form a personal opinion on current events that are right there in everyone's face these days, how the fuck can you be trusted to determine what is and isn't going on other areas of our society and tell us the truth?

And then you still insist on supporting those who make such statements as being "better" than those who call it what it is. Which is akin to the head in the sand mentality of the 14% of Americans who insist that the country is on the right track and things are going great right now.

How's that for returning to the subject?
 
Last edited:
So then let's return to the topic of discussion instead of the fun little side of your mental infirmity you keep insisting on showing off to the world.

Men are biologically incapable of "getting" pregnant. They have no bodily organs which produce eggs, nor do they have a bodily organ which is designed to gestate a fertilized egg. Further, men do not have the ability to synthesize whatever chemicals are required to avoid rejecting the "foreign" tissue which becomes a fetus.

Any medical person or administrative person of any type who says men can get pregnant (or any of the other bullshit coming from the mouths on the left regarding gender) is creating a lie designed for only 1 purpose; to spread a political narrative at the expense of the truth.

And here you are arguing in support of those who say that men can "get" pregnant. In order to do that you point out how often stupid people say other stupid things in order to promote "Republican talking points." As if that means that the stupid statement about how men can get pregnant still isn't stupid on its face.

And then you still insist on supporting those who make such statements as being "better" than those who call it what it is. Which is akin to the head in the sand mentality of the 14% of Americans who insist that the country is on the right track and things are going great right now.
I get that you believe that's what I'm arguing. It's not.

My point is that the discussion only exists because the right is bringing it up. In the discussion about abortion, there is no reason to define a woman nor any reason to discuss whether men can or can't get pregnant and have abortions.The only discussion point is whether the pregnancy can and should be allowed to be terminated.....which I am absolutely support that the person who is pregnant be allowed to do so at any point in the pregnancy.

The discussion point exists because people on the right seem to believe that it's part of the discussion of moral decay in society which allows the people asking the question to score political points and excite the base going into the midterm.

Technically and medically, I assume that some advance might be made to have a pregnant man exist. If it did, then the possibility would exist for that man to have an abortion. I truly don't care whether or not it's possible and whether or not a medical professional can or cannot answer to it.

I do, however, find extreme humor that the discussion of gender fluidity appears to strike a nerve in the trumpy forum members...to the point that there are at least two threads a day created by you dipshits.
 
Liberal men like abortions especially when they know they're responsible and don't want to assume responsibility.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
Liberal men like abortions especially when they know they're responsible and don't want to assume responsibility.
how much cold medication did you take? The projection is strong with this one.
 
The most virulent defense of abortion comes from you Liberal men.
I think you obsessed with it to the point of religious fever.
__________________________________________
Democrat born. Democrat bred. Libertarian led (by Democrats).
 
I get that you believe that's what I'm arguing. It's not.

My point is that the discussion only exists because the right is bringing it up. In the discussion about abortion, there is no reason to define a woman nor any reason to discuss whether men can or can't get pregnant and have abortions.The only discussion point is whether the pregnancy can and should be allowed to be terminated.....which I am absolutely support that the person who is pregnant be allowed to do so at any point in the pregnancy.

The discussion point exists because people on the right seem to believe that it's part of the discussion of moral decay in society which allows the people asking the question to score political points and excite the base going into the midterm.

Technically and medically, I assume that some advance might be made to have a pregnant man exist. If it did, then the possibility would exist for that man to have an abortion. I truly don't care whether or not it's possible and whether or not a medical professional can or cannot answer to it.

I do, however, find extreme humor that the discussion of gender fluidity appears to strike a nerve in the trumpy forum members...to the point that there are at least two threads a day created by you dipshits.
So in a discussion about abortion you believe the fact that only women can have one is irrelevant. Got it.

Yet here we are with "experts" testifying about abortion and saying that they can't define "woman." "Experts being proffered by "the left", and not conservatives who are merely pointing out that it's nearly impossible to discuss a subject if half of the participants can't define what the subject is yet promote themselves as "experts" on the subject.

And then of course you come along and try to tell us it's the conservatives who are the problem in the discussion because somehow the subject, or an ancillary thereof, "strikes a nerve."

You really, really, must be fucking stupid if that passes muster in whatever process you call reasoning.
 
So in a discussion about abortion you believe the fact that only women can have one is irrelevant. Got it.

Yet here we are with "experts" testifying about abortion and saying that they can't define "woman." "Experts being proffered by "the left", and not conservatives who are merely pointing out that it's nearly impossible to discuss a subject if half of the participants can't define what the subject is yet promote themselves as "experts" on the subject.

And then of course you come along and try to tell us it's the conservatives who are the problem in the discussion because somehow the subject, or an ancillary thereof, "strikes a nerve."

You really, really, must be fucking stupid if that passes muster in whatever process you call reasoning.
In the case of abortions, ending the pregnancy is the discussion.

You believe whether someone can define a woman or wether a man can become pregnant is important....of course you do...because you're a dipshit who only wants to talk about your political opposition. The question worked on you.

The expert you speak of is the head of an abortion advocacy group Whether a man can get pregnant isn't involved at all in her job. And the question had nothing to do with her expertise.

So cry about how this bothers you....make four more threads about the topic....it demonstrates my point well
 
Back
Top