EXTRA! EXTRA! HOT OFF THE PRESS!

Technically if they get pregnant then they can get abortions to terminate that pregnancy.

It doesn't mean they can.
 
Honestly, based on the number of threads created about the topic, it seems very important to the right.
 
Honestly, based on the number of threads created about the topic, it seems very important to the right.
It was a statement made by a female doctor testifying before congress not just some casual discussion on MSDNC.
 
It was a statement made by a female doctor testifying before congress not just some casual discussion on MSDNC.
It was a statement made by someone in response to a question posed by the right.

It's really important for the right.
 
It was a statement made by someone in response to a question posed by the right.

It's really important for the right.
No! it was a statement made by a *DOCTOR*, by a democrat radical pro-abortion witness selected by Jerry Nadler and the dem side of the house judiciary. It's not the question that should concern us it's the radical answer, a belief that men can be women and women can be men. So if a pregnant women can declare herself a man where does the madness end. So does that translate maybe some future date a women can identify as a cow and get an abortion from a vet. You don't see a contradiction to biological science here. These radical abortion activist will say and do anything.
 
No! it was a statement made by a *DOCTOR*, by a democrat radical pro-abortion witness selected by Jerry Nadler and the dem side of the house judiciary. It's not the question that should concern us it's the radical answer, a belief that men can be women and women can be men. So if a pregnant women can declare herself a man where does the madness end. So does that translate maybe some future date a women can identify as a cow and get an abortion from a vet. You don't see a contradiction to biological science here. These radical abortion activist will say and do anything.
It was an abortion advocate responding to a direct question. There wasn't any reason for the question except to make the rounds on right wing media.

But yah...I'm sure a man getting pregnant or getting an abortion is extremely important and needs to be addressed immediately...else our world will fall apart...lmao
 
Truth is always really important.
The question has nothing to do with "truth". It literally has to do with fear.mongering....as this thread demonstrates quite well.

"They are coming for you"..the constant drum beat of the culture war right. Vote red, else the people who are evil will be in charge

Bonus fear points if you bring up the children
 
The question has nothing to do with "truth". It literally has to do with fear.mongering....as this thread demonstrates quite well.

"They are coming for you"..the constant drum beat of the culture war right. Vote red, else the people who are evil will be in charge

Bonus fear points if you bring up the children
This is bullshit.

Men cannot "get" pregnant. Nor can they "have" abortions. Don't believe me? Then tell us what medical devices have been developed and are used during a "male abortion"? What tests and procedures are used to determine if a man is "pregnant"? What male bodily organs exist for the purpose of gestating the fetus to term?


Any medical doctor saying that men can get pregnant and have abortions has made a false statement of fact sufficient to have their medical license revoked for gross incompetence and malpractice.
 
This is bullshit.

Men cannot "get" pregnant. Nor can they "have" abortions. Don't believe me? Then tell us what medical devices have been developed and are used during a "male abortion"? What tests and procedures are used to determine if a man is "pregnant"? What male bodily organs exist for the purpose of gestating the fetus to term?


Any medical doctor saying that men can get pregnant and have abortions has made a false statement of fact sufficient to have their medical license revoked for gross incompetence and malpractice.
And what was the actual reason for the meeting being conducted which required that question to be asked?

You don't even know, nor do you care, enough to understand who answered the question. (Hint: it wasn't a doctor)
 
And what was the actual reason for the meeting being conducted which required that question to be asked?

You don't even know, nor do you care, enough to understand who answered the question. (Hint: it wasn't a doctor)
Lol.

Let's say you're an "expert" testifying before Congress. As part of your bona fides you're asked a question that you answer with bullshit based ideology rather than a response based in scientific fact.

Given your answer, are you indeed an "expert" who is qualified to truthfully testify on ANY subject?

The truth matters. It matter most when establishing credibility.
 
Lol.

Let's say you're an "expert" testifying before Congress. As part of your bona fides you're asked a question that you answer with bullshit based ideology rather than a response based in scientific fact.

Given your answer, are you indeed an "expert" who is qualified to truthfully testify on ANY subject?

The truth matters. It matter most when establishing credibility.
That was an extremely long non-answer to my question.

Who was asked the question and what did it have to do with the committee topic?
 
That was an extremely long non-answer to my question.

Who was asked the question and what did it have to do with the committee topic?
Lol.

You still haven't figured out what voir dire means have you.
 
So continued non-answer.

Got it
I gave you an answer. The fact that you refuse to consider it, and instead inject your insipience into the mix, is where the problem lies.

The question was designed to elicit a response. The response given shows that the witness is a fucking idiot trolling a political ideology rather than the truth. As such, the witness LIED to Congress by intentionally stating a false fact.

The reason the question was proffered was to expose this. But, instead of acknowledging that, you nod along with the bullshit artists pointing fingers at the Republicans and making claims that they're the problem instead of those who intentionally lie for profit.
 
Yep, I know the answer. But stimpy over there seems to believe the "doctor" who gave that answer should lose their license.
Lies should never be rewarded in any manner.
 
Back
Top