Republicans denounce RNC

pecksniff

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Posts
22,077
Because of the "legitimate political discourse" thing.

More than 140 Republican leaders and ex-officials from the bipartisan Renew America Movement denounced the RNC on Monday for censuring Reps. Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, "condemning two principled elected leaders while condoning conspiracies, lies, and violent insurrection.”

The list of signers is eclectic – Never Trumpers and no-longer Trumpers, conservatives and moderates, strategists and onetime public servants, former senators and House members, and former Govs. Mark Sanford of South Carolina, Christie Todd Whitman of New Jersey and William Weld of Massachusetts.

“How could we be here, where what is the obvious truth by any measure is being conveyed as non-truth by a governing body of a major political party?” Sanford wondered. The censure of Cheney and Kinzinger, he told me in an interview, is like “something out of George Orwell or a really bad sci-fi movie.”

Or maybe Kafka.
 
This is just the latest manifestation of an internal struggle that has been going on in the GOP at least since the Tea Party emerged.

Best thing for the country is if the Tea Party/Trumper side definitively and permanently loses. I cannot say "is purged" because the American party system has no mechanism for expelling members.
 
Not many more in the Lincoln Project, but it certainly made a difference in 2020. You ignore the Old Guard at your peril.

Who's being censured?

Who's getting shit on and taken a fuckin' beating in the last 3 election cycles??

The Old Guard "Anything you Democrats want just slow down a smidgen!! And for the love of gawd don't call me a racist for the 10,000th time!!! " Republicans who are more concerned with what Democrats and the readers of Salon/RAW in other states have to say about them then their own constituents.

They are all but flailing for support from the Democrats who would NEVER vote for them and they're going to get replaced :)
 
Last edited:
The Old Guard "anything you Democrats want just slow down a smidgen!!" Republicans.

:rolleyes: The Old Guard are stubbornly obstructionist of anything the Dems initiate (even when it was their own idea to begin with, as with the ACA, based on a Heritage Foundation proposal and Romney's reforms in Massachusetts), and have been at least since 1994.
 
Not many more in the Lincoln Project, but it certainly made a difference in 2020. You ignore the Old Guard at your peril.

Dude the Lincoln Project was a grift from the get-go. The ads didn't do anything and the whole project was a sham to separate dopes from their money.

The RNC is just moving towards where the base is. People like welfare queen Laruen Boebert and chilled tomato soup lover Marjorie Taylor Greene aren't in Congress to pass laws. They're in Congress to mooch off the tax payers, get on TV, and generally be awful people.
 
:rolleyes: The Old Guard are stubbornly obstructionist of anything the Dems initiate (even when it was their own idea to begin with, as with the ACA, based on a Heritage Foundation proposal and Romney's reforms in Massachusetts), and have been at least since 1994.

You don't know what you're talking about again. :D

Telling you to slow down and giving you want you want isn't obstructionism....speed bumpism at best.

And it's why the old guard republicans are getting dragged to pound town.
 
Telling you to slow down and giving you want you want isn't obstructionism....speed bumpism at best.

Nor is it what the Old Guard has been doing since 1994. Quite the reverse.

The video linked in this OP studies this point: It works like a rachet. When the Pubs are in power, everything goes their way. But then the Dems are in power, things do not go back the other way. Rather, the Dems respond to Pub obstructionism by moving their own goals and position to the right, as when Obama dropped the "public option" from the ACA before negotiations had even begun. That has happened in every Dem administration since Clinton's, and it hasn't stopped now -- there's nothing in Build Back Better that represents any real move in the direction of social democracy, and no reason for the Pubs to oppose it save that it came from a Democrat.
 
Last edited:
Nor is it what the Old Guard has been doing since 1994. Quite the reverse.

You and the handful of nuts pushing that lie are detached from reality and need to put the DMT/LSD down at best.

Tell that lie elsewhere at worst.
 
You and the handful of nuts pushing that lie are detached from reality and need to put the DMT/LSD down at best.

Tell that lie elsewhere at worst.

It is you who are always telling lies detached from reality.

You are fond of quoting from Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four. Consider this passage:

O'Brien was a being in all ways larger than himself. There was no idea that he had ever had, or could have, that O'Brien had not long ago known, examined, and rejected. His mind contained Winston's mind.

My mind contains yours. If that troubles you, consider how disgusting it is for me.
 
Last edited:
I have never caught out any of those sources in an error of fact . . . and neither have you.

All the time... they lie incessantly and produce little more than a leftist bubble and echo chamber of ignorance. :)
 
You don't know what you're talking about again. :D

Telling you to slow down and giving you want you want isn't obstructionism....speed bumpism at best.

And it's why the old guard republicans are getting dragged to pound town.

You don’t think repub congress members are obstructionists when it comes to dems?
 
You don’t think repub congress members are obstructionists when it comes to dems?

In instances they can be.

But over the long term no.... they've been slowly creeping left as the (D)'eez drag them further so along the way whenever they can.

Think about where we were in the 80's vs. now. Hell, the 90's....Bill Clinton in the 90's was to the right of Trumps presidency.

Now go back to 1950....... 1900.... 1850...1800.

Do you truly think we as a nation are more right wing than we were in 2000 or any point in time before that??? :confused:
 
In instances they can be.

But over the long term no.... they've been slowly creeping left as the (D)'eez drag them further so along the way whenever they can.

Think about where we were in the 80's vs. now. Hell, the 90's....Bill Clinton in the 90's was to the right of Trumps presidency.

Now go back to 1950....... 1900.... 1850...1800.

Do you truly think we as a nation are more right wing than we were in 2000 or any point in time before that??? :confused:

I’m not talking long term, but modern history. To paraphrase Paul Ryan (actually, I think he really said this at some point) early in the trump administration when they held the senate and the house, “We’ve been the party of obstruction for so long we’ve forgotten how to govern. And they mostly continue to obstruct instead of reaching across the aisle to compromise and get stuff done.


“We were a 10-year opposition party, where being against things was easy to do,” said Ryan in a post-mortem press conference. “You just had to be against it. Now, in three months’ time, we tried to go to a governing party where we actually had to get 216 people to agree with each other on how we do things.” It was, he said, “the growing pains of government.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapo...still-learning-how-to-govern/?sh=ba515f5168f5
 
In instances they can be.

But over the long term no.... they've been slowly creeping left as the (D)'eez drag them further so along the way whenever they can.

Think about where we were in the 80's vs. now. Hell, the 90's....Bill Clinton in the 90's was to the right of Trumps presidency.

Now go back to 1950....... 1900.... 1850...1800.

Do you truly think we as a nation are more right wing than we were in 2000 or any point in time before that??? :confused:

I’m not talking long term, but modern history. To paraphrase Paul Ryan (actually, I think he really said this at some point) early in the trump administration when they held the senate and the house, “We’ve been the party of obstruction for so long we’ve forgotten how to govern.” And they mostly continue to obstruct instead of reaching across the aisle to compromise and get stuff done.


“We were a 10-year opposition party, where being against things was easy to do,” said Ryan in a post-mortem press conference. “You just had to be against it. Now, in three months’ time, we tried to go to a governing party where we actually had to get 216 people to agree with each other on how we do things.” It was, he said, “the growing pains of government.”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapo...still-learning-how-to-govern/?sh=ba515f5168f5
 
I’m not talking long term, but modern history.

Yes I understand the left likes to focus on single instances because that supports the obstructionist narrative as we slide slowly but surely left.

Republicans effectively "obstruct" like editors and proof readers "obstruct" literary authors and do nothing the other direction to further any RW anything. They have been for 30ish years a bunch of do-nothing weenies.

To paraphrase Paul Ryan (actually, I think he really said this at some point) early in the trump administration when they held the senate and the house, “We’ve been the party of obstruction for so long we’ve forgotten how to govern. And they mostly continue to obstruct instead of reaching across the aisle to compromise and get stuff done.

Paul was a politician and he was trying to appeal to the populist and moderates.

IMO he wasn't entirely wrong, the "old guard" or establishment GOP left over after the cold war had and still has no fucking clue how to govern. "No, but if you get rid of this and that, maybe." leading to a slow and steady slide left is the very best the (R)'s have offered.

That changed in 2016..... The party of " No....but maybe if you get rid of a few things." (R)'s left over from the 1980's like Mitch and those who support their do nothing weenie style of legislating like Darth Cheney's Daughter? They're rapidly on their way out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top