White sacrificial lambs convicted

The verdicts were spot on. Of the three only Bryan had a defense, a very weak defense, but a defense.
 
So I guess now that when BLACKS come to town and LOOT STORES

The PVT SECURITY will not stop or detain em cause they will be going to jail?

Do we let the BLACKS just take over?

JUNGLE STYLE?
 
the "dead" BLACK guy was seen often in that area casing out the place and STEALING and the COPS knew and did NOTHING

the BLACK WATCHERS had every right to make a citizens arrest

the first 2 DA's refused to prosecute cause they had no justification for prosecution

only when BLACKS looted America, did a 3rd one make these 3 SACRIFICIIAL LAMBS
 
you "people" who are happy with the results are trying to have the BLACKS BURN YOU



LAST
 
By all accounts, just like Rittenhouse, they received a fair trial.

The real sacrificial lambs were run down by the rhetoric of #BLM.



Funny, how the one exception to the rule is held up as proof
of the mindset of everyone of his race, unless he is black...
 
so lets reverse the situation

white guy is seen prowling and stealing from homes for weeks on end (as the "dead" black did)


Black NEIGHBORHOOD WATCHERS chase him and he runs and they believe he is a threat and shoot him

and

TWO DA'S dont prosecute and a 3rd does

wouldnt the CRAZED (arent they all?) BLACKS scream

RACISM>

YES!
 
By all accounts, just like Rittenhouse, they received a fair trial.

The real sacrificial lambs were run down by the rhetoric of #BLM.



Funny, how the one exception to the rule is held up as proof
of the mindset of everyone of his race, unless he is black...

yes....all Im saying

is the case isnt as simple as we seem to think it is

and as I outlines above

switch the races

would BLACKS be on trial?

NO!
 
It is the point because it's relevant to the law. The Georgia law, not the one in your head.

There was no evidence that he stole anything. Therefore he was guilty of (at most) trespass - a misdemeanor. Georgia law at the time, did not allow a private citizen to make a "citizen's arrest" for a misdemeanor. Even if he did steal something, the law required that the defendants would have had to have observed the crime.
 
^^^Coddles criminals....^^^advocates LIFE IN JAIL for BLOCK WATCHERS


why did the 2nd DA say he saw NO EVIDENCE of a crime?

I axe 2nd not 1st
 
Are you talking about the one that was indicted for shielding the defendants because of their relationship with her office?

I don't know. Other than a DA is a government lawyer and government lawyers were C students at lower-tier law schools. Maybe the second DA didn't understand the law?
 
Are you talking about the one that was indicted for shielding the defendants because of their relationship with her office?

I don't know. Other than a DA is a government lawyer and government lawyers were C students at lower-tier law schools. Maybe the second DA didn't understand the law?

No


Thats why I axed YOU...the BLOCK WATCHER HATER and RAMPANT LOOTER LOVER about the SECOND DA


But of course "you" feel the need to muddy the waters for nefarious reasons
 
^^^Coddles criminals....^^^advocates LIFE IN JAIL for BLOCK WATCHERS


why did the 2nd DA say he saw NO EVIDENCE of a crime?

I axe 2nd not 1st

obviously Johnny (BLOCK WATCHER HATER) decided to answer the FIRST not the 2nd I axed

and

we KNOW why
 
Back
Top