Chasing The White Man?

[Baztrachian]

Now apply that ^ to DONOLD TRUMP, you fucking imbecile.

Insults like this work better if you can spell Donald Trump's name right.

 

[Lazaran]

Insults like this work better if you can spell Donald Trump's name right.

Pay attention, fuckwit.

Don + OLD = DonOLD or “DONOLD” in all-caps (although I usually go with “DonOld” as an insult).

Hope that ^ helps, fuckwit.





We. Told. Them. So.

 

[Rightguide]

Insults like this work better if you can spell Donald Trump's name right.

After a lifetime spent in the checkout line of life, they’ve grown a bit jaded and irritable, especially when every time they glance up from their phones, they're greeted not by dignity or decorum, but by a protruding display of someone’s fanny just a nose's length away.

 

[NightBirdNYC]

the only things white American evangelicals feed people are misinformation, false hope and easy solutions

I think Carlin put it exceedingly well!

 

[stxjimmy]

I think Carlin put it exceedingly well!

Bravo a great video

 

[YDB95]

What the actual fuck are you on about, dipshit?

Those are all very popular talking points on the right, for reassuring themselves that they're not racist for voting for the party of the Southern Strategy. As usual, there's a whole lot of projection, too.

 

[DeluxAuto]

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/cutting-edge-leadership/201811/the-5-steps-dehumanization

If you don't like the accusation then don't be fitting of it.

The picture that I didn't take nor was the subject of, that has nothing to do with your idiotic rant, is supposed to be me?

There's crack psych then there crackhead psych. You fit the latter.

 

[Chernosoth]

Europeans in Africa are becoming a moot point. Europeans can't maintain a European population in Europe. All that infrastructure that uses fossil fuels on both continents will be scrapped. The older infrastructure made for horses and oxen could last a few more centuries.

 

[Politruk]

Europeans in Africa are becoming a moot point. Europeans can't maintain a European population in Europe. All that infrastructure that uses fossil fuels on both continents will be scrapped. The older infrastructure made for horses and oxen could last a few more centuries.

The world is not about to run short of petroleum, is it?

 

[Chernosoth]

Centuries or millennia of accumulated farming knowledge became scarce where Africans were not allowed to farm. Relearning that knowledge is as hard as it is anywhere for urban populations deindustrializing and moving back to the land.

 

[YDB95]

Relearning that knowledge is as hard as it is anywhere for urban populations deindustrializing and moving back to the land.

Baloney it is. We know a lot more about good agricultural practices now than centuries ago.

 

[Politruk]

Centuries or millennia of accumulated farming knowledge became scarce where Africans were not allowed to farm. Relearning that knowledge is as hard as it is anywhere for urban populations deindustrializing and moving back to the land.

Why would urban populations deindustrialize?

 

[PaxNurgle]

I have my own spin and that is that the new black leaders of the former Africa colonies were trying to emulate what they thought the white colonialists were doing, ie stealing from the people and theft and graft are a lot easier than building things. And if you look around you see that the leaders of those nations are busy inflating their own bank accounts as quickly as possible. Kenya may end up being a bright spot in the sub-Saharan region.

This is EXACTLY what Trump is doing in the U.S.

And yet you not only turn a blind eye to it but you actually PRAISE him for it.

Mind.... BLOWN. The utter hypocrisy and stupidity at work here. And ironically your insight into corrupt third world leaders is actually fairly spot on! So why can't you see that this is happening right here in the US?

 

[ll74]

I think Carlin put it exceedingly well!

Religion is fucking stupid

 

[Baztrachian]

Religion is fucking stupid

I agree.

Here are two definitions of religion:

1. A particular variety of such belief, especially when organized into a system of doctrine and practice.

2. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.

Myself, I sometimes speak to religious thinking, which is not about whether someone believes in God or Islam or whatever but that their thinking is not entirely logical and instead is reliant upon illogical beliefs for substantiation.

In this regard a lot of things become religious to various people.

An unfounded belief that a sports team is 'the best' or that a particular brand of product is somehow 'the best' when it is no different from any other.

It's also when people attribute supernatural qualities to people or things in order to substantiate a broader belief system.

Like believing that socialism/communism might be successful someday regardless of how many times it failed.

Or continuing to believe that a mere paper mask will ward off viruses when there is no such science to assert this unfounded belief.

People who proudly assert that they don't believe in God fall into two camps:

1. Those who don't care and are indifferent to religion.
2. Those who have made atheism into a religion unto itself and are bent on evangelizing their atheistic religion.

Bottom line is people make things into religions because there is something in the human mind or spirit that has a need to believe and if we do not believe in God then we replace God with something else.

 

[NightBirdNYC]

While there are certainly those who might disagree with me, Trump, a draft dodging daddy’s boy gifted with an intellect and worldview of a potted plant, isn’t calling the shots here. He nothing more than a textbook sociopath, and sociopaths are in it for themselves. He is simply, out of self interest, following the roadmap set out by the “Heritage” Foundation’s Project 2025, many of its authors now in the White House. While I’ve only read a third of its 900 pages so far, I think it’s high time to address the proverbial “elephant in the room”.
According to the Census Bureau, within a a little less than 20 yrs, “white” Americans will no longer comprise the “Majority” in the US, and this sends shivers down their spines. Sadly, these are the last gasps of those who feel threatened by this unalterable statistical fact. They can’t stop it, but one might posit that they might have thought of it before they marginalized so many who have been woven in to the precious and storied tapestry of our country. Just my two cents!

 

[ll74]

I agree.

Here are two definitions of religion:

1. A particular variety of such belief, especially when organized into a system of doctrine and practice.

2. A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader.

Myself, I sometimes speak to religious thinking, which is not about whether someone believes in God or Islam or whatever but that their thinking is not entirely logical and instead is reliant upon illogical beliefs for substantiation.

In this regard a lot of things become religious to various people.

An unfounded belief that a sports team is 'the best' or that a particular brand of product is somehow 'the best' when it is no different from any other.

It's also when people attribute supernatural qualities to people or things in order to substantiate a broader belief system.

Like believing that socialism/communism might be successful someday regardless of how many times it failed.

Or continuing to believe that a mere paper mask will ward off viruses when there is no such science to assert this unfounded belief.

People who proudly assert that they don't believe in God fall into two camps:

1. Those who don't care and are indifferent to religion.
2. Those who have made atheism into a religion unto itself and are bent on evangelizing their atheistic religion.

Bottom line is people make things into religions because there is something in the human mind or spirit that has a need to believe and if we do not believe in God then we replace God with something else.

Lol. You don't agree with me ... You hate that science disagrees with your bullshit and want to make it the same thing.

Sorry, my dude, not the same thing

 

[Politruk]

Or continuing to believe that a mere paper mask will ward off viruses when there is no such science to assert this unfounded belief.

The mask blocks water droplets. The virus can't spread without them.

 

[Rightguide]

Europeans in Africa are becoming a moot point. Europeans can't maintain a European population in Europe. All that infrastructure that uses fossil fuels on both continents will be scrapped. The older infrastructure made for horses and oxen could last a few more centuries.

Everything they built in Africa will be destroyed, according to the Africans quoted in post #1.

 

[Rightguide]

Historically, the Africans built a lot of it.

BS, they're destroying it. Listen to those who actually come from there in Post #1.

 

[Rightguide]

Look at the Bronx, years ago it was a nice working neighborhood. Now it's a bomb crater.

 

[Politruk]

Like believing that socialism/communism might be successful someday regardless of how many times it failed.

"Socialism always fails" is a stupid argument.

 

[Politruk]

BS, they're destroying it. Listen to those who actually come from there in Post #1.

There is no sense in which Africans or their descendants are "tearing down" any country outside Africa.

 

[ll74]

Look at the Bronx, years ago it was a nice working neighborhood. Now it's a bomb crater.

When is the last time you've been to the Bronx?

 

[Politruk]

Look at the Bronx, years ago it was a nice working neighborhood. Now it's a bomb crater.

For complicated and non-racial reasons.

From the mid-1960s to the early 1980s, the quality of life changed for some Bronx residents. Historians and social scientists have suggested many factors, including the theory that Robert Moses' Cross Bronx Expressway destroyed existing residential neighborhoods and created instant slums, as put forward in Robert Caro's biography The Power Broker.[62] Another factor in the Bronx's decline may have been the development of high-rise housing projects, particularly in the South Bronx.[63] Yet another factor may have been a reduction in the real estate listings and property-related financial services offered in some areas of the Bronx, such as mortgage loans or insurance policies—a process known as redlining. Others have suggested a "planned shrinkage" of municipal services, such as fire-fighting.[64][65][66] There was also much debate as to whether rent control laws had made it less profitable (or more costly) for landlords to maintain existing buildings with their existing tenants than to abandon or destroy those buildings.[citation needed]

In the 1970s, parts of the Bronx were plagued by a wave of arson. The burning of buildings was predominantly in the poorest communities, such as the South Bronx. One explanation of this event was that landlords decided to burn their low property-value buildings and take the insurance money, as it was easier for them to get insurance money than to try to refurbish a dilapidated building or sell a building in a severely distressed area.[67] The Bronx became identified with a high rate of poverty and unemployment, which was mainly a persistent problem in the South Bronx.[68] There were cases where tenants set fire to the building they lived in so they could qualify for emergency relocations by city social service agencies to better residences, sometimes being relocated to other parts of the city.

Out of 289 census tracts in the Bronx borough, 7 tracts lost more than 97% of their buildings to arson and abandonment between 1970 and 1980; another 44 tracts had more than 50% of their buildings meet the same fate. By the early 1980s, the Bronx was considered the most blighted urban area in the country, particularly the South Bronx which experienced a loss of 60% of the population and 40% of housing units. However, starting in the 1990s, many of the burned-out and run-down tenements were replaced by new housing units.[68]