Rightguide
Prof Triggernometry
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2017
- Posts
- 69,030
And then gushing about how CRT gives her a WAP.
She is the biggest nut case on cable news. A first generation American failure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And then gushing about how CRT gives her a WAP.
I gave you the chance to clarify whatever you were doing, and you muffed it.I think i was clear about what I was doing there, though you lack even the rudimentary scraps of honesty to admit it.
I gave you the chance to clarify whatever you were doing, and you muffed it.
And "it's a racist dog whistle" quote the slimy lounge lizard running for Governor of Virginia, Terry Mac.
Meanwhile, in Virginia, the Virginia Department of Education is pushing CRT as a tool for discussing race in VA schools.
https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/s...critical-race-theory-despite-mcauliffe-claim/
Your word problem has nothing to do with history.It was obvious. If I have to explain it, you'll never understand anyway.
Your word problem has nothing to do with history.
Or, your word problem has nothing to do with CRT.
Or, CRT has nothing to do with history.
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.The point, other than the one on top of your head, is that when one teaches math, a subtext can also be communicated, and that this is how CRT is being taught without textbooks and worksheets emblazoned with "CRT."
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.
The racism in the occupation of native land is pretty damn blatant.
Yet you object to teaching about it.
It’s true; what you are is obvious.
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.
No adult liberal uses terms like whitey or thinks whites are evil.
No adult liberal uses terms like whitey or thinks whites are evil.

So all of those teachers and professors saying we need to do away with "whiteness" (whatever that is) don't exist?
So all of those teachers and professors saying we need to do away with "whiteness" (whatever that is) don't exist?
No they do not exist. Thank you for asking so I could be clear.
They exist....they don't speak for anyone but themselves.
Just like you don't speak for anybody but yourself
No they don't exist, at least not in significant numbers.
So I had to make the effort to explain it to you, and save you the bother. You’re welcome.Finally, someone gets CRT right! Welll done! And then CRT says that all American institutions that are not specifically and pointedly "anti-racist" are thusly configured.
Here's the problem: Just because racially unbalanced outcomes arise does not mean those institutions are racist, which CRT goes on to conclude, using only the imbalances as evidence. That's a circular argument and means CRT is an intellectual house of cards.
The left is playing dumb on the ubiquity of its radical ideology in our schools.
https://americanmind.org/salvo/denying-crt/
Defenders of CRT who deny that the discipline is being taught to young children are correct in a narrow sense: few, if any, public schools are teaching scholars like Crenshaw, Delgado, or Freire in K-12 curricula. But the ideology’s core concepts are an influential force in public education and underlie the design of course material from inception to evaluation. To claim otherwise is like saying a dinner includes no salt because there isn’t a salt course. CRT can influence every decisions within schools—curricula, behavior policies, instructional practices, and the like—even if high school students don’t read lengthy monographs of legal theory.
So I had to make the effort to explain it to you, and save you the bother. You’re welcome.
Now you’re throwing this other crap about conclusions and circular reasoning. Critical Race Theory is a theory. Any conclusion you made, you made yourself.