"CRT isn't taught in Virginia"

It was obvious. If I have to explain it, you'll never understand anyway.
Your word problem has nothing to do with history.

Or, your word problem has nothing to do with CRT.

Or, CRT has nothing to do with history.
 
Your word problem has nothing to do with history.

Or, your word problem has nothing to do with CRT.

Or, CRT has nothing to do with history.

The point, other than the one on top of your head, is that when one teaches math, a subtext can also be communicated, and that this is how CRT is being taught without textbooks and worksheets emblazoned with "CRT."
 
The point, other than the one on top of your head, is that when one teaches math, a subtext can also be communicated, and that this is how CRT is being taught without textbooks and worksheets emblazoned with "CRT."
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.

The racism in the occupation of native land is pretty damn blatant. Yet you object to teaching about it. It’s true; what you are is obvious.
 
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.

And then advocates for racism to get that equity of outcome they cherish so much.

The racism in the occupation of native land is pretty damn blatant.

From a loony toons SJW perspective maybe.

But for sane people there is nothing racist about being born in and living in N. America just because some fucked up shit happened 150-400 years ago to the people who conquered the place before Europeans came in and conquered them.

Yet you object to teaching about it.

About history?? Nobody is objecting to history.

They're objecting to the absolutely psychotic "WHitey is EVIL then and EVIL today!!! And the only way to rectify the wrongs of the past is to punish their decedents in the present!!! " racist slant you want to put on the history lesson.

It’s true; what you are is obvious.

Not a racist fuckwit?? I'm sure he appreciates that.
 
CRT states that policies and institutions that aren’t blatantly racist can still cause racially unbalanced outcomes.

Finally, someone gets CRT right! Welll done! And then CRT says that all American institutions that are not specifically and pointedly "anti-racist" are thusly configured.

Here's the problem: Just because racially unbalanced outcomes arise does not mean those institutions are racist, which CRT goes on to conclude, using only the imbalances as evidence. That's a circular argument and means CRT is an intellectual house of cards.
 
.
Pud's CRT(Critical Race Tourettes) is caused by his last remaining brain cell spasmodically firing off as it tries to memory hole America's well documented white racist history that has resulted in the CURRENT gross disparities between races.

I would almost pity Pud if he wasn't so deplorable.

JFC

SAD!!!

:D
 
Just to return to the topic of the thread as an indication of how the Republicans operated in Virginia during this gubernatorial election, CRT is NOT taught in Virginia, and Youngkin and his campaign staff knew that when they used it to energize the Republican ignorant and prejudice base. That's the sort of administration we will have in Virginia for a while now--the manipulation of an ignorant base with lies. Nor was McAuliffe opposed to parents having input into their children's education (beyond the fact they could send them to private schools--there's a whole lot of them in Virginia still existent from when they were created to resist integration of the schools in the 60s--if they wanted more rightest say in the indoctrination of their children).
 
So all of those teachers and professors saying we need to do away with "whiteness" (whatever that is) don't exist?

They exist....they don't speak for anyone but themselves.

Just like you don't speak for anybody but yourself
 
They exist....they don't speak for anyone but themselves.

Just like you don't speak for anybody but yourself

Just themselves...and the massive, billion-dollar teachers' unions that have vowed to protect them.
 
We live in a country of 330 million if even .1% spew the crap you say they do (and I highly doubt its that high) you could fill a screen stories. Doesn't mean there are enough that se should give a shit about. But you're a racist piece of shit who hunts down these stories so you can be pissed.
 
The left is playing dumb on the ubiquity of its radical ideology in our schools.

https://americanmind.org/salvo/denying-crt/

Defenders of CRT who deny that the discipline is being taught to young children are correct in a narrow sense: few, if any, public schools are teaching scholars like Crenshaw, Delgado, or Freire in K-12 curricula. But the ideology’s core concepts are an influential force in public education and underlie the design of course material from inception to evaluation. To claim otherwise is like saying a dinner includes no salt because there isn’t a salt course. CRT can influence every decisions within schools—curricula, behavior policies, instructional practices, and the like—even if high school students don’t read lengthy monographs of legal theory.
 
Finally, someone gets CRT right! Welll done! And then CRT says that all American institutions that are not specifically and pointedly "anti-racist" are thusly configured.

Here's the problem: Just because racially unbalanced outcomes arise does not mean those institutions are racist, which CRT goes on to conclude, using only the imbalances as evidence. That's a circular argument and means CRT is an intellectual house of cards.
So I had to make the effort to explain it to you, and save you the bother. You’re welcome.

Now you’re throwing this other crap about conclusions and circular reasoning. Critical Race Theory is a theory. Any conclusion you made, you made yourself.
 
The left is playing dumb on the ubiquity of its radical ideology in our schools.

https://americanmind.org/salvo/denying-crt/

Defenders of CRT who deny that the discipline is being taught to young children are correct in a narrow sense: few, if any, public schools are teaching scholars like Crenshaw, Delgado, or Freire in K-12 curricula. But the ideology’s core concepts are an influential force in public education and underlie the design of course material from inception to evaluation. To claim otherwise is like saying a dinner includes no salt because there isn’t a salt course. CRT can influence every decisions within schools—curricula, behavior policies, instructional practices, and the like—even if high school students don’t read lengthy monographs of legal theory.

The right is playing dumb on it's incessant ranting about the bullshit of the white struggle
 
So I had to make the effort to explain it to you, and save you the bother. You’re welcome.

Now you’re throwing this other crap about conclusions and circular reasoning. Critical Race Theory is a theory. Any conclusion you made, you made yourself.

I've been saying this about CRT for months, and all your vacuum-skulled pals said I was all wet (though they never really provided a supported definition themselves). You finally are the first southpaw to get it right.

So what's the "theory" about Critical Race Theory?
 
Back
Top