Shaking the guys…

I remain highly-skeptical of what is it that article.

I can imagine someone asking their father when he's on his deathbed, "Dad, tell me about how I was conceived."

He replies, "Well, many years ago I read an article from some outfit online called The James Dyson Award dot org. And I rather foolishly followed their advice about contraception. And, thus, you were the result."
 
Silly, OP, posting something that suggests men be responsible for birth control. What are you thinking?
 
I remain highly-skeptical of what is it that article.

I can imagine someone asking their father when he's on his deathbed, "Dad, tell me about how I was conceived."

He replies, "Well, many years ago I read an article from some outfit online called The James Dyson Award dot org. And I rather foolishly followed their advice about contraception. And, thus, you were the result."

The James Dyson award should be for sucking.
 
Silly, OP, posting something that suggests men be responsible for birth control. What are you thinking?

Yes, men would have to think about consequences, have concern for others, and be concerned about the future to worry with birth control. "But baby, condoms don't feel good," sob sob.
 
This device actually follows research done decades ago using forced-air heaters, hot-water baths and (don't scream) microwaves. Those worked but the project, unsurprisingly, never went any further.

The scrotum is there to keep sperm count high because testes must be kept below body temperature to function effectively. Artificially heating the boys will indeed reduce sperm count. So, maybe, but I can see some issues:

1. Men are, perhaps understandably, 'protective' and one can sense the 'market resistance' in the comments already.

2. It reminds me of the early contraceptive pills, where forgetting one, sometimes taking it later-than-normal in the day might compromise protection. This gizmo would have to be 100% effective, completely shutting down sperm production. It only takes one wriggler...

3. This would have to be used regularly, without fail. Assuming that it works, I can see it being used by a couple who aren't ready for uterine parasites just yet. I cannot see any rational fertile woman trusting the word of a just-met man or a ONS partner than he really did 'boil the boys' this morning.

4. This would provide no protection against STIs. Back to a committed couple...
 
Last edited:
I always tie mine in a half hitch around my upper thigh. Works all the time. ;)
 
I always tie mine in a half hitch around my upper thigh. Works all the time. ;)

Reminds me of a cartoon in a playboy or penthouse I saw in my father-in-laws collection. It shows a little girl, (12 or 13) with an evil look on her face, asking her grandfather, "Why do they call a grandfather clock ... grandfather." the Next frame, show gramps from behind and the little girl a bit in front him and to the side, "I have no idea, why?" You see his balls, swinging from under his robe about at his knees. The next frame she is giggling (it says so) and in the dialog bubble it she says, "Beats me."
 
Reminds me of a cartoon in a playboy or penthouse I saw in my father-in-laws collection. It shows a little girl, (12 or 13) with an evil look on her face, asking her grandfather, "Why do they call a grandfather clock ... grandfather."


Back in the sixties, I heard this song sung at a coffee-house, back when they were music venues. It went something like this:

"My grandfather's cock was too large for its jock
So it hung all the way to the floor (and gathered splinters)
It was longer by half than the old man himself
And it weight about thirty pounds more.

"It was hard on the morn of the day that he was born
And was always his treasure and pride
But it went... soft... never to rise again
When the old bugger died."
 
Lit needs a "like" button because I'd would have been hitting it for most of the posts on this thread. MB is killing today!

Me? I've always found they are better in her mouth. That way there is no danger of conception. ;)
 
Back
Top