Texas Abortion Law - Oh, By The Way....

Lazaran

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 14, 2020
Posts
19,985
.
A Texas doctor has openly defied the Texas abortion law and has been sued.

The ball is rolling.

👍

🇺🇸
 
.
Yeah, "NOW" you can make a legitimate argument for an injunction".

Like there wasn't a legitimate argument BEFORE.

There was such a legitimate argument for an injunction BEFORE that even Chief Justice Roberts voted in favor of it.

The only people who couldn't see right through the Texas laws language were the ultra-partisan republican "judges".

Hmmmm.......

SAD!!!
 
.
Yeah, "NOW" you can make a legitimate argument for an injunction".

Like there wasn't a legitimate argument BEFORE.

There was such a legitimate argument for an injunction BEFORE that even Chief Justice Roberts voted in favor of it.

The only people who couldn't see right through the Texas laws language were the ultra-partisan republican "judges".

Hmmmm.......

SAD!!!

So Roberts wasn't ultra-partisan because you agreed with him, but the judges you disagree with are partisan. Ok google lawyer. You can argue substance and I'll beat you on procedure every time.
 
.
The end result is all that matters.

One vote separated the law from being blocked or not.

The five most corrupt partisan republican judges currently on the court united in turning a blind eye to the obvious intellectual dishonesty of the Texas "law's" legal end run.

The current court has been irreparably damaged by that obviously corrupt partisan republican ruling , and if the day comes when the court is reformed, the Deplorables can look back on rulings like the Texas abortion "law", Citizens United, and Bush v Gore, as the reason why.

The willful complicit ignorance of those with a Deplorable bias who support the corrupt partisan republican ruling on the blocking of the Texas abortion"law" only strengthens the resolve of decent Americans to reform the court.

Well played Deplorables.

👍
 
the anti-abortionists tend to be the same anti-mask/anti-vax brigade

yet they seem to have no issues (that have been mentioned, anyway) with their stance on covid resulting in a sharp increase in post 20 week miscarriages, fetal deaths, emergency c-sections to save the mother where the baby may or may not survive and may or may not suffer with long-term health problems
 
.
The end result is all that matters.

One vote separated the law from being blocked or not.

The five most corrupt partisan republican judges currently on the court united in turning a blind eye to the obvious intellectual dishonesty of the Texas "law's" legal end run.

The current court has been irreparably damaged by that obviously corrupt partisan republican ruling , and if the day comes when the court is reformed, the Deplorables can look back on rulings like the Texas abortion "law", Citizens United, and Bush v Gore, as the reason why.

The willful complicit ignorance of those with a Deplorable bias who support the corrupt partisan republican ruling on the blocking of the Texas abortion"law" only strengthens the resolve of decent Americans to reform the court.

Well played Deplorables.

👍

No, the end result isn't what matters. Bad lawyering will cost you a case every time. Pick up a law school textbook. You should stop. You're embarrassing yourself. You don't know enough about Citizens United and Bush v. Gore to be discussing them. You only know what someone with a bias told non lawyers like you to elicit the reaction they wanted.
 
No, the end result isn't what matters. Bad lawyering will cost you a case every time. Pick up a law school textbook. You should stop. You're embarrassing yourself. You don't know enough about Citizens United and Bush v. Gore to be discussing them. You only know what someone with a bias told non lawyers like you to elicit the reaction they wanted.

Post your law school degree & bar score.
 
No, the end result isn't what matters. Bad lawyering will cost you a case every time. Pick up a law school textbook. You should stop. You're embarrassing yourself. You don't know enough about Citizens United and Bush v. Gore to be discussing them. You only know what someone with a bias told non lawyers like you to elicit the reaction they wanted.

This is not law, this is politics. All that's going on here that matters is that this kind of litigation will cause such headaches that Texans will turn against the pols who got the state into this mess. Doesn't matter how the cases come out, because there will always be more of them so long as these laws stand.
 
This is not law, this is politics. All that's going on here that matters is that this kind of litigation will cause such headaches that Texans will turn against the pols who got the state into this mess. Doesn't matter how the cases come out, because there will always be more of them so long as these laws stand.

The state of Texas is playing politics and if the people of Texas take it to on their politicians, then they deserve it. The Court still has to apply the laws and make their decisions based on procedural law and within the parameters of the state of Texas and the Constitution. Many of these abortion laws were getting blocked before the states could argue them before the Court. The Texas legislature drafted a rule that couldn't be defeated procedurally so they could make their argument before the Court. Every law is written with the intent that it will stand a challenge. The legislators in Texas put more thought into it. In the end, the law won't survive on its merits because it won't pass the undue burden in Casey.
 
.
The CUbaNTripod thinks he's smarter than the dissenting judges on the Supreme Court.

I have read extensively on the rulings in all three cases. No less of an expert than Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her vote on Bush v Gore. She also admitted that she knew it was wrong, but worried about the decision being sent back to Florida, where Jeb Bush would have ultimately enshrined his brother as President.

"Citizens United" was a cynical farce on its face.

The CUbaNTripod continues to remove all doubt.

*nods*
 
.
The CUbaNTripod thinks he's smarter than the dissenting judges on the Supreme Court.

I have read extensively on the rulings in all three cases. No less of an expert than Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her vote on Bush v Gore. She also admitted that she knew it was wrong, but worried about the decision being sent back to Florida, where Jeb Bush would have ultimately enshrined his brother as President.

"Citizens United" was a cynical farce on its face.

The CUbaNTripod continues to remove all doubt.

*nods*

No, you haven't read Bush v. Gore. If you actually read the decision in Bush v. Gore, it would make sense whether you like the decision or not; and no Sandra Day O'Conner didn't say that. She said she thinks the Court shouldn't have taken the case, but she also said that Florida screwed it up. Florida didn't have an administrative scheme to conduct the recount, was essentially making up the rules as they went along with different standard in each county being enforced arbitrarily. Courts can't rule on something, when there's no laws, or standards to guide them. Keep talking. You're letting everyone know who the partisan hack truly is.
 
Glad you realize you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

Then it should be very easy to post a counter argument. Of course you won't, because that's not what you're up to. Lowlifes like you only want to create headaches for other people. In this case a bar complaint.
 
If he knows anything about Bush v Gore, he knows that 1) the Republican majority violated their own oft-stated philosophy of states' rights to fit the election outcome they wanted, and 2) as a direct result of #1, they preemptively declared it could never be used as precedent. That's really all you need to know about that decision!
 
A lawsuit in the Texas case was fully anticipated by the architects of the law. Time will tell what happens. Probably a lot of time actually. In the meantime, the law is in place and Texans are not streaming across the border into Mexico to escape Lone Star suppression. The case to watch is Dobbs because it’s already teed up with SCOTUS. Many abortion fans are concerned Roe and Casey will be overturned. I posted a link earlier on this thread to an excellent analysis that explains why they might have good reasons to be concerned.
 
If he knows anything about Bush v Gore, he knows that 1) the Republican majority violated their own oft-stated philosophy of states' rights to fit the election outcome they wanted, and 2) as a direct result of #1, they preemptively declared it could never be used as precedent. That's really all you need to know about that decision!

The court should never have taken the case, and it obviously acted in a corrupt partisan republican manner in their final ruling.

People like The CUbaNTripod interpret pushback from decent Americans against the blatant deplorable partisan republican rulings by the court, as blind partisanship from decent Americans.

SAD!!!
 
People like The CUbaNTripod interpret pushback from decent Americans against the blatant deplorable partisan republican rulings by the court, as blind partisanship from decent Americans.

Well, it meddles with their conviction that real Americans only think like they do. That's why they're so quick to accuse the rest of us of hating America.
 
Then it should be very easy to post a counter argument. Of course you won't, because that's not what you're up to. Lowlifes like you only want to create headaches for other people. In this case a bar complaint.

Already done, which is why you were so quickly silenced.
 
Back
Top