Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Great! Hope he has to pay up.
.
Yeah, "NOW" you can make a legitimate argument for an injunction".
Like there wasn't a legitimate argument BEFORE.
There was such a legitimate argument for an injunction BEFORE that even Chief Justice Roberts voted in favor of it.
The only people who couldn't see right through the Texas laws language were the ultra-partisan republican "judges".
Hmmmm.......
SAD!!!
.
The end result is all that matters.
One vote separated the law from being blocked or not.
The five most corrupt partisan republican judges currently on the court united in turning a blind eye to the obvious intellectual dishonesty of the Texas "law's" legal end run.
The current court has been irreparably damaged by that obviously corrupt partisan republican ruling , and if the day comes when the court is reformed, the Deplorables can look back on rulings like the Texas abortion "law", Citizens United, and Bush v Gore, as the reason why.
The willful complicit ignorance of those with a Deplorable bias who support the corrupt partisan republican ruling on the blocking of the Texas abortion"law" only strengthens the resolve of decent Americans to reform the court.
Well played Deplorables.
![]()
No, the end result isn't what matters. Bad lawyering will cost you a case every time. Pick up a law school textbook. You should stop. You're embarrassing yourself. You don't know enough about Citizens United and Bush v. Gore to be discussing them. You only know what someone with a bias told non lawyers like you to elicit the reaction they wanted.
No, the end result isn't what matters. Bad lawyering will cost you a case every time. Pick up a law school textbook. You should stop. You're embarrassing yourself. You don't know enough about Citizens United and Bush v. Gore to be discussing them. You only know what someone with a bias told non lawyers like you to elicit the reaction they wanted.
This is not law, this is politics. All that's going on here that matters is that this kind of litigation will cause such headaches that Texans will turn against the pols who got the state into this mess. Doesn't matter how the cases come out, because there will always be more of them so long as these laws stand.
Post your law school degree & bar score.
Aren't you cute.
.
The CUbaNTripod thinks he's smarter than the dissenting judges on the Supreme Court.
I have read extensively on the rulings in all three cases. No less of an expert than Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said she regretted her vote on Bush v Gore. She also admitted that she knew it was wrong, but worried about the decision being sent back to Florida, where Jeb Bush would have ultimately enshrined his brother as President.
"Citizens United" was a cynical farce on its face.
The CUbaNTripod continues to remove all doubt.
*nods*
Glad you realize you don't have a clue what you're talking about.
If he knows anything about Bush v Gore, he knows that 1) the Republican majority violated their own oft-stated philosophy of states' rights to fit the election outcome they wanted, and 2) as a direct result of #1, they preemptively declared it could never be used as precedent. That's really all you need to know about that decision!
People like The CUbaNTripod interpret pushback from decent Americans against the blatant deplorable partisan republican rulings by the court, as blind partisanship from decent Americans.
Then it should be very easy to post a counter argument. Of course you won't, because that's not what you're up to. Lowlifes like you only want to create headaches for other people. In this case a bar complaint.
Glad you realize you don't have a clue what you're talking about.