A serious and frank discussion about weiners and ding-dongs

hotwords229_A

Literotica Guru
Joined
Sep 9, 2017
Posts
20,802
Let’s finally unzip our truths and erect some interesting questions.

We are going to go balls deep on the topic of COCKS.

Don’t be shy. Don’t be embarrassed and please, for the love of God, don’t fill the inbox of a woman who seems “cock positive”. If you must share, go to the ampics thread and post a link—that way there is a choice. Thanks!

Also, don’t wait for me. If you have a question about cocks, balls, etc. by all means post them. Your questions are as interesting to me as your answers (and probably better than mine).

So, first question . . .

Do you think cocks sell? We all know boobs can sell anything, but how about a nice bulge? Do you think a good meaty bulge would improve sales? If a movie has full frontal dudity in it would you be more curious about seeing it? Would it be a little too much to see a billboard of a bulge on the highway, or just what’s needed to even the playing field? Discuss.
 

Cockatars are obnoxious. Plus, why give everything away right up front? Where do you go from there? “Hi, now that you’ve seen my cock do you . . . UM . . . want to see my . . . Um, back hair?” Seems like a bad plan.

As for the bulges, I think the guy on the left is good, but the guy on the right may be carrying some kind of exotic reptile in his shorts. Might frighten the elderly. :D
 
Sex sells because...

Sex does sell... boobs or cocks. But why? It is only because the very socially sick world we live in has turned something as natural and wonderful as sex into a taboo concept. If people were not so uptight about sex and so very sexually deprived they would not be so sexually depraved. Think about it.

Sex should not sell. But the fig leaf effect has created a curiosity about what is under the fig leaf. Thus a marketable peek here and there. But in a natural world using sexual images for a marketing concept would fall flat.

In cultures where sex is viewed as natural and people are not uncomfortable being nude or having casual sex then a picture of a bulge or a boob would not be erotic - or if it was erotic it would not be something to use as a marketing tool.
 
Last edited:
Sex does sell... boobs or cocks. But why? It is only because the very socially sick world we live in has turned something as natural and wonderful as sex into a taboo concept. If people were not so uptight about sex and so very sexually deprived they would not be so sexually depraved. Think about it.

Sex should not sell. But the fig leaf effect has created a curiosity about what is under the fig leaf. Thus a marketable peek here and there. But in a natural world using sexual images for a marketing concept would fall flat.

In cultures where sex is viewed as natural and people are not uncomfortable being nude or having casual sex then a picture of a bulge or a boob would not be erotic - or if it was erotic it would not be something to use as a marketing tool.

Agreed, but I always wondered if anyone buys products because of the ads anyway. No matter how hot the model, it never makes me think that I will have that bulge, those ripped abs, or anything else. Or if I buy that car, drink that soda, or what have you then all the hot chicks will throw themselves all over me.

Ads really are nothing more than something to look at. So maybe it’s not so much if cocks or boobs sell, as much as do we want to see an even amount of bulges as we see boobs? It seems only right.
 
I was thinking about these hockey pucks of deliciousness too. Oh, how the chocolate would glaze my lips as I licked the creamy center. 😁
I am sorry but that has got me more worked up than the pics of whatever it is they are called on this thread
 
I am sorry but that has got me more worked up than the pics of whatever it is they are called on this thread
Just realised I quoted the wrong post. While the thought of Cyberella lips and the creamy centre sound lovely, it was the pic of chocolate that I was referring to!
 
Just realised I quoted the wrong post. While the thought of Cyberella lips and the creamy centre sound lovely, it was the pic of chocolate that I was referring to!

They’re really good too! I used to microwave them a little and put a scoop of ice cream on top when I was a teen.
 
As a Person of Penis I have experience what all my fellow brethren have—the dreaded “Tap”. AKA: being hit in the nuts.
https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/12414737/Construction_nut_shot.0.gif

It’s the moment we all fear, because we know it’s always just around the corner, waiting. Everything that happens to us happens to our balls.

And yet, it’s funny every single time. I’ve even laughed myself when I got hit in the sack.

The moment happens and you have maybe a two second window before the ache sets in. It is an ache that goes from the bottom of your balls, through your stomach and out your butthole. There’s really nothing funny about it, and yet, it’s always funny.

America’s Funniest Home Videos made a multi decade series out of showing guys getting hit in the clackers—and an entire nation laughed.

Why is it so funny when guys get hit in the balls?
Why do our guy friends hit each other in the balls?
If a woman was hit in the vagina I would feel terrible, but seeing a guy get hit in the testicles makes me laugh my ass off. Why?
 
Sex should not sell. But the fig leaf effect has created a curiosity about what is under the fig leaf. Thus a marketable peek here and there. But in a natural world using sexual images for a marketing concept would fall flat.

This was making me think of something. In 1969, the great Allen Funt produced the first Candid Camera movie, What Do You Say To A Naked Lady? Produced mostly in England, actually. He did several scenes centered around the male figure with the fig leaf, including one on a statue that suddenly started rotating. That was hysterical. :D

In cultures where sex is viewed as natural and people are not uncomfortable being nude or having casual sex then a picture of a bulge or a boob would not be erotic - or if it was erotic it would not be something to use as a marketing tool.

This is something I think about quite a bit. I find it very significant that Monty Python's Flying Circus had bare breasts in live-action sketches going back to 1969, but you cannot show bare breasts on American television even now (except on premium channels :rolleyes:).
 
I really thought this thread was going to be about the American obsession with the delicacy that is pig lips and arseholes.

I thought it was about hot dogs and snack cakes


Just realised I quoted the wrong post. While the thought of Cyberella lips and the creamy centre sound lovely, it was the pic of chocolate that I was referring to!

I dont know what they are but they look delish! Sold! :D:D

Yes, I realize the title is juvenile and immature, but it made me laugh when I thought of it, so . . .

My other ideas were:

Let’s have a Dickscussion
Or
How about a nice Cocksversation

I feel like I made the best decision I could under the circumstances. :cool:
 

hahahaha this is exactly who I was thinking of when I read the post.

I don't think there needs to be dick or bulge in an advertisement, unless it's for underwear/lingerie.
too many male models have come forward to say it wasn't really theirs anyway. Socks etc.

In movies. If you are going to show nude females. You should show male nudes. It wont make me watch it anymore, cause I'm sure they'd just use penis stunt double cocks. I just think it should be equal.

I'm not a size queen. So the above picture would have made me run faster than I could say "Holy fuck" That would not make me buy ANYTHING. However. I'm betting it would helps sell Viagra, or some kind of penis growth pills to insecure guys.
 
Back
Top