Male attraction to women now officially considered "misogyny"

[renard_ruse]

The emboldened Gay Movement is now admitting what many have suspected all along: the goal is to stigmatize and ultimately eliminate heterosexuality completely.

In particular they seem to have a problem with male attraction to women equating it with "hatred." Exactly how liking someone is "hatred" is never made clear of course, it just is and you must accept the premise.

One example is a bizarre article in the LA Times condemning a statute of Marilyn Monroe in Palm Springs. The weird article, which is barely coherent in many places, is quite clear in stating that finding women attractive, if least if you're a male, is both "misogyny" and "hatred of "queers"" as the article puts it.

On the other hand, of course, all other forms of attraction are wonderful, should be publically expressed and promoted, and any criticism of Alphabet Lifestyles be considered completely unacceptable.

Its easy to see what the ultimate goal of the alphabet agenda is and its definitely not tolerance.

https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...21/forever-marilyn-monroe-statue-palm-springs

 

[pecksniff]

You must admit that statue is in questionable taste.

OTOH, I have never accepted the equation of objectification with misogyny.

 

[renard_ruse]

I've often wondered why the average person doesn't care more about this lunatic extremism. I first started monitoring the ramblings of the lunatic femanist and Gay Activist radicals in college. That was when they were mostly confined to college campuses and a few neighborhoods in large cities. I couldn't understand why nobody was upset about their extremism. All I could get out of most people was a "who cares nobody pays attention to those weirdos" when I tried to warn them.

Well its clear they run the world now and are fully implementing the most extreme aspects of their beliefs, and yet still the average sheep doesn't seem to care or want to stop them. Maybe when heteros are marched into death camps people will start to care. Of course by then it will be too late.

 

[ll74]

The emboldened Gay Movement is now admitting what many have suspected all along: the goal is to stigmatize and ultimately eliminate heterosexuality completely.

In particular they seem to have a problem with male attraction to women equating it with "hatred." Exactly how liking someone is "hatred" is never made clear of course, it just is and you must accept the premise.

One example is a bizarre article in the LA Times condemning a statute of Marilyn Monroe in Palm Springs. The weird article, which is barely coherent in many places, is quite clear in stating that finding women attractive, if least if you're a male, is both "misogyny" and "hatred of "queers"" as the article puts it.

On the other hand, of course, all other forms of attraction are wonderful, should be publically expressed and promoted, and any criticism of Alphabet Lifestyles be considered completely unacceptable.

Its easy to see what the ultimate goal of the alphabet agenda is and its definitely not tolerance.

https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...21/forever-marilyn-monroe-statue-palm-springs

This is competing for the dumbest take of the day

 

[pecksniff]

Well its clear they run the world now . . .

They don't run anything but queer studies programs.

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Americans like to be offended.

 

[Rightguide]

The emboldened Gay Movement is now admitting what many have suspected all along: the goal is to stigmatize and ultimately eliminate heterosexuality completely.

In particular they seem to have a problem with male attraction to women equating it with "hatred." Exactly how liking someone is "hatred" is never made clear of course, it just is and you must accept the premise.

One example is a bizarre article in the LA Times condemning a statute of Marilyn Monroe in Palm Springs. The weird article, which is barely coherent in many places, is quite clear in stating that finding women attractive, if least if you're a male, is both "misogyny" and "hatred of "queers"" as the article puts it.

On the other hand, of course, all other forms of attraction are wonderful, should be publically expressed and promoted, and any criticism of Alphabet Lifestyles be considered completely unacceptable.

Its easy to see what the ultimate goal of the alphabet agenda is and its definitely not tolerance.

https://www.latimes.com/entertainme...21/forever-marilyn-monroe-statue-palm-springs

Yes the gay left is off it's rocker.

 

[pecksniff]

Yes the gay left is off it's rocker.

They're only "left" because the right won't support their rights. Nothing about homosexuality naturally inclines one to be a socialist or something.

 

[Rightguide]

They're only "left" because the right won't support their rights. Nothing about homosexuality naturally inclines one to be a socialist or something.

Yet the LGBTQ follow the radical Commie left. They know the force of totalitarianism is the only tool left to open the doors of the national closet and make people and their children recognize and accept the aberration and weirdness of their existence.

 

[YDB95]

Yet the LGBTQ follow the radical Commie left. They know the force of totalitarianism is the only tool left to open the doors of the national closet and make people and their children recognize and accept the aberration and weirdness of their existence.

Right, and the way you characterize them at the end of that sentence has nothing to do with it. Gotcha.

 

[Rightguide]

Right, and the way you characterize them at the end of that sentence has nothing to do with it. Gotcha.

Yes it does, but I only added that because I knew it would tighten your jaws.

 

[YDB95]

Yes it does, but I only added that because I knew it would tighten your jaws.

No, I think it shows your true colors.
Sad truth is, with most groups that overwhelmingly support Democrats, it's not so much because it's a perfect match as it is because the Republicans are a bunch of reactionary bigots.

 

[Wrong Element]

This is competing for the dumbest take of the day

Are there Renard posts about which this can't be said?


Besides, I was always under the impression gay men loved Marilyn Monroe.

 

[Rightguide]

No, I think it shows your true colors.
Sad truth is, with most groups that overwhelmingly support Democrats, it's not so much because it's a perfect match as it is because the Republicans are a bunch of reactionary bigots.

An appreciation for science and normalcy isn't bigotry.

 

[YDB95]

An appreciation for science and normalcy isn't bigotry.

Agreed. But "normalcy" isn't objective, and you're confused as to which party has "an appreciation for science".

 

[pecksniff]

An appreciation for science and normalcy isn't bigotry.

Science tells us homosexuality is normalcy for people born with that nature. It has nothing to do with a weak-willed father and overbearing mother, or improper toilet training, or anything but heredity.

 

[CornusKousa]

They're only "left" because the right won't support their rights. Nothing about homosexuality naturally inclines one to be a socialist or something.

Putting a federal gun to everyone's head to celebrate their sexual activities, which is fucking weird in the first place, has nothing to do with rights.

Right, and the way you characterize them at the end of that sentence has nothing to do with it. Gotcha.

Gets the authoritarians foaming at the mouth.....got you.

No, I think it shows your true colors.
Sad truth is, with most groups that overwhelmingly support Democrats, it's not so much because it's a perfect match as it is because the Republicans are a bunch of reactionary bigots.

Nope...that's the narrative, that's the lie.

It's about conformity and tribalism.

Agreed. But "normalcy" isn't objective, and you're confused as to which party has "an appreciation for science".

For some it is, and no he's not, especially biology....tell us more about how trans women are women.

Right....biology is something the social constructionist left regularly rejects and considerers "racist" and "transphobic"...because biological facts don't support their political insanity.

Science tells us homosexuality is normalcy for people born with that nature. It has nothing to do with a weak-willed father and overbearing mother, or improper toilet training, or anything but heredity.

No gay gene...sorry peck, there is no science to support your fantasy here.

 

[WillJ8787]

Yet the LGBTQ follow the radical Commie left. They know the force of totalitarianism is the only tool left to open the doors of the national closet and make people and their children recognize and accept the aberration and weirdness of their existence.

100% backwards and Wrong....but close

 

[jomar]

You ok, RR? Sounds like a reaction formation against your latent homosexuality?

 

[RobDownSouth]

Right....biology is something the social constructionist left regularly rejects and considerers "racist" and "transphobic"...because biological facts don't support their political insanity.

All that education, and Stanford Von Mischling still can't comprehend the concept that sex and gender are two entirely different things.

People often use the terms “sex” and “gender” interchangeably, but this is incorrect. Sex and gender are different, and it is crucial to understand why.

“Sex” refers to the physical differences between people who are male, female, or intersex. A person typically has their sex assigned at birth based on physiological characteristics, including their genitalia and chromosome composition. This assigned sex is called a person’s “natal sex.”

Gender, on the other hand, involves how a person identifies. Unlike natal sex, gender is not made up of binary forms. Instead, gender is a broad spectrum. A person may identify at any point within this spectrum or outside of it entirely.

Link

No gay gene...sorry peck, there is no science to support your fantasy here.

No such thing as an incel gene either, yet here you are.

 

[CornusKousa]

All that education, and Stanford Von Mischling still can't comprehend the concept that sex and gender are two entirely different things.

Link

1) No, they aren't.

They are deeply intertwined, so much so that's why outside of some leftist social constructionism (aka buuu shit) it's been very difficult to draw a definitive line in the sand as to the difference.

2) still doesn't make a trans woman a woman.

3) https://i.imgur.com/Q2Rob0v.jpg

No such thing as an incel gene either, yet here you are.

I'm not an incel either...shit I just put another baby in the superJew.

Stay mad about it...racist old white guy