Dumb-fuck MyPillow CEO (many say it's a shit product BTW) banned from Twitter

[SgtSpiderMan]

The definition which supports my position fully.



How so??

It's nothing of the sort LOL and why the argument hasn't failed at all.

It still doesn't, which is why you have nothing to do but stomp your feet. You again ran from a direct question, who is being suppressed?

 

[oggbashan]

How??

Because you want to control how a private company behaves. That is left, not right,

Own it - leftist control freak!

 

[WillJ8787]

Because you want to control how a private company behaves. That is left, not right,

Own it - leftist control freak!

Yep, because Control(regulation) which can only come via Govt is what your describing and that isn't what you Righttards have ever been for...your advocating what we.progressive embrace.

Reasonable regulations on:
Big business

And along with that...

Reasonable Gun control
Social justice
Racial justice

Hey, welcome aboard Corncobb...your now a liberal and a progressive.

 

[CornusKousa]

It still doesn't,

You need to learn how to read.

which is why you have nothing to do but stomp your feet.

And cite academic references that back me up...something you can't do, but sure

You again ran from a direct question, who is being suppressed?

The people being banned/deplatformed.

 

[CornusKousa]

Because you want to control how a private company behaves. That is left, not right,

Own it - leftist control freak!

No, I don't, you're making shit up and can't support this claim with anything.

 

[RoryN]

We call this "triggered as f*ck":

Who Posted?

CornusKousa 31
phrodeau 13
icanhelp1 11

Further proof that America's Proud Boy contingent has collectively lost their shit since their twice-impeached daddy was exiled to Florida.

 

[CornusKousa]

We call this "triggered as f*ck":

Who Posted?

CornusKousa 31
phrodeau 13
icanhelp1 11

Further proof that America's Proud Boy contingent has collectively lost their shit since their twice-impeached daddy was exiled to Florida.

Rory thinks I'm a proud boy?

LOL...that's cute, your fantasies say more about you than they'll ever say about me.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

It's you who doesn't understand the word.

You are not being "censored" if you are booted off a site for breaking the contract you agreed to.

"Censorship" would be if they published your post for all to see, but put a black box over all of it, as in:

https://th.bing.com/th/id/Rf45a45f400ffd5abc5175c1060e1428b?rik=u%2bRtqcS%2bK8dPzA&riu=http%3a%2f%2fimg.cinemablend.com%2fcb%2f5%2f3%2f7%2f6%2fe%2fd%2f5376ed0d10e0e95d6100c62f0d9d5bd927eddf32e46d14ac4bf2da499fe4a53a.jpg&ehk=pl1MhL3mIc02HPjYNdioGPyNnYlV0yZD7jn73882qDw%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

That is a censored document.

Kicking you off the site is not censorship.

You REALLY ought to go read the definition of that word, there are no qualifiers on it. You can self censor....no TOS required.

It's still censorship, generally accepted censorship, but still censorship.

The fact they let leftist violate the "contract" which is applied vaguely and along political lines further undermines this last ditch flailing effort to put a "TOS" qualifier on the term censorship when there is none.

Just for the record, I am again 100% for these private companies right to censor their platforms.

 

[CornusKousa]

It's you who doesn't understand the word.

You are not being "censored" if you are booted off a site for breaking the contract you agreed to.

Yes, you are.

Again, you can even self censor...your flailing attempt to put qualifications around the term failed the first few times you tried and it's still a fail.

"Censorship" would be if they published your post for all to see, but put a black box over all of it, as in:

https://th.bing.com/th/id/Rf45a45f400ffd5abc5175c1060e1428b?rik=u%2bRtqcS%2bK8dPzA&riu=http%3a%2f%2fimg.cinemablend.com%2fcb%2f5%2f3%2f7%2f6%2fe%2fd%2f5376ed0d10e0e95d6100c62f0d9d5bd927eddf32e46d14ac4bf2da499fe4a53a.jpg&ehk=pl1MhL3mIc02HPjYNdioGPyNnYlV0yZD7jn73882qDw%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

That is a censored document.

Another false equivalency.

Yes, that is a form of censorship, just like all the other types of censorship you've pointed too.

Kicking you off the site is not censorship.

Banning people for wrong thing is in fact another example of censorship.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

No, you're not.

There's no "failure" simply because you say so lol

I've said the same thing in every post. Not flailing at all.

You agree to the contract, you break the contract, you are not being "censored" if you are booted.

So-called self-censorship has different "TOS." Presumably, you start out with the expectation you are allowed to say anything the hell you want. There's a presumption of total freedom you do not have when you've signed onto a site with RULES THAT YOU AGREED TO.

You can't "censor" something that has no standing to be there in the first place. it is ruled out from before it's even said.

Yes, you are.

Again, you can even self censor...your flailing attempt to put qualifications around the term failed the first few times you tried and it's still a fail.




Another false equivalency.

Yes, that is a form of censorship, just like all the other types of censorship you've pointed too.



Banning people for wrong thing is in fact another example of censorship.

 

[coati]

Banning people for wrong thing is in fact another example of censorship.

No, even if your "thing" no longer works, that would never be a reason for Laurel to ban you.

You were banned for promoting illegal violence in several different situations, which I've noticed you no longer do in explicit terms.

Good for you. No reason for you to be bitter about your thing not working, anyway.

 

[CornusKousa]

No, you're not.

There's no "failure" simply because you say so lol

No I already explained why it's a failure. Logical fallacies are fail.

I've said the same thing in every post. Not flailing at all.

You've tried the same dishonest fallacy, you've not said the same things, again with the dishonesty.

You agree to the contract, you break the contract, you are not being "censored" if you are booted.

So what, and yes you are, by definition.

So-called self-censorship has different "TOS." Presumably, you start out with the expectation you are allowed to say anything the hell you want. There's a presumption of total freedom you do not have when you've signed onto a site with RULES THAT YOU AGREED TO.

TOS are irrelevant...go find a definition of censorship that has a TOS clause on it. :

It's ok, we'll wait.

You can't "censor" something that has no standing to be there in the first place. it is ruled out from before it's even said.

Show me in the definition of censorship where it says anything about need a right to be there in the first place.....

It's ok we'll wait.

Sure you can, ruling it out in the first place is a form of censorship.

You REALLY ought to go read the definition of the word sometime.

 

[CornusKousa]

No, even if your "thing" no longer works, that would never be a reason for Laurel to ban you.

You were banned for promoting illegal violence in several different situations, which I've noticed you no longer do in explicit terms.

Good for you. No reason for you to be bitter about your thing not working, anyway.

Think...it was a typo.

And I never promoted illegal violence in the first place.

I still do as an effective means of stoping all sorts of fuckery. We should use the military to secure out borders and I still hope the abused of the world rise up and put their abusers in the ICU.

That's not illegal, it's offensive to leftist...NOT the same thing.

This is why I was banned for wrong think and no actual violation of the TOS.

Either way, censorship is still censorship.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Is Dumb-Dumb still claiming he was banned because Laurelle disagrees with his retarded political positions?

 

[CornusKousa]

Is Dumb-Dumb still claiming he was banned because Laurelle disagrees with his retarded political positions?

Why don't you stop being such a little BITCH, come out from hiding and find out??

Or don't and continue being the little shit talking bitch who can't back up a fuckin' thing he says.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

MRW I run into an internet tough guy

https://i.gifer.com/origin/2f/2f4fc0deddc0bbee93230a2838e31cec.gif


https://i.imgur.com/aaeTp6S.gif


https://i.imgflip.com/12aisq.jpg





Poor lil Dumb-Dumb.

 

[CornusKousa]

https://i.gifer.com/origin/2f/2f4fc0deddc0bbee93230a2838e31cec.gif


https://i.imgur.com/aaeTp6S.gif


https://i.imgflip.com/12aisq.jpg





Poor lil Dumb-Dumb.

OH look the little bitch ain't hiding anymore.......how cute.

Did you answer your own dumbass questions yet Luk or do you still need your comrades to spoon feed them to you??

Still can't back up any of the idiocy you spout....we know why

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You need to learn how to read.



And cite academic references that back me up...something you can't do, but sure



The people being banned/deplatformed.

No one can cite academic references to back you up because you post insanity.

No, they have not been suppressed. The My Pillow Guy was on Fox talking about this, no one suppressed him from being on Fox.

Your argument is that if someone painted something on your house that you didn't want there that you, as owner of the house, can't paint over it without it being censorship.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

Poor lil Dumb-Dumb breaks the rules immediately after my post about the reason behind his bannings.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Why don't you stop being such a little BITCH, come out from hiding and find out??

Or don't and continue being the little shit talking bitch who can't back up a fuckin' thing he says.

What would he find out?

 

[CornusKousa]

No one can cite academic references to back you up because you post insanity.

Already done, you're ignoring the definition of censorship won't change the fact that it supports me.

No, they have not been suppressed.

Yes, they have, from whatever platform they were banned from.

The My Pillow Guy was on Fox talking about this, no one suppressed him from being on Fox.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/ConcernedPrestigiousLacewing-small.gif

Fox isn't the platform accused of censorship though is it??

Your argument is that if someone painted something on your house that you didn't want there that you, as owner of the house can't paint over it without it being censorship.

Or if they're talking too much shit you can throw them out too....hell if they get belligerent you can kill that mother fucker 100% legally.

Privilege of private property, you get to censor it largely however you want, which I 100% support.

It's Still censorship....justified in your opinion or under the law or by whatever standard you like....many different forms of censorship have been laid out in this thread.

 

[CornusKousa]

What would he find out?

The answer to his question.....

Is Dumb-Dumb still claiming he was banned because Laurelle disagrees with his retarded political positions?

Attention to details.

 

[LukSkyFokker]

What would he find out?

That he's even a bigger shit-talking pussy than on the interwebz.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Already done, you're ignoring the definition of censorship won't change the fact that it supports me.



Yes, they have, from whatever platform they were banned from.



Fox isn't the platform accused of censorship though is it??



Or if they're talking too much shit you can throw them out too....hell if they get belligerent you can kill that mother fucker 100% legally.

Privilege of private property, you get to censor it largely however you want, which I 100% support.

It's Still censorship....justified in your opinion or under the law or by whatever standard you like....many different forms of censorship have been laid out in this thread.

What a surprise, BotanyBoy comes back with a goal post move, suddenly there are lots of forms of censorship, which you get to make up the definitions for as you go along. As you just stated, you're trying to make your opinion an official definition.

You haven't posted any academic references which back you up. You're just trying to make up your own definitions.

No, they haven't been suppressed. They can still participate in the activity of saying what they want, as demonstrated on Fox, so not at all a goal post move.

Great, post the address to your house. I'd like to organize a BLM rally there. If you don't provide it, you're censoring people.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

The answer to his question.....




Attention to details.

What's the answer? What would he actually find out?
I'm sure you're not afraid to provide a straightforward answer.