Dumb-fuck MyPillow CEO (many say it's a shit product BTW) banned from Twitter

[CornusKousa]

More lies from BotanyBoy who has been documented lying in each of his posts.

More lies from SgtSpiderMan he'll never support.

It’s up to you to show that people have lost the right to free speech or are being censored. You can’t because they aren’t.

Why is it up to me to prove your ascription about a claim I never made??

This is bullshit deflection because you got called on your lie and now you can't back it up.



Your lies sir....

He hates America, free speech, & other freedoms America gives us.

Can you support them^^ or not??



Wriggle wriggle wriggle!!!

 

[WillJ8787]

You're conflating legally protected speech and 1st amendment civil rights, with free speech.

Not the same things.

I 100% support private companies right to refuse service to anyone for any reason...regardless of whatever asshole reasoning. If Twitter wants to turn their product into the puritanical echo chamber of woke? That's their bidnizz. I don't care.

Doesn't change the fact that they are censoring their product and censorship is anti-free speech.[/QUOTE]

By this definition, every product or service is censored and anti- free speech....which makes it a statement of mumbo jumbo nonsense.

 

[CornusKousa]

By this definition, every product or service is censored and anti- free speech....which makes it a statement of mumbo jumbo nonsense.

Not every, just every big popular brand. "Product" in this case being social media sites/platforms.

Facebate, youtube and Twitter are giants no doubt but there are plenty of smaller places you can go where you'll not be banned for having opinions and ideas outside of the "progressive" ideal.....despite the tech oligarchs and DNC's best efforts to stamp them out.

 

[WillJ8787]

Chuckles....the force doesn't exist in this one

 

[CornusKousa]

Chuckles....the force doesn't exist in this one

Apology accepted.

 

[coati]

There is nothing in the Constitutional obligating Twitter to provide a platform for individuals who support insurrection and attacks against the mainstream media's right to free speech. The owner of MyPillow wanted Trump to take over the nation with martial law following certification of Trump's loss in the Presidential election.

Banning autocrats from social media platforms following an unsuccessful insurrection attempt is vital to maintaining free speech in the U.S. Most of Lit's deplorables still have not figured out that autocracy and free speech are incompatible.

For those who still cling to their North Korean model, over here we use free speech to get elected in a voting process. Then we accept the results of the election after all court appeals and certifications have been completed. I know this concept is hard for you to understand. If you can't grasp it, consider returning to North Korea.

 

[Lazaran]

There is nothing in the Constitutional obligating Twitter to provide a platform for individuals who support insurrection and attacks against the mainstream media's right to free speech. The owner of MyPillow wanted Trump to take over the nation with martial law following certification of Trump's loss in the Presidential election.

Banning autocrats from social media platforms following an unsuccessful insurrection attempt is vital to maintaining free speech in the U.S. Most of Lit's deplorables still have not figured out that autocracy and free speech are incompatible.

For those who still cling to their North Korean model, over here we use free speech to get elected in a voting process. Then we accept the results of the election after all court appeals and certifications have been completed. I know this concept is hard for you to understand. If you can't grasp it, consider returning to North Korea.

Creeping Charlie is trying to salvage a small win out of its epic fail, by playing at the ridiculous notion that it ONLY cared about the assault on the PRINCIPLE of free speech, and not about claims by "conservatives" that their first amendment rights are being violated by private social media platforms.

The irritating weed's pathetic attempt at diverting from the original grievance it was championing is SO obvious.

Potted plants are really dumb.

 

[CornusKousa]

Really? You support private companies that refuse service to anyone? Does that include refusing service to minorities and members of the lgbtqpa+ community?
Asking for a friend.
Actually in retrospect this doesn't surprise me. I believe you do.

I don't support the companies who do, I support their right to do.

Kinda like free speech, I don't agree with or support everything everyone says...I do support their right to say/express it though....no matter how objectionable I or anyone else finds it.

There is nothing in the Constitutional obligating Twitter to provide a platform for individuals who support insurrection and attacks against the mainstream media's right to free speech. The owner of MyPillow wanted Trump to take over the nation with martial law following certification of Trump's loss in the Presidential election.

Banning autocrats from social media platforms following an unsuccessful insurrection attempt is vital to maintaining free speech in the U.S. Most of Lit's deplorables still have not figured out that autocracy and free speech are incompatible.

For those who still cling to their North Korean model, over here we use free speech to get elected in a voting process. Then we accept the results of the election after all court appeals and certifications have been completed. I know this concept is hard for you to understand. If you can't grasp it, consider returning to North Korea.

LOL another authoritarian leftist claiming censorship is necessary to protect free speech.

"We had to destroy the village to save it." LMFAO!!

Still hasn't looked up the term autocracy either.

Creeping Charlie is trying to salvage a small win out of its epic fail, by playing at the ridiculous notion that it ONLY cared about the assault on the PRINCIPLE of free speech, and not about claims by "conservatives" that their first amendment rights are being violated by private social media platforms.

The irritating weed's pathetic attempt at diverting from the original grievance it was championing is SO obvious.

Potted plants are really dumb.

And there is the dishonesty that you can always count on in a Lazaran post.

Other than a few nuts, I don't think any conservatives are claiming that.

I see that coming out of progressive leftist 1,000 times more often than anyone to the right of Mao....usually in defense of censorship, on a double standard of course (it's ok when they do it)

 

[Lazaran]

.
Creeping Charlie is clearly flustered and it's getting its vines crossed and tangled.

The irritating weed has been reduced to flailing its tendrils around impotently. It's hilarious to watch.

Potted plants are really dumb.

 

[icanhelp1]

Private companies have a Constitution right to decide what they will allow or not...their is no right to free speech from the product or service receipient...

... especially when they pay NOTHING to use the product/service.

It’s still corporate censorship.

 

[CornusKousa]

.
Creeping Charlie is clearly flustered and it's getting its vines crossed and tangled.

The irritating weed has been reduced to flailing its tendrils around impotently. It's hilarious to watch.

Potted plants are really dumb.

Projection from the guy who can't back up his lies.

 

[icanhelp1]

There is nothing in the Constitutional obligating Twitter to provide a platform for individuals who support insurrection and attacks against the mainstream media's right to free speech. The owner of MyPillow wanted Trump to take over the nation with martial law following certification of Trump's loss in the Presidential election.

Banning autocrats from social media platforms following an unsuccessful insurrection attempt is vital to maintaining free speech in the U.S. Most of Lit's deplorables still have not figured out that autocracy and free speech are incompatible.

For those who still cling to their North Korean model, over here we use free speech to get elected in a voting process. Then we accept the results of the election after all court appeals and certifications have been completed. I know this concept is hard for you to understand. If you can't grasp it, consider returning to North Korea.

Oppose different opinions by arguing your side, more free speech not less.

Don’t see much condemnation of riots on the left coast. When (D)s support insurrection it’s OK Oh! I get it.

 

[CornusKousa]

Oppose different opinions by arguing your side, more free speech not less.

Don’t see much condemnation of riots on the left coast. When (D)s support insurrection it’s OK Oh! I get it.

That's because when THEY do it, it's not violence, rioting and insurrection to kill people, the police and burn court houses and the community at large....that is "mostly peaceful protesting".

 

[Lazaran]

.
There's nothing more pathetic than a desperate right wing snowflake.

Creating straw man arguments and ascribing support for riots and insurrection to others after the ACTUAL insurrection and attempted coup at the Capitol instigated by the Orange fascist they openly support is pathetic.

People that loot and riot in response to a perceived social injustice should be condemned, and if convicted, punished to the fullest extent of the law for the crimes they commit. Including capital punishment if a murder is committed and state law provides for it.

People who attempt ACTUAL violent unjustified and unlawful insurrection should be condemned, tried for treason, and subjected to capital punishment. Full stop. Especially considering the murder of a Capitol police officer. We shall see if those traitors will be held fully accountable for their seditious, murderous acts.

 

[icanhelp1]

That's because when THEY do it, it's not violence, rioting and insurrection to kill people, the police and burn court houses and the community at large....that is "mostly peaceful protesting".

OH! I did not know this! LMFAO

 

[phrodeau]

Oppose different opinions by arguing your side, more free speech not less.

Don’t see much condemnation of riots on the left coast. When (D)s support insurrection it’s OK Oh! I get it.

I’ve seen lots of condemnation of rioters.

It helps if you research a topic before posting.

 

[phrodeau]

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-news-maria-maria-bartiromo-b1793418.html?amp

Josh Hawley claims he is being silenced – in interview with Fox News broadcast to millions

Josh Hawley ridiculed for claiming he is being silenced while on country’s most-watched cable news channel

‘Can someone please unmuzzle the guy who appears on my TV every 30 minutes?’

 

[icanhelp1]

I’ve seen lots of condemnation of rioters.

It helps if you research a topic before posting.

Every republican politician condemned the capital cabal, haven’t seen one Democrat condemn ANTIFA other than the mayor of Portland and that’s because they threatened him.

 

[phrodeau]

Every republican politician condemned the capital cabal, haven’t seen one Democrat condemn ANTIFA other than the mayor of Portland and that’s because they threatened him.

You didn’t hear about this?

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/politics/joe-biden-pittsburgh-violence-speech/index.html

Or this?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-condemns-antifa-violent-protests

Didn’t you even watch the debates?

https://www.kgw.com/amp/article/new...iden/283-22fe041b-dde6-45c6-8209-ca2952515bc9

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Every republican politician condemned the capital cabal, haven’t seen one Democrat condemn ANTIFA other than the mayor of Portland and that’s because they threatened him.

Would you just shut the fuck up with your "what about isms".

You can tolerate one, just because of the other???? That does not make any sense.

So understand, riots in Portland bad, attempting to over throw the seat of government bad.

Can you not understand that?

Last here is Biden condemning it back in August, so that makes at least two democrats condemning it, and I can understand why you would not see any news of Democrats condemning it. Because your news comes from rightwing sources with dubious reputations for reporting falsehoods.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/30/biden-condemns-portland-violence-goes-after-trump.html

 

[icanhelp1]

You didn’t hear about this?

https://www.cnn.com/2020/08/31/politics/joe-biden-pittsburgh-violence-speech/index.html

Or this?

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-condemns-antifa-violent-protests

Didn’t you even watch the debates?

https://www.kgw.com/amp/article/new...iden/283-22fe041b-dde6-45c6-8209-ca2952515bc9

He did not call out ANTIFA

 

[icanhelp1]

Would you just shut the fuck up with your "what about isms".

You can tolerate one, just because of the other???? That does not make any sense.

So understand, riots in Portland bad, attempting to over throw the seat of government bad.

Can you not understand that?

Last here is Biden condemning it back in August, so that makes at least two democrats condemning it, and I can understand why you would not see any news of Democrats condemning it. Because your news comes from rightwing sources with dubious reputations for reporting falsehoods.

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/30/biden-condemns-portland-violence-goes-after-trump.html

He condemned violence because his poll numbers were dropping but he never condemned ANTIFA, the source.

Republicans condemned both ANTIFA and right wing extremists at the capital. That’s the point dumb ass. If you can’t connect with the spirit of an argument then stay the fuck out of shit you can’t comprehend.

 

[phrodeau]

He did not call out ANTIFA

Why should he? Peaceful protest is a Constitutional right.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

He condemned violence because his poll numbers were dropping but he never condemned ANTIFA, the source.

Who's the head of ANTIFA? Since it's apparently a full-fledged organization by the way you're making them out to be.

Did the Republicans call their leader out by name, or...?

 

[phrodeau]

Trump: “The United States of America will be designating ANTIFA as a Terrorist Organization.”

It never happened.