butters
High on a Hill
- Joined
 - Jul 2, 2009
 
- Posts
 - 85,960
 
he's living in the twilight zone!.
Domncoast is obviously dumber than a box of uneducated rocks.
SAD!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
he's living in the twilight zone!.
Domncoast is obviously dumber than a box of uneducated rocks.
SAD!!!
He has total faith in Rudy “the tool” Giuliani
Yup! Everyone tucks in their shirt that way ... with a Russian in the room
Puppet!!
Putin either has his hand up Rudy’s ass or he is taking money
And
We know he takes money!!
gosh, you're so smart you think you can try reading the rules about good practise re quote lengths (max 5 paragraphs as a norm) and linking to your source matter?Posted by Michael Goodwin, a registered democrat:
Vote for America.
mikee332 is offline Report Post
Tucker Carlson Says He Had 'Authentic, Damning' New Hunter Biden Documents—But They Got Lost in the Mail
Tucker Carlson on Wednesday night claimed that he was in possession of a collection of new, confidential and damning documents related to Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden's family but isn't anymore because it got lost in the mail.
In a short Tucker Carlson Tonight segment, the Fox News host told a personal story about how he had received "real, authentic and damning" Hunter Biden documents, before suspiciously losing it in the mail.
https://www.newsweek.com/tucker-car...nter-biden-documents-it-got-lost-mail-1543084
Tucker's authentic, damning documents got lost in the mail?
This sounds suspiciously like the intellectually lazy kids in grade school who tell the teacher that the dog at their homework!
When We Talk About Fox News, We Need to Talk About the Murdoch Family Too
The Murdochs own Fox News but rarely get the scrutiny they deserve for bankrolling racism and hatred.
HERE’S A TRICK question about the controversy over Hunter Biden’s laptop: Who’s most to blame for giving this pseudo-scandal more attention than it deserves? The New York Post for publishing the first sketchy article, or Fox News for elevating it in broadcast after broadcast?
The answer is neither. The guiltiest party is the Murdoch family, which owns both outlets. Fox and the Post are key parts of a media empire assembled over the decades by 89-year-old Rupert Murdoch, who now shares ownership with his six children, one of whom is chief executive of the family’s main company, Fox Corporation. While the Post doesn’t register much with readers outside New York, Fox is of course a national brand with a gusher of profits that has helped turn each of the Murdochs into multibillionaires. Given that Fox is a “central node” of the far-right conspiracy machine, it’s fair to regard the Murdochs as America’s first family of disinformation.
The Murdochs, however, attract far less attention than their hired hands, the journalists and shouting heads who have downplayed Covid-19 and created the delusional content that helped catapult Donald Trump to the White House. The New York Times, in the approximately dozen stories it has published that touch on the Biden laptop controversy, referenced the Murdochs in just two of them, in passing. At the Washington Post, only three articles about the laptop mention the Murdochs — again, in passing.
There’s no shortage of reporting about the wretched content created by the Murdoch machine, but remarkably little reporting about the fact that the Murdochs are behind it. As MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes noted on Twitter after the first laptop story came out, “If you’re just choosing from people in OECD countries, ostensible liberal democracies, Rupert Murdoch has to be up there as the most-single-handedly destructive person of the last three decades, right?” But Hayes can be part of the problem. While he often criticizes Fox, and on rare occasions discusses the Murdochs, most of the time he fails to mention the family that could literally flip a switch and shut off the poison. On April 20, Hayes broadcast an eight-minute segment about Fox encouraging protests against stay-at-home orders, and a week later he devoted seven minutes to detailing the ways in which Fox downplayed Covid-19 — but while he named hosts and guests who spread the worst disinformation, “Murdoch” never passed his lips.
https://theintercept.com/2020/10/24/fox-news-murdoch-family-media/
Tucker's authentic, damning documents got lost in the mail?
This sounds suspiciously like the intellectually lazy kids in grade school who tell the teacher that the dog at their homework!
.
Domncoast is obviously dumber than a box of uneducated rocks.
SAD!!!
Just recently a group of armed Trump supporters stalked a campaign bus that was in Texas to promote Joseph Biden’s candidacy. They used pickup trucks to box in the campaign bus and tried to force it off the road. They also rammed an SUV that was traveling with the campaign bus.
Such reckless violence could have gotten somebody killed...indeed that may have been their intention, but over at Fox "news", Jeanine Pirro described the incident as "ordinary Americans taking this election into their own hands and getting out there and being real clear on what they stand for."
Seriously?
And they call this a news channel?
No more proof of being a partisan shill than the obligatory attack on FOX News. Just change the channel and mind your own business; we're all adults and can make up our own damned minds as to where we consume news/entertainment.
The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]
The site has been used by researchers at the University of Michigan to create a tool called the "Iffy Quotient", which draws data from Media Bias/Fact Check and NewsWhip to track the prevalence of "fake news" and questionable sources on social media.[6][7] The site was also used by a research group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in initial training of an AI to fact check and detect the bias on a website.[8][9]
Wiki
The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]
Can anyone be trusted any more?