So this is quite disturbing

[HornyProf]

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/04/...l?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage

As you might expect given that I am posting here, I have always been a proponent of liberal hippy pro sex ethics, and it is easy to see why someone would think the child exploitation Kristoff describes is in part the result of such sexual liberation (old term!) I am inclined to think the opposite, that our (Thinking of US here) society is paradoxically both too liberal sexually and too puritanical. sexy outfits are marketed to 12 year old girls, but having sex in a public park at midnight can land you in jail (i think--my own experience just included a warning) Our most puritanical states also have the largest percentage of teen pregnancy--the same states that mandate that sex education should be "abstinence only" Repressed sexual desire often leads to perverted sexual desire (pervert: ethically wrong, not =kinky) I think sexual exploitation and prudery are at least in part two sides of the same coin. What do you think?

 

[astuffedshirt_perv]

As you might expect given that I am posting here...

For those of you who can't (paywall) or won't click the link, the author points out that there is truly awful stuff posted on Pornhub (gasp!). Underage, unconscious, unknowing victims. Amusingly, the author is careful to let the reader know exactly what search terms to use to find said videos. In the conclusion, he concedes there is no fix, but maybe 1) more moderators, 2) no downloads and 3) verified posters. Could help with the problem.

 

[jaF0]

What do you think?

I think you should try your post again, maybe in English next time. And I think you should know Lit's rules about not discussing certain things.

 

[EmptyTank]

NAMBLA
It's out there.
The only state that it's associated with is state of mind.