..President Trump, will spend the transition period 'breaking stuff' with 'vengeance'

[Comshaw]

This is what I'm worried about. Put a petulant child in charge of very important things, tell them "NO" and what happens? They throw a fit and destroy things. The donald has never been told "NO", he's never lost because as his niece says, he thinks no matter how you win, if you win is the only thing worth consideration. He's cheated, stolen, intimidated and bullied his way thorugh life. And now he has the reins of the country, the power to do much and the sullen, whiny temperment to carry out his revenge. He could do a lot of harm (much more than he already has) to the country between now and January 20th.

Yea, I"m worried.

Mary Trump says her uncle, President Trump, will spend the transition period 'breaking stuff' with 'vengeance'

Comshaw

 

[Bud_Spencer]

You mean like he'll gin up a phony Russian collusion myth, orchestrated by deep state operatives in the intelligence agencies and relying on a bogus dossier bought an paid for by the rival party? Who would do such a thing?

 

[Lazaran]

^
Is co-signing Trump's vindictive loser temper tantrum carnage spree based on the lie that Trump and his campaign didn't collude with Russia.

SAD!!!

 

[Bud_Spencer]

^
Is co-signing Trump's vindictive loser temper tantrum carnage spree based on the lie that Trump and his campaign didn't collide with Russia.

SAD!!!

It's so interesting. Back in the days of the Church Commission, Democrats were apoplectic that the CIA was out there overthrowing foreign governments, yet now that they're overthrowing our own, Dems are cool with it.

 

[Lazaran]

^
Thinks Democrats should be apoplectic about something that didn't happen.

SAD!!!

 

[KeithD]

The up side to his obsession with fighting the reality of his loss of job is that it's time not spent tearing up the room on his way out.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

^
Thinks Democrats should be apoplectic about something that didn't happen.

SAD!!!

It did, and there have been a number of books written on it already. I'm sure Durham's report, if it's not spiked by Dementia Joe's new AG, will spell out the whole tawdry banana-republicanization of our government at the hands of the DNC.

 

[Comshaw]

It's so interesting. Back in the days of the Church Commission, Democrats were apoplectic that the CIA was out there overthrowing foreign governments, yet now that they're overthrowing our own, Dems are cool with it.

And you have proof of this do you? Real, honest, concrete proof? I am so fucking tired of allegations, innuendos and opinions being offered as proof. Pony up the proof or STFU. Ten dollars against a hole in a doughnut you will either offer just what I listed, don't have shit or you're gunna pull the old Ishy "I ain't doing your research for you" dodge.

3...2...1...

Comshaw

 

[oggbashan]

I just hope some country like Iran doesn't piss off President Trump before January. He still has the nuclear codes...

 

[KeithD]

It's been Trump working on overthrowing the American government. The American government is more than the administration. We're just in another phase of an attempted internal palace coup scenario.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

And you have proof of this do you? Real, honest, concrete proof? I am so fucking tired of allegations, innuendos and opinions being offered as proof. Pony up the proof or STFU. Ten dollars against a hole in a doughnut you will either offer just what I listed, don't have shit or you're gunna pull the old Ishy "I ain't doing your research for you" dodge.

3...2...1...

Comshaw

AG Barr himself has stated, definitively, that the Trump campaign was spied on. Actual real-life spies. And that doesn't even get into the FISA abuse that allowed the deep state to access Trump's campaign communications. Jim Comey agreed with Barr, though he preferred to call the spies "confidential informants."

Down to the banana republic...

 

[Comshaw]

And you have proof of this do you? Real, honest, concrete proof? I am so fucking tired of allegations, innuendos and opinions being offered as proof. Pony up the proof or STFU. Ten dollars against a hole in a doughnut you will either offer just what I listed, don't have shit or you're gunna pull the old Ishy "I ain't doing your research for you" dodge.

3...2...1...

Comshaw

AG Barr himself has stated, definitively, that the Trump campaign was spied on. Actual real-life spies. And that doesn't even get into the FISA abuse that allowed the deep state to access Trump's campaign communications. Jim Comey agreed with Barr, though he preferred to call the spies "confidential informants."

Down to the banana republic...

Did I call it or did I call it? I love me some doughnut holes.

Comshaw

 

[Adre]

I just hope some country like Iran doesn't piss off President Trump before January. He still has the nuclear codes...

That order would not be obeyed.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

It's been Trump working on overthrowing the American government. The American government is more than the administration. We're just in another phase of an attempted internal palace coup scenario.

Insane. But what else is the Left but disconnected from reality?

 

[Bud_Spencer]

Did I call it or did I call it? I love me some doughnut holes.

Comshaw

I could link you to books and articles, but you won't read them, so why do it? You'll remain in your epistemic bubble regardless. the pinprick is coming.

 

[Lazaran]

Did I call it or did I call it? I love me some doughnut holes.

Comshaw

I'm sure Pud_Spanker felt his argument was very convincing.

SAD!!!

 

[Bud_Spencer]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/12/10/ag_barr_president_trumps_2016_campaign_was_clearly_spied_on.html

Campaign spied on

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2020/09/30/comey-admits-knowing-what-i-know-now-i-wouldnt-sign-a-fisa-warrant-against-carter-page-n2577212

Carter page spied on, unjustly. He was a campaign FP advisor

Watergate was child's play next to this.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

https://www.amazon.com/Ball-Collusion-Election-Destroy-Presidency/dp/1641771224/ref=sr_1_1?crid=226YO1MX9T2LP&dchild=1&keywords=andrew+c+mccarthy&qid=1604868368&sprefix=andrew+c+m%2Caps%2C181&sr=8-1

all of Collusion: The Plot to Rig an Election and Destroy a Presidency

 

[icanhelp1]

AG Barr himself has stated, definitively, that the Trump campaign was spied on. Actual real-life spies. And that doesn't even get into the FISA abuse that allowed the deep state to access Trump's campaign communications. Jim Comey agreed with Barr, though he preferred to call the spies "confidential informants."

Down to the banana republic...

There are several statutory violations committed by the Clinton organization. One blatant statutory violation is obstruction of Justice, deleting 33,00 subpoenaed emails, another is violating 18 US code 1924; the inappropriate handling and storage of sensitive, classified material ** RUNNING THE STATE DEPT ON AN UNSECURED SERVER** is OK if you're Hillary. The left is under the opinion that if a corrupt DOJ fails to prosecute that that in itself equates to being innocent. Defrauding the FISC and spying on a campaign is appropriate if it's done by the DNC. These lefty looney toons lack any semblance of self awareness whatsoever or adherence to our laws. You're innocent if you're connected, and trust me Biden is connected, wouldn't be surprised if Eric Holder is courted for a second shot at AG.

 

[Bud_Spencer]

I just hope some country like Iran doesn't piss off President Trump before January. He still has the nuclear codes...

Pathethic wanker, Trump is the only President in decades not to involve us in a war. He constantly railed against stupid wars. Denentia Joe will have us in one, don't you doubt it.

 

[Comshaw]

And you have proof of this do you? Real, honest, concrete proof? I am so fucking tired of allegations, innuendos and opinions being offered as proof. Pony up the proof or STFU. Ten dollars against a hole in a doughnut you will either offer just what I listed, don't have shit or you're gunna pull the old Ishy "I ain't doing your research for you" dodge.

3...2...1...

Comshaw

I could link you to books and articles, but you won't read them, so why do it? You'll remain in your epistemic bubble regardless. the pinprick is coming.

Using a derivative of the Ish dodge as I predicted. Like I said, I love me some doughnut holes.

And if you do link me, these will be books and articles citing facts, facts that I can track and verify, not just some talking head's opinion of what the situation is, right? If you can do that, do it. I'll read it and IF it has verifiable facts to back it admit you are right. Let's see it.


Comshaw