Voter Fraud Does Exist, According To The Fraudster

[Rightguide]

Attention Adre

This guy needs to talk to the FBI, the Congress, and the President:


Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots

By Jon Levine

A top Democratic operative says voter fraud, especially with mail-in ballots, is no myth. And he knows this because he’s been doing it, on a grand scale, for decades.

Mail-in ballots have become the latest flashpoint in the 2020 elections. While President Trump and the GOP warn of widespread manipulation of the absentee vote that will swell with COVID polling restrictions, many Democrats and their media allies have dismissed such concerns as unfounded.

But the political insider, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he fears prosecution, said fraud is more the rule than the exception. His dirty work has taken him through the weeds of municipal and federal elections in Paterson, Atlantic City, Camden, Newark, Hoboken and Hudson County and his fingerprints can be found in local legislative, mayoral and congressional races across the Garden State. Some of the biggest names and highest office holders in New Jersey have benefited from his tricks, according to campaign records The Post reviewed.

“An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a difference,” the tipster said. “It could be enough to flip states.”

https://nypost.com/2020/08/29/political-insider-explains-voter-fraud-with-mail-in-ballots/

 

[FGB]

"AAAAchhhhOOOO!"

 

[Conager]

There's another article out there about Comma-Law's election to DA. She was significantly behind in polling going into the election, lost by significant margins on election night from in-person voting and eventually 'won' by less than 1% on hotly contested, harvested, mail-in ballots just like what is described above.

At that time, ballot harvesting was not legal. One-party rule California has since made ballot-hatvesting legal giving Democrats permission to steal.

 

[Rightguide]

There's another article out there about Comma-Law's election to DA. She was significantly behind in polling going into the election, lost by significant margins on election night from in-person voting and eventually 'won' by less than 1% on hotly contested, harvested, mail-in ballots just like what is described above.

At that time, ballot harvesting was not legal. One-party rule California has since made ballot-hatvesting legal giving Democrats permission to steal.

We have known for years this system was ripe for corruption. The left continues to deny it however. But here we are with a first hand account by a perpetrator himself.

 

[Conager]

First it was motor voter, then it was unlimited absentee ballot, then it was ballot harvesting and now they want to mess mail every ballot to every neighborhood and nursing home weather or not theirs any evidence that all that the voter is still eligible, still living (much less still lives there) or has any intention of voting.

As pointed out in your article, in-person fraud can occur, but it can't happen wholesale. You pretty much can pull that off once per precinct per operative. Ineligible persons are mostly going to self-select out of in-person voting. They have to meet someone's eye.

Who knows how many California ballots in 2016 were fraudulent or ineligible? Not that Hillary needed that score run up, but all of the various races had various crooks padding their score. Imagine a race between two Democrats as often happens in California. Dueling fraud with the top of the ticket Democrat getting the vote on both sets of suspect ballots.

That's what gets lost in people dismissing the idea of a grand conspiracy in a smoke filled back room. Democrats are always the ones wanting to foster an environment conducive to cheating because they know it is their voters, operatives, and candidates that ate more likely to exploit those opportunities. The party of situational ethics does not consider cheating to be unethical if it keeps an evil Republican or a less woke Democrat out of office.

 

[DeluxAuto]

We have known for years this system was ripe for corruption. The left continues to deny it however. But here we are with a first hand account by a perpetrator himself.

How many years does you think it goes back? To Reagan or Bush?

 

[FGB]

How many years does you think it goes back? To Reagan or Bush?

Probably the first election when it could go on.