AwkwardMD
Belzebutts
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2014
- Posts
- 2,400
Dancing Together, by SisterJezebel
Link
The beginning of Dancing Together was a problem for me. I talk a lot about scope, and sections not mattering, and I want to elaborate on that here.
You were right to point out that things come to a head at the party. That’s where things start to matter. The ~2000 words before that are there to establish that the protagonist loves her husband, and that they have history.
Now, I usually avoid rewriting sections of someone’s story to show how I would have done it, because how I would have done it is not something anyone else should be trying to replicate. I'm not that good, nor do I think that my way is 'right'. What I am trying to do is demonstrate how a distillation of the important information can be done.
There is a LOT of information in the beginning of the story, but what it boils down to is A) Molly loves her husband and, B) they’ve been married for a long time. Most readers can infer that from what I added.
Andreas’ shitty behavior, the other thing that happens in the first 2000 words, can simply be punted down the road a bit, and we really don’t need to see all the ways he is a shitty human being in order to accept characters acting uncomfortable around someone they perceive to be shitty. If you had, for example, shown Molly interacting with the receptionists or nurses, and then when Andreas comes over all the other women either roll their eyes or give him a sideways glance before leaving, that paints a picture.
My most recent story features a work place rife with harrassment (sexual and otherwise), but the worst offender never appears in the story. Instead, I wrote about the way his behavior impacted others, and the fallout on the office culture. You don't need to see a person run through the woods to be able to follow the footprints.
***
Andreas did not, to me, represent an appealing alternative to Stuart. The story definitely serves him on a plate, but it felt like I was being told he is option B rather than that I understood the attraction. He is arrogant and pigheaded, and at no time did I feel like Molly went for that kind of guy.
I don’t mean that to say that option B has to be a nice person in a story like this, just that option B should be in some way appealing to Molly. The story hinges on the “will she stray” tension, and even though the narration went to great pains to tell me about how Andreas continued to pay attention to/sexually harass Molly, I didn’t get the impression that his advances were all that welcome.
I think that it would not have taken much to explain that Molly, having only ever been with her husband, had started to worry that she regretted not listening to her mother when she was younger, and regretted not putting herself out there a bit more. Now she’s got this bad boy strutting around, and he’s got her weak kneed and fluttery even though she knows he’s not interested in her beyond the conquest. She hates how he makes her feel, but at the same time she can’t deny how he makes her feel, and she’s not equipped to hide those feels. She wishes she could have gotten guys like him out of her system when she was 16, without a marriage and kids hanging in the balance... or weighing her down. <gulp>
***
I think that the suitors in this story, husband vs coworker, made the lead-up to the choice more complicated. These two characters were, for the most part, never in the same place at the same time. They were never reacting to the same things in a way that we, the reader, could compare them. Instead, Molly bounced between them, and we had to experience them like different teams taking turns.
I also felt like you didn’t really go into the allure of straying. It is thrilling to have a secret, as well as to be ‘getting away with it’. When you know something other people don’t, that is power. Molly could have been privately getting off (literally or metaphorically) on her office flirtations. Loving it, and loving that it’s a secret. She’s in her 40’s, and she finally has a dirty little secret of her own! Even if she didn’t plan to stray, and even if Andreas was pushing for her to stray and Stuart worrying about her straying, all it would take is that one more straw for her to give in to her curiosity. That's the line you're trying to walk the reader right up to.
You did do a good job of showing Molly’s building frustration with Stuart. I've been married for 10 years myself. I understood her loneliness, and her frustrations, but I didn’t feel like she was at the kind of “any port in a storm” desperation that would have been required to make option B (Andreas) viable or sensible. Or appealing.
***
I was confused by the twist. I had to do a lot of re-reading up and down page 3, and then back to page 2, looking for a scene break I might have missed and now is Molly back at her house?... or maybe did Andreas have kids and I just didn’t know it? I don’t know that you could have done a better job revealing the twist you set up where you revealed it. I do think that perhaps revealing the twist before the sex might have been stronger. Doing that would have theoretically taken some of the edge out of the sex, but I was already out on Andreas. That affair, had it happened, would have had no… bite.
Had Molly gone through with it, I just would have thought less of Molly rather than empathizing with her conflicting desires.
Link
The beginning of Dancing Together was a problem for me. I talk a lot about scope, and sections not mattering, and I want to elaborate on that here.
You were right to point out that things come to a head at the party. That’s where things start to matter. The ~2000 words before that are there to establish that the protagonist loves her husband, and that they have history.
Now, I usually avoid rewriting sections of someone’s story to show how I would have done it, because how I would have done it is not something anyone else should be trying to replicate. I'm not that good, nor do I think that my way is 'right'. What I am trying to do is demonstrate how a distillation of the important information can be done.
Everything came to a head at my staff Christmas Party. The five doctors at the practice, myself as the nurse and the other part-time nurse and reception staff went to the Casino for dinner. It was a package where smaller workplaces could buy tables and instead of just having our party of around 20, there were over 100 people in the room giving it a very festive atmosphere. I arrived fashionably late with my husband. Between the stress of the job, the inevitable wear and tear of a twenty-one year marriage with three kids, and all the expectations that come with family (mine and his) around the holidays, I was dying for a night out. Dave, the managing partner, and his wife Margaret paid for everything including the drinks package, however, the drinks package did not include cocktails.
There is a LOT of information in the beginning of the story, but what it boils down to is A) Molly loves her husband and, B) they’ve been married for a long time. Most readers can infer that from what I added.
Andreas’ shitty behavior, the other thing that happens in the first 2000 words, can simply be punted down the road a bit, and we really don’t need to see all the ways he is a shitty human being in order to accept characters acting uncomfortable around someone they perceive to be shitty. If you had, for example, shown Molly interacting with the receptionists or nurses, and then when Andreas comes over all the other women either roll their eyes or give him a sideways glance before leaving, that paints a picture.
My most recent story features a work place rife with harrassment (sexual and otherwise), but the worst offender never appears in the story. Instead, I wrote about the way his behavior impacted others, and the fallout on the office culture. You don't need to see a person run through the woods to be able to follow the footprints.
***
Andreas did not, to me, represent an appealing alternative to Stuart. The story definitely serves him on a plate, but it felt like I was being told he is option B rather than that I understood the attraction. He is arrogant and pigheaded, and at no time did I feel like Molly went for that kind of guy.
I don’t mean that to say that option B has to be a nice person in a story like this, just that option B should be in some way appealing to Molly. The story hinges on the “will she stray” tension, and even though the narration went to great pains to tell me about how Andreas continued to pay attention to/sexually harass Molly, I didn’t get the impression that his advances were all that welcome.
I think that it would not have taken much to explain that Molly, having only ever been with her husband, had started to worry that she regretted not listening to her mother when she was younger, and regretted not putting herself out there a bit more. Now she’s got this bad boy strutting around, and he’s got her weak kneed and fluttery even though she knows he’s not interested in her beyond the conquest. She hates how he makes her feel, but at the same time she can’t deny how he makes her feel, and she’s not equipped to hide those feels. She wishes she could have gotten guys like him out of her system when she was 16, without a marriage and kids hanging in the balance... or weighing her down. <gulp>
***
I think that the suitors in this story, husband vs coworker, made the lead-up to the choice more complicated. These two characters were, for the most part, never in the same place at the same time. They were never reacting to the same things in a way that we, the reader, could compare them. Instead, Molly bounced between them, and we had to experience them like different teams taking turns.
I also felt like you didn’t really go into the allure of straying. It is thrilling to have a secret, as well as to be ‘getting away with it’. When you know something other people don’t, that is power. Molly could have been privately getting off (literally or metaphorically) on her office flirtations. Loving it, and loving that it’s a secret. She’s in her 40’s, and she finally has a dirty little secret of her own! Even if she didn’t plan to stray, and even if Andreas was pushing for her to stray and Stuart worrying about her straying, all it would take is that one more straw for her to give in to her curiosity. That's the line you're trying to walk the reader right up to.
You did do a good job of showing Molly’s building frustration with Stuart. I've been married for 10 years myself. I understood her loneliness, and her frustrations, but I didn’t feel like she was at the kind of “any port in a storm” desperation that would have been required to make option B (Andreas) viable or sensible. Or appealing.
***
I was confused by the twist. I had to do a lot of re-reading up and down page 3, and then back to page 2, looking for a scene break I might have missed and now is Molly back at her house?... or maybe did Andreas have kids and I just didn’t know it? I don’t know that you could have done a better job revealing the twist you set up where you revealed it. I do think that perhaps revealing the twist before the sex might have been stronger. Doing that would have theoretically taken some of the edge out of the sex, but I was already out on Andreas. That affair, had it happened, would have had no… bite.
Had Molly gone through with it, I just would have thought less of Molly rather than empathizing with her conflicting desires.
Last edited: