Conager
¿Que? Cornelius!
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2014
- Posts
- 18,282
I guess when you have no case, you go for the "reasonable doubt"
not buying it![]()
No. You always go for reasonable doubt. Conviction depends upon whether not the prosecution has an actual case.
It's never the job of the defendant to prove anything. They don't have a "case" to prove, the prosecution does.
He is not wrong, he did leave out one possibility though. Without a doubt, significant numbers of people who have been given the drug have survived. So either the disease is very survivable, the drug works, or the placebo effect works. If it's the placebo effect working then the rest of you shouldn't fuck with the only thing that we've got at the moment.