Damn, she Justa did it again. Still nothing to see.

Status
Not open for further replies.
A very Valentines Day-esque pair (panties I mean - your pair of tits are appropriate for all holidays). Nice!
I wonder if your co-workers ever wonder why you spend so much time in that room. Actually, I hope they don’t because I like the whole clandestine “I like to take risqué pictures of myself at work” theme.
 
Oooooo Justa. Can we see the front?? Please

I can do that.

Lovely Justa, they are a nice color change. :rose::rose:
thank you. yes, rather feminine for me.

Happy Thursday gorgeous mom :)
thank tou

I love the cheeky bit of the first pic.:devil:
thanks. yes, quite cheeky

This is making my morning excellent
thanks, glad to brighten ones day. almost friday.


A very Valentines Day-esque pair (panties I mean - your pair of tits are appropriate for all holidays). Nice!
I wonder if your co-workers ever wonder why you spend so much time in that room. Actually, I hope they don’t because I like the whole clandestine “I like to take risqué pictures of myself at work” theme.

it is, isn't it? I am sure there are holidays that don't pair well with tits. I need to thank about that though.

I assume if they noticed, they think I am hiding and browsing reddit like everyone else. I actual, look around and make sure there is no one outside the bathroom. then I don't go into the shower unless the restroom is empty. I don't want people to know it isn't a small cleaning supply closet. Then if someone comes in, I stay silent. Down side of hiding in a restroom is learning how many people don't wash their hands when they think the bathroom is empty.



You make my tongue drag out, so if it gets dirty...it is your fault! Just saying! :devil::devil::devil:

haha. a dirty tongue is the best kind of tongue.

Love those undies... they look so good on that amazing bottom of yours.:rose::rose::rose:

thank you. thank you very much
 
So todays ramble. Well, prepping for valentine’s day. 39 children’s gift boxes (school and after school program). Kid wanted to bring burgers as his item for the Valentine’s after school party, so hubby will be dropping off 25 burgers today. Hubby works about 3 minutes from there, as well as from fast food. I work 50 minutes from there. Thus hubby gets stuck with stuff like that. I overdo holidays. I should probably not, but eh.

Now every Valentine’s day since having a kid enter school, as I look at the list of first names, I think what the fuck. Now, it is none of my business what you name your kid, but I can’t help but be thoroughly confused as to why many pick what they do. Ok, the first group, 4 out of 19 names contained non-alphabetical characters. 7 out of 19 were not pronounceable without deep thought, 4 out of the remaining 11 were not spelled in a way that I have ever seen. 2 were common names spelled backwards. 2 girls actually have the same non name object label, think along the lines of Cadillac, except one was spelled K’dlack and the other Cad’ylac. Now the teacher sent the list out middle of January, so I asked my son if it was still correct. He said there was a newer boy missing named like Roman. Not super common, but easy spelling, no problem. We made the extra, and he looks at Roman written and asks me if I am sure, all I can say is Well, that is how the word Roman is spelled. I also drop the teacher a message she should probably send out an updated list, as I am not sure all 6 years olds would catch that (my child is very weird). She sent it out yesterday, and also responded to my message with thanks, and btw spelling. Apparently yes, Roman has a silent Y so Romayn (obviously this is not the true name, but it is close enough to give the idea)

Anyway, I just don’t understand this trend. I assume most mothers thought long and hard about names. I took many factors into account. I considered the ability to shorten it into nicknames that worked through out life. A jock type nickname, nerd type, conservative type, liberal type, even a gender neutral/opposite gender type. I also took scientific studies into account. For example, studies showing more effeminate boys names result in more behavior problems in school, lower grades, and lower success rates. Non-traditional names and differences in perception are seen as young as 4. Teachers call on them less, include them less, grade them harder, they get lower score, less scholarships, they are less likely to be called back for jobs they are qualified for, less likely to get promotions, viewed as less competent, more likely to engage in criminal behavior, and more likely to end up in a low socio-economic status. I considered names that are viewed favorably, names that are tied to success. I even considered and rejected a long family custom of the name first born males on my father’s side are given, much to the silent dislike of the generations prior. I considered likely geolocation, risk of regular repetition in the classroom, Initials etc. Point is, my short list was years in the making.

So yeah, mothers think long and hard about names. I assume this unusual uptick is a moral stance against the subconscious cues people take from names. I get it. It is not fair and I don’t like it. However, I do not understand creating a disadvantage for my own child as a moral stance. If I want to stand up for something, I will do it myself, and do my best to protect my child from the blow back. If I am stacking the deck in relation to my child, I am stacking the deck for him. I just couldn’t imagine stacking the deck against my child’s success. As a mother, I want my child to have every advantage I had and every advantage I did not have. So yeah, names list baffle me every year.

Anyway, there is my pointless rambling for the day.
Here is the front of my panties as requested
http://i.imgur.com/gUHcDN6m.jpg
 
I go by the rule that you need to imagine your kid as an 80 year old. When you are that age, will your name make sense? I know that a normative societal viewpoint and perhaps I should be more woke, but I stick by it regardless. That being said, cultures are changing and for some, the “unique” name is actually their “normal.” While I now know it was wrong, we definitely teased kids when I was young about their name. My kids are much more tolerant and open.
And I always appreciate the front view. Maybe we should see a comparison - with and without panties!
 
So todays ramble. Well, prepping for valentine’s day. 39 children’s gift boxes (school and after school program). Kid wanted to bring burgers as his item for the Valentine’s after school party, so hubby will be dropping off 25 burgers today. Hubby works about 3 minutes from there, as well as from fast food. I work 50 minutes from there. Thus hubby gets stuck with stuff like that. I overdo holidays. I should probably not, but eh.

Now every Valentine’s day since having a kid enter school, as I look at the list of first names, I think what the fuck. Now, it is none of my business what you name your kid, but I can’t help but be thoroughly confused as to why many pick what they do. Ok, the first group, 4 out of 19 names contained non-alphabetical characters. 7 out of 19 were not pronounceable without deep thought, 4 out of the remaining 11 were not spelled in a way that I have ever seen. 2 were common names spelled backwards. 2 girls actually have the same non name object label, think along the lines of Cadillac, except one was spelled K’dlack and the other Cad’ylac. Now the teacher sent the list out middle of January, so I asked my son if it was still correct. He said there was a newer boy missing named like Roman. Not super common, but easy spelling, no problem. We made the extra, and he looks at Roman written and asks me if I am sure, all I can say is Well, that is how the word Roman is spelled. I also drop the teacher a message she should probably send out an updated list, as I am not sure all 6 years olds would catch that (my child is very weird). She sent it out yesterday, and also responded to my message with thanks, and btw spelling. Apparently yes, Roman has a silent Y so Romayn (obviously this is not the true name, but it is close enough to give the idea)

Anyway, I just don’t understand this trend. I assume most mothers thought long and hard about names. I took many factors into account. I considered the ability to shorten it into nicknames that worked through out life. A jock type nickname, nerd type, conservative type, liberal type, even a gender neutral/opposite gender type. I also took scientific studies into account. For example, studies showing more effeminate boys names result in more behavior problems in school, lower grades, and lower success rates. Non-traditional names and differences in perception are seen as young as 4. Teachers call on them less, include them less, grade them harder, they get lower score, less scholarships, they are less likely to be called back for jobs they are qualified for, less likely to get promotions, viewed as less competent, more likely to engage in criminal behavior, and more likely to end up in a low socio-economic status. I considered names that are viewed favorably, names that are tied to success. I even considered and rejected a long family custom of the name first born males on my father’s side are given, much to the silent dislike of the generations prior. I considered likely geolocation, risk of regular repetition in the classroom, Initials etc. Point is, my short list was years in the making.

So yeah, mothers think long and hard about names. I assume this unusual uptick is a moral stance against the subconscious cues people take from names. I get it. It is not fair and I don’t like it. However, I do not understand creating a disadvantage for my own child as a moral stance. If I want to stand up for something, I will do it myself, and do my best to protect my child from the blow back. If I am stacking the deck in relation to my child, I am stacking the deck for him. I just couldn’t imagine stacking the deck against my child’s success. As a mother, I want my child to have every advantage I had and every advantage I did not have. So yeah, names list baffle me every year.

Anyway, there is my pointless rambling for the day.
Here is the front of my panties as requested
http://i.imgur.com/gUHcDN6m.jpg
I considered middle names and how they would look as initials. SAC, SIC were discarded.

Love the panties and other attractions. ;)
 
I go by the rule that you need to imagine your kid as an 80 year old. When you are that age, will your name make sense? I know that a normative societal viewpoint and perhaps I should be more woke, but I stick by it regardless. That being said, cultures are changing and for some, the “unique” name is actually their “normal.” While I now know it was wrong, we definitely teased kids when I was young about their name. My kids are much more tolerant and open.
And I always appreciate the front view. Maybe we should see a comparison - with and without panties!

I think that makes sense, though not sure I will go with 80, otherwise there is a 6 year old Beatrice walking around. I am sure there is way less teasing, but the unconscious biases are still there. K'dlack Pszczyna is less likely to be called in for an interview if there were many equally qualified candidates. People don't even realize they do it, but they go for the easier to pronounce, gender they can identify so they know to use Mr. or Ms.

And maybe I will, but not now. Running away cheerfully.
 
I considered middle names and how they would look as initials. SAC, SIC were discarded.

Love the panties and other attractions. ;)

lol. I did the same too. I guess from those years spent in arcades lol. I also rhymed names, etc. my final list was years in the making.

and thank you
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top