Tulsi Gabbard is a white nationalist Russian plant

She has to be. Too hot looking to be a democrat and too smart to be a republican.
 
The point of the issue isn't what Tulsi Gabbard is doing--it's what the Russians (you know, the folks who own Donald Trump and have done this before) are doing.
 
The point of the issue isn't what Tulsi Gabbard is doing--it's what the Russians (you know, the folks who own Donald Trump and have done this before) are doing.

And what exactly are "the Russians" supposedly doing?
 
And what exactly are "the Russians" supposedly doing?

Nothing, nothing at all. They never did anything, and they are doing nothing now.
They never interfered with our election in 2016, and they have not funneled any cash through any soviet-born Ukrainians to anyone in the US. They have not tried to influence any sitting congressman to do favors for money. They have not funneled any foreign money to PACs. Nothing to see, witch hunt, witch hunt, hoax. :rolleyes:

It's all fake news, enemy of the people, but if you read it, you might not have to ask your question.
 
And what exactly are "the Russians" supposedly doing?
Signal boosting the colorful candidate with the idealistic devoted followers,the candidate who is stoking establishment resentment and sowing discord within the Democratic party, blaming her lack of popularity and momentum on "the DNC elite" and "the media" instead of her own inabilities to connect with primary voters on the issues that consern the ones outside of her bubble.

All in an attempt to repeat the "Bernie bro" resentment (both towards them and towards Clinton from them) during the 2016 election and thus siphon off voters from whoever the D candidate eventually is.

Supposedly, I should add. Before some idiot demands I provide proof.
 
I understand there is a search on for volunteers for interplanetary explorers. I nominate the Clit'n's to get the fuck off'n my world.
 
Clinton M.O.

If Mrs. Clinton's attack on Tulsi Gabbard is not enough to prove to people that she is an evil power monger that uses character attacks as a weapon to discredit anyone in her way... what would it take? History will brand her as one of the most evil women of this era. Her crimes are thinly covered for now because of the power she wields. But history will drill past the layers of deceit and expose her for the monster that she really is.
 
If Mrs. Clinton's attack on Tulsi Gabbard is not enough to prove to people that she is an evil power monger

Only to the really, really stupid. Especially since she's pointing to repeated Russian propaganda Swiftboating more than to Gabbard. This isn't something Gabbard is doing; it's something the Russians are doing (and have done this before). Hillary Clinton is smart enough to know that even if you aren't. Clinton said that Gabbard is being set up by the Russians as a favorite not that Gabbard is making the Russians a favorite (https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...C4036A636D9E545A336AC4036A636D9E&&FORM=VDRVRV) Any chance you can understand the difference between those two?
 
All persons who are neither Socialist/Communist nor Hillary Clinton ARE Russian Agents.
 
Try not to show as even more stupid that you are....

What? (Stop drinking, you wino.)


Other than that, I don't like making fun of you anymore or calling you out on your lies because you only get louder and more pathetic by the post.

What I want to know is: When was the last time you took off your tinfoil cap?
 
All persons who are neither Socialist/Communist nor Hillary Clinton ARE Russian Agents.

No they're not. And you are an extreme partisan nut job to claim they are. Some folks, like Donald Trump, are easy to pick out as blackmailed Russian assets because of what they say with their with own big mouth/little brain, what they try to hide, and what they do. List all of the instances in the last two years that Donald Trump has voluntarily done/said something that didn't benefit Vladimir Putin. Take your time, because both you and I know you can't do that (well, I know. You, being an extreme partisan with limited mental capacity probably haven't figured it out).

It's a pile of crap to claim what you do from that.

Once again, Hillary Clinton's comments are about what the Russians are doing (and have done before) rather than what Tulsi Gabbard is doing. She may not like the postions Gabbard is taking (some of which I think are quite fine), but her comments are about Russian actions. I'm not surprised you are too dense to be able/willing to see the difference.
 
Last edited:
The Klit'n Klan is pure evil, through to the core.

Well, no, they have overweaning ambition--at least Hillary does--and Bill can't keep his zipper up--but that doesn't make them pure evil. If you want to be so one-dimensional, however, that's your privilege and your limited intelligence reputation to live with.
 
Expain it to Tulsi Gabbard

Only to the really, really stupid. Especially since she's pointing to repeated Russian propaganda Swiftboating more than to Gabbard. This isn't something Gabbard is doing; it's something the Russians are doing (and have done this before). Hillary Clinton is smart enough to know that even if you aren't. Clinton said that Gabbard is being set up by the Russians as a favorite not that Gabbard is making the Russians a favorite (https://www.bing.com/videos/search?...C4036A636D9E545A336AC4036A636D9E&&FORM=VDRVRV) Any chance you can understand the difference between those two?

Right away you need to attack the intellect of anyone that disagrees with you. I wonder where you developed that trait. Have you heard Tulsi Gabbards's comments about what Clinton HAS SAID ABOUT HER?
 
Right away you need to attack the intellect of anyone that disagrees with you. I wonder where you developed that trait. Have you heard Tulsi Gabbards's comments about what Clinton HAS SAID ABOUT HER?

Naw, I only attack the obviously idiotic/rightwing indoctrinated Trumpettes, which you have proven to be across the board.

If you have something substantive to contribute, do it directly and sourced; don't allude to it. You've shown you can't be objective.

I provided sources clearly showing that Clinton's comments are about what the Russians are doing (and have done before). Gabbard isn't responsible for what the Russians are doing to promote her publicly to the weak of brain, as you have shown to be across the discussion board.

Do it quick, though, because you are going almost immediately on ignore as a total tool.
 
There is NOTHING good or honorable or redeeming or of any value at all in the Klit'ns. Not one damn thing. They're pure dirt.
 
There is NOTHING good or honorable or redeeming or of any value at all in the Klit'ns. Not one damn thing. They're pure dirt.

Umm, OK. I'm sure you've reviewed all they have done in life to reach that sweeping generalization. (Glad I haven't become that embittered with life.)

So, I take it that Charles Manson being a 10 for you, Hill and Bill are solid 12s. :rolleyes:
 
If Mrs. Clinton's attack on Tulsi Gabbard is not enough to prove to people that she is an evil power monger that uses character attacks as a weapon to discredit anyone in her way... what would it take? History will brand her as one of the most evil women of this era. Her crimes are thinly covered for now because of the power she wields. But history will drill past the layers of deceit and expose her for the monster that she really is.

https://steemitimages.com/p/hgjbks2vRxvp3qu9YiP5LbshBUFN36zQRZKjdYd5LvNoQ11WUyXVktYPugFdAyvhgG1PitnAkyrQufSknZRnTqwytA?format=match&mode=fit
 
Back
Top