LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

But SERVER!!!

KeithD said:
All we would need do is substitute the name "Trump" for "Obama" and the two-faced Harpy would be singing an entirely different tune. The Trumpette positions on this have nothing to do with the reality that Trump is a corrupt, treasonous criminal.
Click to expand...

I support the law. Nothing more, nothing less.

It is a shame that you and others like you, do not.
 
Carnal_Flower said:
Trump handed out the transcript of his call himself, against the advice of many of his advisors.

If there's a "leak" the info is always in doubt, but if the Prez does it, it's straight from the horse's mouth.

And yes we do have business knowing, if it involves POTUS's criminal treasonous activity.

The "not our business" was tried with the Oval Office Tapes. He lost.
Click to expand...

Do you have a cite to this information?

A google search showed no information on whether anyone opposed Trump's release of the transcript. So if you have a cite, please share it.
 
HisArpy said:
Do you have a cite to this information?

A google search showed no information on whether anyone opposed Trump's release of the transcript. So if you have a cite, please share it.
Click to expand...

More lies I suspect.
 
HisArpy said:
I support the law. Nothing more, nothing less.

It is a shame that you and others like you, do not.
Click to expand...

You’re talking to someone that believes in guilty until proven innocent not the other way around.
 
Kantarii said:
You’re talking to someone that believes in guilty until proven innocent not the other way around.
Click to expand...

Keith is a lying little termite who thinks that force and intimidation are what gets him someplace.
 
Pence advised Trump against releasing partial transcript of Ukraine call: reporthttps://thehill.com/homenews/administration/463337-pence-advised-trump-against-releasing-partial-transcript-of-ukraine

Pompeo and Mnuchin reportedly urged Trump not to release the Ukraine call transcript

Seven days: Inside Trump’s frenetic response to the whistleblower complaint and the battle over impeachment


Heading into the weekend, White House aides were divided over how to handle calls for him to release the transcript of his call with Zelensky and the full whistleblower complaint.

Over days of discussions, Justice Department officials — including Attorney General William P. Barr — and some of the president’s lawyers urged him to release notes from the call before he traveled to New York on Sunday to attend the United Nations General Assembly this week. But others, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, vociferously argued against it, and Trump delayed a decision.
Click to expand...

Dumb shit. It was all over the Internets. And if you're going to babble about Fake News, no one wants to hear it.

HisArpy said:
Do you have a cite to this information?

A google search showed no information on whether anyone opposed Trump's release of the transcript. So if you have a cite, please share it.
Click to expand...
 
Apparently some 35 Republican Senators would vote to remove Trump from office. It's just a matter of getting them on the public record (and possibly going against the wishes of their constituents).
 
von_Bismarck said:
Apparently some 35 Republican Senators would vote to remove Trump from office. It's just a matter of getting them on the public record (and possibly going against the wishes of their constituents).
Click to expand...

But it was Flake who said that. The same Flake who pussed out against Trump after talking tough.
 
Now, now, I'm sure they would have PERFECTLY OK with Obama abusing the Intelligence Servers to store evidence of his exortion of foreign leaders to get dirt on Romney.

KeithD said:
All we would need do is substitute the name "Trump" for "Obama" and the two-faced Harpy would be singing an entirely different tune. The Trumpette positions on this have nothing to do with the reality that Trump is a corrupt, treasonous criminal.
Click to expand...
 
KeithD said:
All we would need do is substitute the name "Trump" for "Obama" and the two-faced Harpy would be singing an entirely different tune. The Trumpette positions on this have nothing to do with the reality that Trump is a corrupt, treasonous criminal.
Click to expand...

Whatabout, whataabout, whatabout....

(And you use it as an insult. Loser.)

Carnal_Flower said:
Now, now, I'm sure they would have PERFECTLY OK with Obama abusing the Intelligence Servers to store evidence of his exortion of foreign leaders to get dirt on Romney.
Click to expand...

Whatabout, whataabout, whatabout....

(And you use it as an insult. Loser.)
 
Carnal_Flower said:
Pence advised Trump against releasing partial transcript of Ukraine call: reporthttps://thehill.com/homenews/administration/463337-pence-advised-trump-against-releasing-partial-transcript-of-ukraine

Pompeo and Mnuchin reportedly urged Trump not to release the Ukraine call transcript

Seven days: Inside Trump’s frenetic response to the whistleblower complaint and the battle over impeachment




Dumb shit. It was all over the Internets. And if you're going to babble about Fake News, no one wants to hear it.
Click to expand...

Good. Thank you for that information.



Now, let's talk about why you think it was TRUMP who was trying to obstruct Congress and conceal the transcript. Because it seems to me that Trump was good to go with releasing it and it was his "ADVISORS" (as you put it) who were trying to keep it secret.

Perhaps it is Pompeo and the rest who should be charged with attempted obstruction and not Trump?
 
You're confused. Maybe you need to take a break.

The "obstruction" at issue in this while past week was not Trump refusing to release the transcript; did I say that? I don't recall saying that. If anything was being obstructed (at first), it was the WB Report getting to Congress. That is the whole reason this all blew up. If the WH and the DOJ hadn't decided to forbid the DNI from following the law and handing it over, it would never have become the big issue it did, therefore leading to them being forced to hand it over.

You actually don't know what's going on; please try and keep up with the rest of the class.

HisArpy said:
Good. Thank you for that information.



Now, let's talk about why you think it was TRUMP who was trying to obstruct Congress and conceal the transcript. Because it seems to me that Trump was good to go with releasing it and it was his "ADVISORS" (as you put it) who were trying to keep it secret.

Perhaps it is Pompeo and the rest who should be charged with attempted obstruction and not Trump?
Click to expand...
 
HisArpy said:
Do you have a cite to this information?

A google search showed no information on whether anyone opposed Trump's release of the transcript. So if you have a cite, please share it.
Click to expand...
Google hates you.
 
HisArpy said:
Good. Thank you for that information.



Now, let's talk about why you think it was TRUMP who was trying to obstruct Congress and conceal the transcript. Because it seems to me that Trump was good to go with releasing it and it was his "ADVISORS" (as you put it) who were trying to keep it secret.

Perhaps it is Pompeo and the rest who should be charged with attempted obstruction and not Trump?
Click to expand...

actually to release these calls means no foreign leader can ever talk to the US and feel comfortable
 
Carnal_Flower said:
You're confused. Maybe you need to take a break.

The "obstruction" at issue in this while past week was not Trump refusing to release the transcript; did I say that? I don't recall saying that. If anything was being obstructed (at first), it was the WB Report getting to Congress. That is the whole reason this all blew up. If the WH and the DOJ hadn't decided to forbid the DNI from following the law and handing it over, it would never have become the big issue it did, therefore leading to them being forced to hand it over.

You actually don't know what's going on; please try and keep up with the rest of the class.
Click to expand...


Umm, you DO realize that Schiff had the whistleblower complaint back in July or August (IIRC), right?

So, your ENTIRE BS NARRATIVE is just that, BS.

Then there's this: Haven't you wondered why there's a similarity between Feinswine's keeping the Ford letter secret and Schiff keeping the whistleblower complaint secret yet"?


THEY.
ARE.
LYING.
TO.
YOU.

And you're sucking it up like dog chow.
 
Last edited:
beezzz said:
actually to release these calls means no foreign leader can ever talk to the US and feel comfortable
Click to expand...

What it really means is that everything is going to go through the State Dept now and Trump will be having more face-to-face conversations with no transcripts while using foreign translators who cannot be subpoenaed to testify before kangaroo congress.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

canonrfshooter
Tea app for women
Replies
3
Views
287
razor33a
R
S
Pixiehoff
Replies
1
Views
471
Lumiere_Amie
Lumiere_Amie
RachelWalsh
LIT POLITICA-- No Perving, just Politics
2
Replies
34
Views
1K
RachelWalsh
RachelWalsh
C
But, is it drugs?
Replies
4
Views
241
bboner4u
bboner4u
J
Lien Geller
Replies
0
Views
97
JoeOzo
J
Back
Top