But SERVER!!!

Now this makes it really interesting if it's true. This might be Nixon tapes level shit. That would be fun.
 
It's amazing how often the Left has to ignore it's own history to promote the anti-Trump hysteria they're peddling.

"It's a-ok if Trump did it" totally fails to even consider that Hillary did it FIRST and they were "a-ok with it" then.

Or maybe they're too stupid to realize that people can actually google things.

That's because they think it's only hypocritical when non-progressive leftist do it.

They don't realize THEY set that standard.
 
oh I know

the LEAKER said so.....

and YU believe it? WHY? On the first page he said he got all this SECOND HAND....and on footnote 5 he says he got stuff from the MEDIA


so why do you believe it?


Further, if the WH gets wind its conversations have been COMPORMISED, f course they would take measures to PROTECT ITSELF

It only makes sense


SO WHATS THE ISSUE:cool:
 
Two morons who kiss 45's ass and excuse everything he does think I'm a hypocrite.

Thanks guys! :rose::D
 
The WelfareQueen (who has never spent one fucking dime out of pocket on his own health care while braying ceaselessly about the need to keep poor people from healthcare) is lecturing others on "hypocrisy".

His lack of self-awareness is astounding.

Never been on welfare, never got free healthcare, nor have I ever advocated keeping poor people from healthcare.

Your outright lies are not a lack of self awareness on my part.
 
The whistleblower admits to hearsay (“I was not a direct witness to most of the events described”). His term-paper report is laden with anonymously sourced rumors, e.g., “According to multiple White House officials I spoke with,” “I was told by White House officials,” “Based on my understanding,” “I learned from multiple officials,” “I do not know whether similar measures were taken,” “I do not know whether those officials spoke with or met with . . . ”

Between references to Internet news accounts and “I heard from” and “I learned from” and “I do not know” anonymous officials,


but hey, lets believe what he(she) says:rolleyes:
 
What a bunch of dumbasses. How can anyone read this released declassified transcript and not ask why it was classified in the first place? And that doesnt bother them? Seriously fucked up. But the good news, when we win the next election...what goes around comes around bitches. Bend the fuck over. Or....you can follow established protocols. Choice is simple
 
Here's the full account:

White House lawyers directed White House officials to remove the electronic transcript of the Zelensky call from the computer system where such transcripts normally are stored. That transcript then was loaded into a “separate electronic system” that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature. “One White House official described this act as an abuse of this electronic system because the call did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective.”

Sounds like a "secret server" to me. And now Congress knows about it LOLOLOLOL. I bet letters have already gone out forbidding anyone to tamper with that server. Eventually Trump will have his secretary say "Oh Gosh, I didn't know, I accidently deleted the all the files from July, whoops!"

You have almost reached Schiff's level of lying. You need some more practice.
 
Here's the full account:



Sounds like a "secret server" to me. And now Congress knows about it LOLOLOLOL. I bet letters have already gone out forbidding anyone to tamper with that server. Eventually Trump will have his secretary say "Oh Gosh, I didn't know, I accidently deleted the all the files from July, whoops!"

Hopefully he has some folks smash it up with a hammer. :D
 
Ask Nixon how that worked out for him.

Way to completely miss the reference. you do, however, raise an excellent point: record retention sure seems to matter much more if there's an R after one's name that when there's a D.
 
Way to completely miss the reference. you do, however, raise an excellent point: record retention sure seems to matter much more if there's an R after one's name that when there's a D.

Sorry it went over your head. Let me dumb it down for you cowboy. Should any Govt official follow established guidelines concerning record keeping? I say yes.
 
Sorry it went over your head. Let me dumb it down for you cowboy. Should any Govt official follow established guidelines concerning record keeping? I say yes.

At a height of 5'6", more goes over my little buddy's head than you might imagine.
 
That's called whataboutism.

In fact the two situations are exactly the opposite of each other. Hillary used a private server for gubmint bidness (like Colin Powell and a lot of other people), thereby putting possibly sensitive gov't information at risk. Trump, on the other hand, dumped his own personal, private, political dirt and evidence into THE most highly protected storage system of the entire US gov't.

Why yes, you could say "record retention" is at issue with both, but that's hardly the salient point.


Way to completely miss the reference. you do, however, raise an excellent point: record retention sure seems to matter much more if there's an R after one's name that when there's a D.
 
Back
Top