just another hate-filled young, white, american male

[HisArpy]

Last I checked the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was about as left wing as it gets....and their ideals are being promoted by the far left wing of the (D)'s. Condemned by even moderate (D)'s.

You should talk to Sean, he believes that Russia is "centre right".

 

[HisArpy]

The Second is fine as it's written. The problem is the overly broad interpretation and dissection of every word, rather than taking it as a whole

Ask yourself; if this is your view of the Second Amendment, why isn't it also your view of the First?

 

[toeskr]

Ask yourself; if this is your view of the Second Amendment, why isn't it also your view of the First?

Yeah, puk slinked off on a similar question before.

Why can't they reconcile?

Hmm?

Can't fit the narrative I guess.

 

[Specula]

I guess the 'participation award" wasn't enough.


I could never, ever bring up a child in today's liberal snowflake environment. I made the right choice.

I thought the US neo-Nazis were the problem these days, LOL

 

[Rightguide]

'Well regulated Militia' doesn't mean every crackpot and goofball being able to stockpile military grade weapons and tens of thousands of rounds.

It's what comes after the comma that counts, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." because that is what's amending the original document, it's literally saying the right already exists and predates the Constitution.

 

[butters]

It's what comes after the comma that counts, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." because that is what's amending the original document, it's literally saying the right already exists and predates the Constitution.

it says people have the right to carry arms legally - which isn't the same as stockpiling arms and munitions.

 

[Rightguide]

it says people have the right to carry arms legally - which isn't the same as stockpiling arms and munitions.

You don't know what you're talking about. The 2A doesn't say that. Where in the law is the amount of arms and ammunition one can legally possess specified? Show me.

 

[butters]

You don't know what you're talking about. The 2A doesn't say that. Where in the law is the amount of arms and ammunition one can legally possess specified? Show me.

 

[Rightguide]

Yeah well, so show me the law that limits the amount of guns and ammunition a law abiding citizen can own. Truth is, you don't know shit and should keep your uninformed nose out of our business.

 

[butters]

Yeah well, so show me the law that limits the amount of guns and ammunition a law abiding citizen can own. Truth is, you don't know shit and should keep your uninformed nose out of our business.

oh dear....

i'll remember that when out shopping (not too likely to happen to me in a church) and someone feels like shooting shit up. i live in america. that makes it my business.

back to thinking you're superior to a woman, little one. bless your heart.

 

[BotanyBoy]

it says people have the right to carry arms legally - which isn't the same as stockpiling arms and munitions.

Jesus Christ....where does she come up with this shit??

oh dear....

i'll remember that when out shopping (not too likely to happen to me in a church) and someone feels like shooting shit up. i live in america. that makes it my business.

People shooting shit up has nothing to do with stockpiling or even what kind of weapon someone owns.

back to thinking you're superior to a woman, little one. bless your heart.

Always the victim of her vag even when it was never brought up, classic diversion tactic for weaker women who can't stand by their argument and or are not adult enough to own their fuck ups.

That's not how "bless your heart" is used.....you need to spend more time in the dirty dirty south.

Yeah well, so show me the law that limits the amount of guns and ammunition a law abiding citizen can own. Truth is, you don't know shit and should keep your uninformed nose out of our business.

Poor Butters, caught with her ignorance hanging out again....

 

[Rightguide]

oh dear....

i'll remember that when out shopping (not too likely to happen to me in a church) and someone feels like shooting shit up. i live in america. that makes it my business.

back to thinking you're superior to a woman, little one. bless your heart.

You didn't answer my question, because you're full of crap.

I will always be superior to your peanut sized brain, male or female.

 

[Rightguide]

Poor Butters, caught with her ignorance hanging out again....

Butters is a willfully ignorant tool of the left. The epitome of intellectual miniaturization.

 

[L3gacy]

https://youtu.be/u8c2wKISv0o

I’m tired of all the gun complaining.
I don’t understand it. Obviously loss of life is tragic. People killing innocents is tragic. I don’t get why so many jump on the “ban the guns” wagon.

I see those that want to ban the guns also calling people “neo nazis” and “fascist”.... but then they adhere to Hitlers philosophy “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens”

I just don’t get it. Look at the numbers

 

[Rightguide]

https://youtu.be/u8c2wKISv0o

I’m tired of all the gun complaining.
I don’t understand it. Obviously loss of life is tragic. People killing innocents is tragic. I don’t get why so many jump on the “ban the guns” wagon.

I see those that want to ban the guns also calling people “neo nazis” and “fascist”.... but then they adhere to Hitlers philosophy “To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens”

I just don’t get it. Look at the numbers

Because they are freedom hating totalitarian thinkers. This is who they are and will always be.

 

[bodysong]

Four mass shootings—all plotted by young white men—have been thwarted since El Paso

-Mother Jones

 

[LesDesirable]

Because KNOWS that the problem is Guns, and that if they can get rid of the 'Assault Weapons', semi-automatic weapons, high capacity firearms, private firearms arsenals, private ammunition stockpiles, gun-shows, intermediate sniper weapons, gun rights advocacy groups, that access to firearms will become difficult and in time, shootings will become a less common event.

Of course, it will require a mass confiscation and national registry to get the already owned weapons under control, and it may require the ATF to take extreme measures at the borders to prevent the import of new weapons of war, but those are acceptable risks to preserve our safety. A new War on Weapons to go with the Wars on Terror, Wars on Illegal Immigration, and War on Drugs, if you like.

We make News Stations register with the FCC if they want Air-time. We make travelers register with the State Department if they want to travel overseas.
Why can't we make the right to bear arms a qualified right for those who are least likely to abuse the right? Well Regulated - means that the Government may dictate the required armory for inclusion in a militia.

In the Revolutionary times, each man was expected to have a working musket, bayonet, powder, and shot. Today each militiaman should be required to present a working M4 at the local police station, with his allotment of 600 rounds in 20 round magazines in order to prove that he will be useful should the militia be called.

 

[jaF0]

I'm a moron.

Yes. We know.

 

[bigsly]

it says people have the right to carry arms legally - which isn't the same as stockpiling arms and munitions.

No, the 2nd COMMANDS government that it shall not infringe on an unalienable right (to protect "life, liberty and" property) American citizens naturally have in America, regardless of government.

Only a native socialist/progressive/collectivist fantasizes that only government grants rights, and that if government doesn't grant a certain right (your "stocking arms and munitions" example above), then citizens don't have that right.

America's revolutionary war began ("the shot heard round the world") when the colonist's British government troops forcefully tried to confiscate the "stockpiling arms and munitions" in Concord, but, instead, got their skirts chased all the way back to Boston.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No, the 2nd COMMANDS government that it shall not infringe on an unalienable right (to protect "life, liberty and" property) American citizens naturally have in America, regardless of government.

Only a native socialist/progressive/collectivist fantasizes that only government grants rights, and that if government doesn't grant a certain right (your "stocking arms and munitions" example above), then citizens don't have that right.

America's revolutionary war began ("the shot heard round the world") when the colonist's British government troops forcefully tried to confiscate the "stockpiling arms and munitions" in Concord, but, instead, got their skirts chased all the way back to Boston.

Collectivist authoritarians like Butters don't seem to understand the liberal mindset nor do they seem aware that the USA was NOT founded by Mao on a totalitarian leftist ideology.

They find the very notion of individual civil rights appalling....clearly.

 

[LesDesirable]

Yes. We know.

You should attempt to remain an observer as your username implies. Every time you post, you exceed the limitations of your intellectual capacity.

 

[butters]

someone find that bloody test about where we stood on the authoritarian/liberal/anarchy/whatever chart please? i want to post the link to my results to shove sideways up botboi's lying arse. authoritarian, am i? like fuckity-fuck am i. that lyin' loser needs to check himself.

 

[heathergives]

You should attempt to remain an observer as your username implies. Every time you post, you exceed the limitations of your intellectual capacity.

His "worthless toad" descriptor certainly fits.

 

[BotanyBoy]

someone find that bloody test about where we stood on the authoritarian/liberal/anarchy/whatever chart please? i want to post the link to my results to shove sideways up botboi's lying arse. authoritarian, am i? like fuckity-fuck am i. that lyin' loser needs to check himself.

You've openly supported the infringement of my 1A and 2A civil rights.

You've openly expressed that you are anti-freedom of association and freedom of commerce.

You've also openly supported the government taking my shit and redistributing it as you see fit.

No E-test is going to change the fact that you're openly against individual liberty and US Civil rights via top down authority and control.....own it or quit promoting it.

 

[bellisarius]

They don't seem to realize (she isn't the only one) that they are behaving and advocating exactly like the people they say they "hate." Not a dimes worth of difference between the two.