just another hate-filled young, white, american male

It's the whiteness and the masculinity which is soooooo toxic.



Fascists?? LOL

Not being a white male loathing communist doesn't make someone a fascist.



Well, that is what the left is preaching.....advocating.

they all openly want to come take his shit because he's white and male and give it to a POC in the name of social justice.

I hope the left pushes that narrative until the wheels fall off.:D



Liberalism and individualism are not white supremacist cults nor a sense of hijacked-entitlement but the more you conflate them the more the white supremacist cults win.

Keep pushing white guilt and masculinity being toxic....make sure every born Nazi knows their whiteness and maleness is the scourge of humanity.

I make sure my kids know they are hated and loathed for their whiteness, which inherently makes them white supremacist.

I make sure they know their mere existence oppresses people of of color and that is why so many hate them.

Especially the boy who is hated even more so because he has a penis. When they are older I'll let them know that believing in things like individual liberty and civil rights makes them white supremacist and Nazis in the eyes of Democrats and other leftist.

Laughingboi, if you ever find yourself, you're going to be very disappointed
 
They said they found him in a house that had several guns and 10,000 rounds of ammunition. It didn't say the weapons were his, or whether he owned the house, or that he had personal access to said weapons or ammunition. Not saying he didn't, just that they didn't say he did.
a few more than several... this was all right there in the article link you quoted. didn't you read it, or couldn't you comprehend it? 25 firearms isn't 'a few'
And when agents raided a home where the 18-year-old lived earlier this month, they found about 10,000 rounds of ammunition and a vault full of assault-type weapons and shotguns.
Agents found plenty of firepower in Olsen’s father’s home, though it’s unclear how much of it the 18-year-old could access. There were about 300 rounds of ammunition on a stairway, the FBI says, and thousands of rounds of ammo, camouflage clothing and a gun vault in another bedroom in the house. Agents eventually seized about 15 rifles and shotguns and 10 semiautomatic pistols.
 
a few more than several... this was all right there in the article link you quoted. didn't you read it, or couldn't you comprehend it? 25 firearms isn't 'a few'


A not uncommon number of firearms for an avid hunter, collector, or competitive shooter, but probably too many for an 18 year old to have accumulated legally.
 
Didn't you read it, or couldn't you comprehend it?

Your quote supports his point:

...it’s unclear how much of it the 18-year-old could access...
 
A not uncommon number of firearms for an avid hunter, collector, or competitive shooter, but probably too many for an 18 year old to have accumulated legally.


I was thinking: isn't butters' title misguided?

This no longer sounds like a collection of many random, isolated cases of disenfranchised, angry racist White men. Who go rogue because they spend too much time on hate-mongering sites.

Could it be a bit more coordinated, terrorist sort of movement that is starting to partially mimick ISIS?



I mean a lot of them are the impressionable type, that could be easily recruited (from online sites) and radicalized and brainwashed.

And JaFo commented somewhere that Brenton Tarrant's letter from jail (leaked and posted online) alluded to a “great conflict” that is coming . And he'd spent time before in certain European locations.
 
a few more than several... this was all right there in the article link you quoted. didn't you read it, or couldn't you comprehend it? 25 firearms isn't 'a few'

If you're not a hysterical anti-gun type, it's a few.

But don't let that stop you from pointing out the real problem....whiteness and maleness, the worst things ever!!!
 
Last edited:
Just another angry young white male in Philadelphia...





chipbutty is a freaking retard.
 
38 states needed to amend the Constitution. I don't ever see it happening for the second amendment in any of our lifetimes.
 
38 states needed to amend the Constitution. I don't ever see it happening for the second amendment in any of our lifetimes.

Also considering the 2nd is self protecting....to get rid of it you're essentially going to need to destroy the USA as it's been known to do so.

But we all know that's the whole objective of the left anyhow so maybe they will try.
 
If that's what you believe about the left so be it. I believe the right wants us to just become another state of the reconstituted USSR. And they WILL make you give up your guns.
 
If that's what you believe about the left so be it.

Not what I believe, the (D)'s are openly calling for socialism (USSR political/economic systems), gun control and speech control.

It's a demonstrable fact most explicitly demonstrated by AOC's "Green New Deal" and E. Warrens "Accountable Capitalism Act" .

I believe the right wants us to just become another state of the reconstituted USSR. And they WILL make you give up your guns.

You think it's the right that is calling for socialism and gun control???:confused:

Since when? Can you show any examples of this??

Last I checked the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics was about as left wing as it gets....and their ideals are being promoted by the far left wing of the (D)'s. Condemned by even moderate (D)'s.
 
Last edited:
The Second is fine as it's written. The problem is the overly broad interpretation and dissection of every word, rather than taking it as a whole.

'Well regulated Militia' doesn't mean every crackpot and goofball being able to stockpile military grade weapons and tens of thousands of rounds.

There could be significant restrictions on capabilities and quantities while still being within the original intent and scope. As recently stated in the press, the National Ratchet Asses don't want any restrictions at all. They vehemently oppose any of the changes proposed, even those Donny and Moscow Mitch agree with.

They don't even agree with each other internally which is why they're embroiled in a number of lawsuits and accusations of embezzlement and other misuses of funds.
 
I was thinking: isn't butters' title misguided?

This no longer sounds like a collection of many random, isolated cases of disenfranchised, angry racist White men. Who go rogue because they spend too much time on hate-mongering sites.

Could it be a bit more coordinated, terrorist sort of movement that is starting to partially mimick ISIS?



I mean a lot of them are the impressionable type, that could be easily recruited (from online sites) and radicalized and brainwashed.

And JaFo commented somewhere that Brenton Tarrant's letter from jail (leaked and posted online) alluded to a “great conflict” that is coming . And he'd spent time before in certain European locations.

I think a lot of these little maniacs are primed for violence in the lack of proper home upbringing, no dad at home, social media, and in their schools systems which have been decidedly feminized and administered by radical leftist preaching a lot of unAmerican dogma. Add that to a cesspool of drug infested criminal activity and "presto" a perfectly formed undomesticated barbarian.
 
The Second is fine as it's written. The problem is the overly broad interpretation and dissection of every word, rather than taking it as a whole.

'Well regulated Militia' doesn't mean every crackpot and goofball being able to stockpile military grade weapons and tens of thousands of rounds.

There could be significant restrictions on capabilities and quantities while still being within the original intent and scope. As recently stated in the press, the National Ratchet Asses don't want any restrictions at all. They vehemently oppose any of the changes proposed, even those Donny and Moscow Mitch agree with.

They don't even agree with each other internally which is why they're embroiled in a number of lawsuits and accusations of embezzlement and other misuses of funds.

Read the Heller decision, dopey.
 
The Second is fine as it's written. The problem is the overly broad interpretation and dissection of every word, rather than taking it as a whole.

'Well regulated Militia' doesn't mean every crackpot and goofball being able to stockpile military grade weapons and tens of thousands of rounds.

It's also not a pre-requisite to the individual right.

There could be significant restrictions on capabilities and quantities while still being within the original intent and scope.

Only if you ignore the "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." part of 2A.

There could be significant restrictions on capabilities and quantities while still being within the original intent and scope.

No, there can't, that's why despite their best efforts CA, NJ and other states haven't ever banned anything but accessories.
 
Last edited:
Not what I believe, they are openly calling for socialism (USSR political/economic systems), gun control and speech control.

"In other words, the administration is straining at the bit to regulate how social media networks decide what’s appropriate for their sites. To some tech advocates, that smacks of hypocrisy.

“Ironically, the same people screaming about ‘censorship’ by private companies would empower regulators to decide what kinds of online speech should and shouldn’t be taken down,” Berin Szóka, president of the libertarian-leaning TechFreedom, said in a statement Friday. “After denouncing President Obama for urging the FCC to adopt the strongest possible net neutrality rules, will Republicans now cheer as President Trump dictates how two independent agencies should enforce a bizarro version of net neutrality?”"

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-08-09/etf-post-on-trump-section-230-order
 
"In other words, the administration is straining at the bit to regulate how social media networks decide what’s appropriate for their sites. To some tech advocates, that smacks of hypocrisy.

“Ironically, the same people screaming about ‘censorship’ by private companies would empower regulators to decide what kinds of online speech should and shouldn’t be taken down,” Berin Szóka, president of the libertarian-leaning TechFreedom, said in a statement Friday. “After denouncing President Obama for urging the FCC to adopt the strongest possible net neutrality rules, will Republicans now cheer as President Trump dictates how two independent agencies should enforce a bizarro version of net neutrality?”"

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-08-09/etf-post-on-trump-section-230-order

First off making companies decide to be a platform or publisher and follow the regulations accordingly is hardly speech regulation and certainly nothing like what the left is advocating.

2nd, he's reportedly considering according to leftist sources....hasn't actually done shit.

3rd, this is an LA Times op-ed, might as well be a RAW/Salon piece....the opinion of Mr.Healy is clearly biased as the whole thing drips of "Orange man bad" level TDS.
 
Back
Top