███████████ Mueller Investigation Results Thread ███████████

This is a level of stupidity that is almost too much to even believe.

He singled me out, by name and you think that doesn't make it about me?

It doesn't matter if he says "and others."

And people wonder why I always call you a moron.

It's not our fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.
 
Go read the appointment letter. It's in the last section.

Or you could ask 'Slinger, he's posted it enough on the board already so I'm sure he'd repost it just for you.

Well, second to last. And I guess the DOJ policy he refers to made prosecuting the President permanently not appropriate. So the "no crime no case, game over" question would be moot. In the case of the President, investigate, collect findings, report facts.
 
I do believe the word you're looking for is Wingman, but Swingman has a bit of pizzazz to it. :cool:

Ha. Brilliant voice-to-text error!

Even better that the missing s was missing at the very end of the line and deposited on the first of the next.

I'm pretty sure that President Swingman refers to Clinton. Because, naturally, due to his skill with the saxophone.
 
This is a level of stupidity that is almost too much to even believe.

He singled me out, by name and you think that doesn't make it about me?

It doesn't matter if he says "and others."

And people wonder why I always call you a moron.

I never wonder why you, Adre Luke and Shitter call people morons. It's pretty obvious why- you are projecting your intellectual inferiority.

I could cite the peer reviewed studies that conclusively shows that the lower the IQ the higher that person perceives their intellectual superiority.
 
It's not our fault you can't keep up with the rest of the class.

I realize that's your go to line when you've been asked to clarify your stupidity, but it doesn't work.

I know you think it does, but it really doesn't.

You just look like a moron.

Thanks for playing.
 
I never wonder why you, Adre Luke and Shitter call people morons. It's pretty obvious why- you are projecting your intellectual inferiority.

I could cite the peer reviewed studies that conclusively shows that the lower the IQ the higher that person perceives their intellectual superiority.

Pretty funny coming from the Self Annointed Smartest Guy in the Room. Did you Google those studies, Einstein?
 
Well, second to last. And I guess the DOJ policy he refers to made prosecuting the President permanently not appropriate. So the "no crime no case, game over" question would be moot. In the case of the President, investigate, collect findings, report facts.

Exactly.

So, where are the facts which would lead a reasonable person to believe Trump committed a crime? Are we talking about those facts which Mueller himself couldn't conclude were sufficient? Or are we talking about other facts that $30 million, 2500 subpoenas, 500 witness interviews, and 1.5 million documents couldn't find?

Because of the guidelines and whether they actually do what everyone says they do (and about which there are 3 witnesses who say that Mueller himself said the OLC guidelines didn't affect his determination to not bring charges) and the authorizing statute as well as the appointment letter's terms (plus the second appointment letter from Rosenstein which no one has seen), the final determination was left up to the AG who, along with his assistant AG (you know, the guy who oversaw Mueller's investigation AND who offered to wear a wire to secretly tape Trump in order to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove him), jointly decided that there was insufficient evidence to conclude a crime had been committed.

The investigator and his team of TDS sufferers said there wasn't enough evidence. The investigator's boss looked at the unredacted report and said there isn't enough evidence. The assistant boss who apparently hates Trump also looked at the unredacted report and says there isn't enough evidence.

Please show us where in all of that is the evidence that Trump committed a crime.
 
Last edited:
I realize that's your go to line when you've been asked to clarify your stupidity, but it doesn't work.

I know you think it does, but it really doesn't.

You just look like a moron.

Thanks for playing.

:D

Please try to keep up.
 
Well, you know, Holder was "hand picked". Right?

Don't you just love to hear these libs taking about the President"s "hand picked" Attorney General? As if there was ever an AG who wasn't chosen by the President.:rolleyes::D
 
Pretty funny coming from the Self Annointed Smartest Guy in the Room. Did you Google those studies, Einstein?

How would I Google for studies that I wouldn't know exist, had I not already read about them, idiot.

By the way self-anointed requires that I myself said any such thing. Your feelings of inferiority coupled with Rob's continued repeating of that phrase doesn't make it so.

It's pretty self evident that you're one of the dumbest people on the general board but that doesn't indicate that I've said anything at all about my own intelligence.. my posts speak for themselves as do yours. Your assessment of my posts also speaks to your general level of intelligence.

Your sputtering rage this morning speaks to your frustration with your inability to advance an argument defend your position or to be man enough to walk back the lie that you had any f****** idea about the yield curve until it showed up in your financial news feed. You f****** pathetic poser. I realize that your self-worth is entirely wrapped up in your self description of being this wealthy investor but just knock at the f*** off. You're embarrassing yourself.
 
Exactly.

So, where are the facts which would lead a reasonable person to believe Trump committed a crime? Are we talking about those facts which Mueller himself couldn't conclude were sufficient? Or are we talking about other facts that $30 million, 2500 subpoenas, 500 witness interviews, and 1.5 million documents couldn't find?

Because of the guidelines and whether they actually do what everyone says they do (and about which there are 3 witnesses who say that Mueller himself said the OLC guidelines didn't affect his determination to not bring charges) and the authorizing statute as well as the appointment letter's terms (plus the second appointment letter from Rosenstein which no one has seen), the final determination was left up to the AG who, along with his assistant AG (you know, the guy who oversaw Mueller's investigation AND who offered to wear a wire to secretly tape Trump in order to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove him), jointly decided that there was insufficient evidence to conclude a crime had been committed.

The investigator and his team of TDS sufferers said there wasn't enough evidence. The investigator's boss looked at the unredacted report and said there isn't enough evidence. The assistant boss who apparently hates Trump also looked at the unredacted report and says there isn't enough evidence.

Please show us where in all of that is the evidence that Trump committed a crime.

The report was reviewed by the the Office of Legal Counsel and a number of staff attorneys as well.
 
Don't you just love to hear these libs taking about the President"s "hand picked" Attorney General? As if there was ever an AG who wasn't chosen by the President.:rolleyes::D

Not to mention that the historic first black president have just happened to pick the historic first black attorney general and the first attorney general who was held in contempt by Congress and replaced by a marvelously coincidental second black attorney general because of course Obama looking at the entire list of possible attorney generals in the entire country could only find qualified applicants who were black. The second black attorney general had to recuse herself for misconduct, which indirectly led to the entire mess we're in now.

Butter that none of that had anything to do with the color of their skin. They are to be celebrated because they were all historic and everything. The content of their collective character doesn't matter at all when skin color is all that matters.
 
But I’m not embarrassed. I’m just fine. The only sputtering rage I see is yours. Stay in your lane, you sound insane.
 
But I’m not embarrassed. I’m just fine. The only sputtering rage I see is yours. Stay in your lane, you sound insane.

Don't you think that you would be better off appending some gifs to that post?

If you're going to borrow everyone's catchphrases you should also nick the illustrations, poser.
 
“Russia, Russia, Russia! That’s all you heard at the beginning of this Witch Hunt Hoax,” the president tweeted. “And now Russia has disappeared because I had nothing to do with Russia helping me to get elected.”

Bwahahahahahaha! :D
 
Racist Que never misses an opportunity to vent his resentment against successful black men.

Not to mention that the historic first black president have just happened to pick the historic first black attorney general and the first attorney general who was held in contempt by Congress and replaced by a marvelously coincidental second black attorney general because of course Obama looking at the entire list of possible attorney generals in the entire country could only find qualified applicants who were black. The second black attorney general had to recuse herself for misconduct, which indirectly led to the entire mess we're in now.

Butter that none of that had anything to do with the color of their skin. They are to be celebrated because they were all historic and everything. The content of their collective character doesn't matter at all when skin color is all that matters.
 
Pretty funny coming from the Self Annointed Smartest Guy in the Room. Did you Google those studies, Einstein?

That would be the big giant head..Don't poke fun at Queball..he's triggered and very sensitive lately. He'll never find his manhood if you pick on him.
 
Racist Queefy thinks any black man appointed to a high level position has his skin color to thank. What’s Queefy’s excuse for never receiving such an appointment?

I wouldn't be opposed to a black AG or even two black AGs appointed by a black President as long as they were outstanding legal minds and not just political ideologues like Holder and Lynch proved to be. Both demonstrated a profound lack of respect for the law. Holder transformed the DOJ into a bastion of radical leftist extremism, and Lynch, who wasn't bound by the policies of her predecessor, continued the corruption.
 
IG cleared him completely, he’s back at a successful law firm. What are you doing?:rolleyes:

Andrew Weissmann has a day job as well, dopey. That doesn't mean he has any integrity. The IG cannot and did not clear him of contempt of congress charges.
 
Back
Top