Trump is finally...

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...ait-hormuz-causing-oil-prices-skyrocket-55092

"But for all of Tehran’s bluster, an outright Iranian closure of the Strait remains highly unlikely. That is because, even though the Iranian regime has the military might to do so (something the U.S. intelligence community has been warning about for years), the strategic consequences would be ruinous for Tehran.

As one military official explained privately a few years ago, “if Iran closes the Strait, it will remain closed.” In other words, such a step would be treated as a casus belli by the U.S. military, which would respond decisively with an open-ended blockade of its own. That would have disastrous consequences for the Iranian regime, which relies on oil exports for more than a third of its federal budget.""

However, when faced with crippling sanctions, why wouldn't they?

Funny you mentioned “crippling sanctions” Russia and North Korea are in the same boat and they aren’t stupid enough to start a war over sanctions that have all but crippled their countries. Iran is just huffing and puffing. Let them blockade that narrow waterway into the Persian Gulf and see what happens. It won’t be WW3, but it sure as Hell isnt going to be pretty.
 
Funny you mentioned “crippling sanctions” Russia and North Korea are in the same boat and they aren’t stupid enough to start a war over sanctions that have all but crippled their countries. Iran is just huffing and puffing. Let them blockade that narrow waterway into the Persian Gulf and see what happens. It won’t be WW3, but it sure as Hell isnt going to be pretty.

I wouldn't put Russia and N Korea in the same category, at all.

If anything N Korea is a puppet state of Russia and China.
 
I wouldn't put Russia and N Korea in the same category, at all.

If anything N Korea is a puppet state of Russia and China.

Puppet state or not, both are suffering from strict sanctions. I read an article about millions starving in North Korea. Russia already has a problem feeding it’s people. WW3 still hasn’t happened because of it.
 
Keep wishing. WW3 isn’t going to be caused by Iran & Trump. My speculation only concerned USA vrs China and Russia. Iran only controls 10% of the world’s oil supply. There isn’t shit else in that country worth starting WW3 over. Iran at best has North Korea and Syria as actual allies.

china won't kill it's biggest consumer base.
russia ain't the ussr.

nothing like a little war v. a built in foe for a little october surprise opened way too early.

the spin is getting serious now....

look at the left hand....
look at the left hand....

nothing nervous about the right one....

see?
i can spin shinola too.
 
Ferd Turgeson for Biden's running mate.

Make America socialist.

You can make hats and shit.
 
1. Have the war hawks located any WMD's yet? :rolleyes:

2. This report originally came from Saudi Arabia- that nation's only foreign policy expertise being the demolition of NY skyscrapers and failing Butchery 101 in their Turkish embassy.

Probably enough for John Bolton but mebbe anybody with half a brain should be cautious.
 
That's why a carrier strike group in en route to the Persian Gulf right now.

Amazing how TDS makes so may people terrorist supporters, EU forget history on appeasing people that have the same goals as Hitler.
 
I’m going to wager America could take both Russia and China on at the same time without nukes and win, but it wouldn’t be a quick war.

Wow. The amount of ignorance in your post is astounding.

Time to put on your big boy panties and go fight..
 
I’m going to wager America could take both Russia and China on at the same time without nukes and win, but it wouldn’t be a quick war.

Are you REALLY that stupid?

The US hasn't won a war since 1945 and we didn't do that without the help of virtually the rest of the world including Russia.

We couldn't even 'win' against Viet Nam or Korea and you think we can 'win' against either Russia OR China let alone both of them?

China's armed forces alone outnumber the population of several major US cities combined. They could win a ground war simply by attrition, basically the way the Russians stopped the German invasion.

.
 
Are you REALLY that stupid?

.

Okay, I’m going to stop you with your lead off question. More than likely you and someone else above have never seen the US military in action on the battlefield in the last 20 - 30 years.

Plus, my comment leads off with the words “I wager”, similar to “I bet”. A speculation type scenario. I also never said anything about “winning” before you jumped the gun with your comment.

Bring all the facts next time. The Gulf War was in 1991, remember? At the time Saddam wielded the 4th largest Army. Russia and China weren’t even a factor.
Russia couldn’t beat Afghanistan. Truman stopped General McAuthor from going into China after the North Koreans and basically fired him. But, we won’t talk about Harry Truman much. Had he not been a pussy and dropped the nuke, there would be a Korea today, not a divided country, considering in 1950 America was probably the only country in the world wielding nukes. I might have to research that it’s bit.
 
Fuck em up...and who else gets involved?

Iran has allies. China and Russia come to mind.

China and Russia are going to cut their gravy train off and start WWIII for a misbehaving 3rd world shit hole?

LOL sure...

Okay, I’m going to stop you with your lead off question. More than likely you and someone else above have never seen the US military in action on the battlefield in the last 20 - 30 years.

JaF0 is a USA hating lunatic who knows nothing of our basic history and government much less our military.
 
Bring all the facts next time. The Gulf War was in 1991, remember? At the time Saddam wielded the 4th largest Army. Russia and China weren’t even a factor.
Russia couldn’t beat Afghanistan. Truman stopped General McAuthor from going into China after the North Koreans and basically fired him. But, we won’t talk about Harry Truman much. Had he not been a pussy and dropped the nuke, there would be a Korea today, not a divided country, considering in 1950 America was probably the only country in the world wielding nukes. I might have to research that it’s bit.

We didn't 'win' in '91. We drove a few tanks out of Kuwait. They basically turned tail and ran, leaving much of their stuff behind, in part because they didn't really didn't want to be there to begin with.

Then we left and the whole place turned into a bigger mess than it was.

We can't beat the Afghans either and we've been there a lot longer, with greater losses. Hell, we couldn't even beat a few tribal gangs in Somalia.

We weren't 'at war' with China and had no legal grounds to invade their territory. If we had, how do you think that would have turned out? Horribly. Millions of losses, many of them ours.

Having the unpleasant distinction of being the only nation to date to unleash nuclear weapons on a non-combatant civilian population once is bad enough. Twice would have been unforgivable.

The best thing to have done in the late 40s would have been to admit the evils of our actions in two Japanese cities and commit to ending all development of nuclear weapons worldwide. The madness of MAD would never have happened.
 
We didn't 'win' in '91. We drove a few tanks out of Kuwait. They basically turned tail and ran,

We can't beat the Afghans either and we've been there a lot longer, with greater losses. Hell, we couldn't even beat a few tribal gangs in Somalia.

We weren't 'at war' with China


jaF0's disconnect from reality deepens and lack of historical knowledge surrounding the Korean and Vietnam conflicts is amusing.

Driving them out of the objective and making them run away is a win.

We beat the Afghans in a matter of days and had a kill ratio in Somalia that is still legend almost 30 years later.

jaF0, why must you be so dishonest???:confused:
 
China and Russia are going to cut their gravy train off and start WWIII for a misbehaving 3rd world shit hole?

LOL sure...



JaF0 is a USA hating lunatic who knows nothing of our basic history and government much less our military.

Anyone who has served in the US Military in the last 25 years or so will defend America’s military capabilities and capacity to wage war on any battlefield, anywhere in the world. But, it’s understandable that Democrats don’t like the military. Clinton and Obama both wanted to downsize the armed forces allowing North Korea and Iran to proceed with their nuclear programs, let NATO fall behind on defense commitments and take more than a decade to track down a known terrorist.
 
With the number of nations involved in the mid-east over the last 20+ years, it could be argued that WWIII has been in progress for that time.

Didn't Japan even send support at one point?
 
With the number of nations involved in the mid-east over the last 20+ years, it could be argued that WWIII has been in progress for that time.

Didn't Japan even send support at one point?

You might need to read up on Japan’s constitution they have in effect that was written following WW2, but we’re talking WW3, not WW2.
 
LOL .....WWIII has bee in progress because of the Middle East...LMFAO!!!!
 
People in the Middle East tote AK-47’s like we carry cell phones. They’ve fought each other since the dawn of time. The only way there’s gonna be peace in the Middle East is when they kill each other.
Maybe then the price of a barrel of oil will bottom out.
 
the reason the US didnt "win" in the way "win" was defined in the past

is because of ROE imposed by Niggers, Bush I, and Nigger Bush II and NIGGER NIGGER

you can be certain there will be one ROE under StrongHorse Trump

JUST WIN BABY!
 
Mueller report = no collusion so what else can the progressives scream about? Oh yeah, Trump's going to put us into a war and millions will DIEEEEEEEE!!!!



The whole thing is totally pathetic.
 
Back
Top