Abortion

Originally Posted by Kantarii View Post
Potential? Seriously? You don’t think a fetus is going to be potentially a dog, a cat, a bird, or a fish when it comes out the womb prematurely, do you? It’s a fetus and if it has a heartbeat, it’s alive, dependent on the mother while she carries it inside her unless you think she’s just carrying around junk to throw in the trash when she decides she doesn’t want it.
*facepalm*

No, you doofus, it's potentially going to be a human ... and just as potentially it isn't going to be a human because of spontaneous miscarriage or abortion or whatever else.
Rob's acorn analogy is pretty sound - it's surprising you can't get that.
An acorn isn't a potential coconut tree, any more than a human embryo isn't a potential fish. That's why we have to put labels on the seeds - so we know what they are potentially going to grow into.
uh huh, and no, maybe not so surprising :rolleyes:

If life begins at conception, shouldn't you lot also be picketing pharmacists who give out the morning after pill?
Does that mean when I took the morning after pill a few months ago, I was killing an unborn baby? (Well, maybe - it wasn't actually that likely that I was pregnant, but even though I'm 52 and effectively single, clearly if I was pregnant, I should have had the baby, because, y'know, the sanctity of life and everything.)
i.u.d's, too since it takes a while for the fertilised egg to travel down to the womb before it can implant and become an embryo.
 
God gave us free will, choices in life.

Just like He gave you a choice to plaster your face with Dollar General Bonne Belle makeup.

Nice try, but I wear Estée Lauder and Chanel makeup. 💋
So I’ll consider the source.
 
Last edited:
Without reading page after page and post after post, is it safe to assume we have more men discussing a medical issue as a philosophical issue?

Just checking, cuz that's the way it usually goes.
 
Without reading page after page and post after post, is it safe to assume we have more men discussing a medical issue as a philosophical issue?

Just checking, cuz that's the way it usually goes.

No basically we all came to the same agreement that we're happy you are barren and have not bred or indoctrinated any children with your psychotic perspective opinions and philosophies.
 
No basically we all came to the same agreement that we're happy you are barren and have not bred or indoctrinated any children with your psychotic perspective opinions and philosophies.

Your daughter is better off without you.
 
Without reading page after page and post after post, is it safe to assume we have more men discussing a medical issue as a philosophical issue?

Just checking, cuz that's the way it usually goes.

Pretty much.

Only new things under the sun is that Matthew Craig REALLY hates people disagreeing with him (about an "8" on the scale of 1-to-Que) and Kantarii for the life of him cannot comprehend the meaning of the word "potential".

Other than that, same old same old.
 
Your daughter is better off without you.

Actually studies have shown the lack of a father in a child's life has huge psychological effects on their development. But this thread is about abortion, or according to adrina, another opportunity to hate men, so please do stay on topic Luk.
 
Pretty much.

Only new things under the sun is that Matthew Craig REALLY hates people disagreeing with him (about an "8" on the scale of 1-to-Que) and Kantarii for the life of him cannot comprehend the meaning of the word "potential".

Other than that, same old same old.

Kinda what I figured from the gist of it.

It's what they do. Oh while also getting self righteous. But hey, it's a thing right.
 
Kinda what I figured from the gist of it.

It's what they do. Oh while also getting self righteous. But hey, it's a thing right.

I wonder when NobDownSyndrome's going to cash in all his cyberpussy points. He must have enough for an entire orgy by now.
 
I wonder when Rob's going to cash in all his cyberpussy points. He must have enough for an entire orgy by now.

You must be seriously bitter and jealous. Even obsessive. You must not be a very happy person. You spend a lot of time obsessing about people you don't even know.

You're weird. And not in a good way.
 
Oh, and he wears Estée Lauder and Chanel makeup instead of the clown makeup from the holloween store.

What does that have to do with Abortion?? Who knows, but an odd development none the less.
 
Pretty much.

Only new things under the sun is that Matthew Craig REALLY hates people disagreeing with him (about an "8" on the scale of 1-to-Que) and Kantarii for the life of him cannot comprehend the meaning of the word "potential".

Other than that, same old same old.


<Snickers>

No one can quite reach Que's level of outrage over disagreement (except if your tits are flat, then he likes you), but this Matthew idiot is getting up there, with an increasingly intense frequency of outbursts.


Yet again, nincompoop blatantly claimed in another thread that he is simply here to trigger the "Left", like who in blazing Jesus would be triggered by some racist, slack-jawed, lowly, methhead, chain smoking trash who is too chickenshit to talk smack in person? Who? Who is he again?

The funny assbackwards part of this entire thing, the neanderthal ends up TRIGGERED HIMSELF. :D:D:D:D:D True trolls keep their cool.

I guess he's still living with the guilt of being a piss poor deadbeat father yet over here chattering about being "pro-life". He has some nerve. He's the LAST person who should be flapping his gums. He's not the one who has to carry it for nine months and he sure ain't the one who is gonna be changing the dirty ass diapers and feeding it.

But...but... WELFARE!

What a dummy. He just doesn't want anymore Aryan babies aborted, is all. These dummies on here are feeling themselves a little too much.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top