SgtSpiderMan
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2003
- Posts
- 27,976
I'm glad Vetteman finally came back. I was getting tired of being accused of being him.
You were only accused of that because you admitted to being Vetteman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm glad Vetteman finally came back. I was getting tired of being accused of being him.
refresh my memory please...
did not "the liar, comey" hold a press conference
some 10 days before the election?
were not the 'lost' emails - amongst other issues -
in the scrutiny of an fbi
under then democrat(ic) stewardship?
the issues, though similar, are still not equivalent.
Even if it is Dems playing politics the institution of Congress still should be respected.
That's how the checks and balances are maintained.
What's at issue is the use of executive privilege.
What is it intended to be used for?
Does Trump's application of it in this case fall under that?
That's the debate here.
I think holding Barr in contempt of congress is arguable.
Mnuchin on the other hand is much more of a clear case of contempt of Congress for not providing the tax returns he's clearly bound by law to provide.
Yes, because they were chatting up the meddling Russians.(edited)
Trump's campaign was being surveilled in early 2016.
Yes, because they were chatting up the meddling Russians.
The NSA was doing its job, and Trump campaigners were breaking laws.
Yes, because they were chatting up the meddling Russians.
The NSA was doing its job, and Trump campaigners were breaking laws.
You are wrong and disingenuous, as usual.![]()
It’s on video, schmuckly.
Documents? Like say, the Epoch Times or the Washington Examiner?You don't have a clue what I'm talking about, Chumley. You haven't read the documents I have, so no need for you to chime in. Just be patient for a couple of weeks or so and I'll PM you and tell you when to turn on the TV in the solarium at your retirement home.![]()
Documents? Like say, the Epoch Times or the Washington Examiner?
what is a constitutional crisis?
is this one?
I already answered that earlier. No, it's a constitutional exercise. The constitutional crisis occurred when the un-elected bureaucrats at the FBI, CIA, NSA, and DOJ, broke the law, perpetrated a fraud n the FISC, and tried to intervene in an American presidential campaign.
I wonder what would have happened if all this effort to throw the election was directed to H Clinton. Her losing was a perfect example of how poor a candidate she was. She wasn't interested in being president of all Americans, just the ones who could help her win. Imagine if she lobbied the basket of deplorables.
what about some critical thought,
instead of wallpaper,
vetteguide?
what is a constitutional crisis?
is this one?
I went back and re-read some of your responses to the replies you got to this question.
One thing stood out - you don't accept as fact some of the evidence which has come to light. This results in your question remaining unanswered because you won't accept the answer.
It has become, in essence, you continuing to spin the existing false narrative because you will not accept the truth. The FBI began investigating Trump based on a hoax. They went full retard and started manufacturing evidence to support the hoax, either knowing it was a hoax or by being too stupid to figure it out, to support their preferred political agenda.
It was a lie. Either the FBI was complicit in the lie (this) or they were so incompetent that they should be disbanded by Congress and EVERY FUCKING ONE OF THEM fired without benefits. (this too)
Yet here you are still in the batter's box after the game ended because you refuse to accept that the other team won.
I already answered that earlier. No, it's a constitutional exercise. The constitutional crisis occurred when the un-elected bureaucrats at the FBI, CIA, NSA, and DOJ, broke the law, perpetrated a fraud n the FISC, and tried to intervene in an American presidential campaign.
this is...
simple.
i have no intention to win an argument here, vette.
but some critical thought...
something other than simple proclamation is required.
if there were excesses, it will come out.
but there is fact involved.
russians were diddling with the 2016 preelection/election process.
the nature of which was clearly subject to investigation - and if possible, mitigation.
candidate trump was involved in russia. he does not deny this.
the nature of that connection was a natural tract to be investigated.
if you need heads on pikes, there are plenty of sharpened sticks about...
and plenty of angry peasants of differing minds on the issues at hand.
the govt. is at a standstill over ego and interpretation and bad faith
and...
over angry proclamations that preclude reason.
Just look at how trump has acted on this issue for 2 years. Does he really sound like someone that's guilty of nothing?