There was NO Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

Perhaps you should start learning the English language. The report explicitly states Russia did interfere in the election. Here are the exact words:

The Special Counsel's investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States designed to sow social discord, eventually with the aim of interfering with the election.​

Also, Russia committed criminal acts in perpetration of this interference.

Get over it. Russia interfered and the uneducateds were too stupid to realize it. They were so intent on not electing a liberal Democrat from New York they went and elected a liberal Democrat from New York.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/03/24/mueller-report-read-william-barr-summary-of-russia-investigation/3255076002/
yeah, some WEBSITE had all that influence?

unlike a BILLION specnt by CuntClinton

STFU WITH THAT SHIT!
 
The Russians have been trying to get back in the game since Reagan bitchslapped them back to a third world country. :)
 
It's impressive that you're still able to carry goalposts at your advanced age, Gramps.

He's not moving the goalpost he just understands what "interfering in an election" means.

And exposing a candidate for the piece of shit they are doesn't qualify and neither do anti-Hillary memes in social media. Russian troll farm or not.

The election is the act of everyone going and voting then counting the results. Not the campaigns of the candidates, not what people say about them on social media or any of the other shit the left attempts to conflate with being the election for the sake of the Russiagate conspiracy. They are serpent things.

So if Russia didn't fuck with the vote count, ballots, hack the voting machines, intimidate/suppress voters at the polls or otherwise fuck with the voting/vote counting process? They didn't interfere in the election.
 
Last edited:
I think people forget that the Russians also hacked the GOP, State and local electoral boards, took info including social security numbers of over 500k people from a voter registration database, hacked county office, targeted 21 states election systems and targeted Florida county administrators with malware through a company they hacked that sells voter registration software. Etc, etc.

I believe (I could be wrong) that all of the places the Russians "hacked" were D controlled.

Kinda makes you wonder why some people want to elect more D's into political office where they can "control" more cities and States.
 
He's not moving the goalpost he just understands what "interfering in an election" means.

And exposing a candidate for the piece of shit they are doesn't qualify and neither do anti-Hillary memes in social media. Russian troll farm or not.

The election is the act of everyone going and voting then counting the results. Not the campaigns of the candidates, not what people say about them on social media or any of the other shit the left attempts to conflate with being the election for the sake of the Russiagate conspiracy. They are serpent things.

So if Russia didn't fuck with the vote count, ballots, hack the voting machines, intimidate/suppress voters at the polls or otherwise fuck with the voting/vote counting process? They didn't interfere in the election.

Here's an understanding of foreign electoral intervention, i.e. interfering with an election.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention

Here is the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election(s), also noted by Aglaopheme.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

What is referred to as an election by the term "election interference" has a broader scope than the mere act of filling out and submitting a ballot. To pretend otherwise, as Franziasaurus does, is to move the goalposts. ;)
 
Here's an understanding of foreign electoral intervention, i.e. interfering with an election.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention

Here is the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election(s), also noted by Aglaopheme.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

What is referred to as an election by the term "election interference" has a broader scope than the mere act of filling out and submitting a ballot. To pretend otherwise, as Franziasaurus does, is to move the goalposts. ;)

You wouldn't know a goal post if it jumped up and hit you!

Remember those goal posts at that HS in that town named after cedar trees?
 
Here's an understanding of foreign electoral intervention, i.e. interfering with an election.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention

Here is the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election(s), also noted by Aglaopheme.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

What is referred to as an election by the term "election interference" has a broader scope than the mere act of filling out and submitting a ballot. To pretend otherwise, as Franziasaurus does, is to move the goalposts. ;)

They just keep repeating the lie.

It's the alternate facts of the right.

Oceania has always been at war with Eurasia.
 
I believe (I could be wrong) that all of the places the Russians "hacked" were D controlled.

Kinda makes you wonder why some people want to elect more D's into political office where they can "control" more cities and States.

You would be incorrect, as I stated earlier in this thread. Feel free to look up how the GOP was hacked, and to not glance over all of the state and local hacks.


No one is saying the Russians physically changed a vote, but there is a reason we have a multi billion dollar advertising industry here. It’s not because ads have zero influence on people.
 
Here's an understanding of foreign electoral intervention, i.e. interfering with an election.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_electoral_intervention

Here is the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election(s), also noted by Aglaopheme.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_interference_in_the_2016_United_States_elections

Yea we all know the russiagate conspiracy shpeel.

What is referred to as an election by the term "election interference" has a broader scope than the mere act of filling out and submitting a ballot. To pretend otherwise, as Franziasaurus does, is to move the goalposts. ;)

Only in the Rachel Maddow/Alex Jones world and no it's not.

It's being accurate about what an election is and not letting the conspiracy theorist run around pretending otherwise to suit their paranoid delusions. ;)

It's right in there with calling things that aren't privileges of any kind much less racial ones a "white" privilege......it's total buuu shit.
 
Depends on how big your dick is. :kiss:

Aww man. I don't float my boat that way. I'm flattered and all that. But I'm a heterosexual. Though I have no homophobia, how about we meet somewhere within driving distance of your area?

Like Johnny's Bar (great kewlaide and coffee) in Tallapoosa or somewhere in Cedartown? Maybe at the nearest Burger King next to THE airport?

I'll bring my hawt new girlfriend and you bring your sister? They knew each other many years ago and really have some catching up to do.
 
See, Bot and ish know better than Republican and Democrats alike not to mention every single intelligence agency.
 
No one is saying the Russians physically changed a vote,

Right, the election itself was not interfered with.

but there is a reason we have a multi billion dollar advertising industry here. It’s not because ads have zero influence on people.

Right, that's protected free speech too.

Not interfering with an election.

If you can't pitch a better sale than what T-dawg is offering?

If exposing your candidates secrets makes them so detestable folks are turning to Trump as the alternative??

Then maybe...just MAYBE D'z might want to re-evaluate their candidates and the politics they are trying to sell.

MAYBE the (D)'z need to ask "holy fuck why couldn't we get white women to vote for our white girl over Mr."Grab em by the pussy"??"



BUT OH NO....no no no no...ethno-socialism and totalitarian eco-communism is just so wonderful only a Nazi would be opposed right? Clearly...there is no need for any good comrades to re-evaluate their positions or the politicians they are trying to sell to the voters that you need in those horrible white dumbfuckistan states (D)'s take every opportunity they can to berate, deride, look down your noses at and shit all over.

Maybe the (D) for 2020 will be even more explicit in their hatred for everything about the political values the USA was founded on but most of all, the white male Nazis and their minority pets who promote terrible racist and misogynistic ideas like individual rights, pursuing ones happiness, life and liberty.
 
Last edited:
'Manipulate public opinion...'

I'm not convinced there is a single shred of evidence that 'the Russians' had Hillary's email archives and leaked these anywhere.

But nevertheless if that is the contention, does this class as 'manipulating public opinion?' What those emails showed FACTUALLY, was that Hillary Clinton was a criminal and a HUGE liar and a fraud in spades. She took two hundred million dollars from Muslims in Morocco and 'suddenly' a Pakistani spy Imran Arwan had open access to all the communications of the US Secretary of State!!

Leaking the emails is 'manipulating public opinion...' There was no disinformation involved there - the leaked emails were real; that is, they were exact digital instances of her real emails. 'Disinformation?' 'Manipulation?'

Okay. If that's what people want to believe... Who am I to stop them? Not a Russian, that's for sure.

Perhaps people just want to be treated like the mushrooms that they apparently are so happy being - kept in the dark and fed on BS and thus, 'not(?)' manipulated...?
Hillary's emails were never leaked, you fucking retard.
 
You would be incorrect, as I stated earlier in this thread. Feel free to look up how the GOP was hacked, and to not glance over all of the state and local hacks.


No one is saying the Russians physically changed a vote, but there is a reason we have a multi billion dollar advertising industry here. It’s not because ads have zero influence on people.

. . .and to have had any meaningful effect the Rooskies would have to have been the most effective campaign strategists in the history of the world to move the needle at all on a shoestring budget against the gazillion dollars that HRC wasted trying to persuade voters she is not HRC.

Advertising cannot move a toxic product.

You lost when you coronated her.
 
Excuse my ignorance in white people affairs, but who is Hillary? The former Secretary of State? Yesterday's news?
 
Oh, look! Boof thinks directly addressing her contention that "advertising works" because "multi-billion dollar industry" is "moving the goalposts."

Boof really needs to pay more attention before erupting with one of his limited number of stock retorts
 
Yea we all know the russiagate conspiracy shpeel.



Only in the Rachel Maddow/Alex Jones world and no it's not.

It's being accurate about what an election is and not letting the conspiracy theorist run around pretending otherwise to suit their paranoid delusions. ;)

It's right in there with calling things that aren't privileges of any kind much less racial ones a "white" privilege......it's total buuu shit.

The media and other outlets persist with the 'interference' meme because it suits their political agenda and the fact that they know a great many people are stupid enough to buy it.

Advertising is NOT interference. It's an attempt to influence the individual to buy something, or in some case not buy something. It in no way 'interferes' with your plans or activities.
 
Back
Top