Why The DNC Was Not Hacked By The Russians

[bigsly]

By William Binney, former Technical Director NSA and Larry Johnson, former State CT and CIA

Opening paragraph:

The FBI, CIA and NSA claim that the DNC emails published by WIKILEAKS on July 22, 2016 were obtained via a Russian hack, but more than three years after the alleged “hack” no forensic evidence has been produced to support that claim. In fact, the available forensic evidence contradicts the official account that blames the leak of the DNC emails on a Russian internet “intrusion”. The existing evidence supports an alternative explanation--the files taken from the DNC between 23 and 25May 2016 and were copied onto a file storage device, such as a thumb drive.

Closing paragraph:

Taken together, these disparate data points combine to paint a picture that exonerates alleged Russian hackers and implicates persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community taking part in a campaign of misinformation, deceit and incompetence. It is not a pretty picture.

https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic...y-the-dnc-was-not-hacked-by-the-russians.html


"persons within our law enforcement and intelligence community" treasonously exercising classical Marxism:

Accuse Your Enemy Of What You Are Doing, As You Are Doing It To Create Confusion

 

[BoyNextDoor]

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

Opening three paragraphs:

On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening,” he said at a news conference at one of his resorts, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”

That same day, July 27, several Russian government hackers launched an attack against the email accounts of staffers in Clinton’s personal office, according to a sweeping indictment Friday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. At or around the same time, the hackers also targeted 76 email addresses used by the Clinton campaign, investigators said.


Paragraph 6:
It includes details on how the Russians, using an encrypted file with instructions, delivered their trove of hacked emails to WikiLeaks, the online anti-secrecy organization led by Julian Assange that became the main platform for the Russians to display their trove of hacked emails.


Closing Paragraph:

On July 22, three days before the Democratic National Convention opened, WikiLeaks put up the DNC email archive of more than 20,000 emails and other documents hacked by the GRU, the indictment said.


"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man."

JFK

 

[bbx56]

the DNC refused to hand the server to the FBI to investigate

why?

as such, no one knows who hacked it

 

[bigsly]

If only Seth Rich could talk.

 

[Wrong Element]

Accuse Your Enemy Of What You Are Doing, As You Are Doing It To Create Confusion

This is really funny, but I'm pretty sure you don't understand why.

 

[bbx56]

If only Seth Rich could talk.

he was killed

the police called it a robbery

NOTHING was stolen

he was shot twice

back of head

 

[BoyNextDoor]

If only Seth Rich could talk.

If he could he would sue Hannity and Fox as well.

 

[bbx56]

he cant

he is dead

killed by DUMZ

 

[texasj65]

On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

Do you think that was a call to arms for a foreign government to commit electronic espionage against the United states? Maybe it's a brash way for a yankee to point out the absurdity of HRC wiping out 30000 subpoenaed emails and our government officials giving her a free pass.

Has anyone ever denied what was in the emails? So the dems are mad that they have been exposed.

The rabid frenzy of the left would be sad if it wasn't so comical.

 

[SpeareChucker]

Honestly I'm going with old Occam here.

It is pretty much the easiest explanation that it was some sort of inside job
perpetrated by someone with an axe to grind.

It is a lesson in power...

 

[bbx56]

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

Opening three paragraphs:

On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening,” he said at a news conference at one of his resorts, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”

That same day, July 27, several Russian government hackers launched an attack against the email accounts of staffers in Clinton’s personal office, according to a sweeping indictment Friday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. At or around the same time, the hackers also targeted 76 email addresses used by the Clinton campaign, investigators said.


Paragraph 6:
It includes details on how the Russians, using an encrypted file with instructions, delivered their trove of hacked emails to WikiLeaks, the online anti-secrecy organization led by Julian Assange that became the main platform for the Russians to display their trove of hacked emails.


Closing Paragraph:

On July 22, three days before the Democratic National Convention opened, WikiLeaks put up the DNC email archive of more than 20,000 emails and other documents hacked by the GRU, the indictment said.


"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man."

JFK

wow

Trump said DO IT

and they DID it in a few days


Only a NIGGER believes this shit

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Do you think that was a call to arms for a foreign government to commit electronic espionage against the United states? Maybe it's a brash way for a yankee to point out the absurdity of HRC wiping out 30000 subpoenaed emails and our government officials giving her a free pass.

Has anyone ever denied what was in the emails? So the dems are mad that they have been exposed.

The rabid frenzy of the left would be sad if it wasn't so comical.

I saw a candidate ask a foreign, adversarial power to interfere in our elections. What did you see?

BTW - it was a crime.

Aslo- the emails were not under subpoena.

The truth will set you free.

 

[SpeareChucker]

*chuckle*


"The press takes him literally, but not seriously; his supporters take him seriously, but not literally."
Salena Zito.


So, there was zero chance that he was just cracking wise?

 

[bbx56]

I saw a candidate ask a foreign, adversarial power to interfere in our elections. What did you see?

BTW - it was a crime.

Aslo- the emails were not under subpoena.

The truth will set you free.

so lets see if we have this right

Trump WANTS the emails OUT

so instead of cmmunicating that in a ot way that NO ONE KNOWS about

he says it on LIVE TV


STFU, NIGGER BUM NEXT DOOR, you sound worse then a NIGGER


Is that the idea?

 

[bellisarius]

How the Russians hacked the DNC and passed its emails to WikiLeaks

Opening three paragraphs:

On a late July day in 2016, Donald Trump, the GOP nominee for president, stood at a lectern in Florida, next to an American flag, and urged a U.S. adversary to become involved in the election campaign and find tens of thousands of emails wiped from the server of his Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton.

“Russia, if you’re listening,” he said at a news conference at one of his resorts, “I hope you’re able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing.”

That same day, July 27, several Russian government hackers launched an attack against the email accounts of staffers in Clinton’s personal office, according to a sweeping indictment Friday by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III. At or around the same time, the hackers also targeted 76 email addresses used by the Clinton campaign, investigators said.


Paragraph 6:
It includes details on how the Russians, using an encrypted file with instructions, delivered their trove of hacked emails to WikiLeaks, the online anti-secrecy organization led by Julian Assange that became the main platform for the Russians to display their trove of hacked emails.


Closing Paragraph:

On July 22, three days before the Democratic National Convention opened, WikiLeaks put up the DNC email archive of more than 20,000 emails and other documents hacked by the GRU, the indictment said.


"And so, my fellow Americans: ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world: ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man."

JFK

Still an idiot after all these years.

 

[bbx56]

has ANYONE ever been able to answer a simple question

the SERVER was NEVER examined by the FBI or Intel....how does ANYONE know who hacked?

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Still an idiot after all these years.

When they resort to name calling you know they have lost the argument.

 

[bbx56]

When they resort to name calling you know they have lost the argument.

when you resort to FICTION and present it as fact

You are a MOFO NIGGER BUM NEXT DOOR

 

[Rokk0n]

has ANYONE ever been able to answer a simple question

the SERVER was NEVER examined by the FBI or Intel....how does ANYONE know who hacked?

The FBI never seized the actual server because the DNC gave them a copy of the server. There is no evidence that the FBI needed to examine the original server after they had examined the copy. - Politifact.com

 

[bbx56]

that isnt true

the FBI axed for it

the DNC said NO

the DNC sent it to another place that was started by A RUSSIAN and he "examined" it and said RUSSIA


so what "you" are saying is that A FAKE is the SAME as teh REAL and ORIGINAL

STFU, NIGGER

 

[Rokk0n]

The FBI never seized the actual server because the DNC gave them a copy of the server. There is no evidence that the FBI needed to examine the original server after they had examined the copy. - Politifact.com

that isnt true

the FBI axed for it

the DNC said NO

the DNC sent it to another place that was started by A RUSSIAN and he "examined" it and said RUSSIA


so what "you" are saying is that A FAKE is the SAME as teh REAL and ORIGINAL


STFU, NIGGER

That is because the FBI did not need the original server after they examined the copy. Like I said, they did not ask for it after they got the copy.


Once in a while but not often, you post something worthwhile. This is not one.

 

[bellisarius]

That is because the FBI did not need the original server after they examined the copy. Like I said, they did not ask for it after they got the copy.


Once in a while but not often, you post something worthwhile. This is not one.

Damn but you're dense. Having a copy of the server proves nothing. Did the Russians hack the server? No doubt about that in the least. They're going to hack anything they can get into, just like we do.

The issue ISN'T who hacked the server, it's who provided that info to Wikileaks. Proving the Russians (if it can be proven) hacked the server is one thing, proving they gave those emails to Wikileaks is quite another.

Assange has steadfastly stated that those emails DID NOT come from the Russians and that he can prove it. Why is it no one seems to be interested in taking him up on that?

 

[Rokk0n]

Damn but you're dense. Having a copy of the server proves nothing. Did the Russians hack the server? No doubt about that in the least. They're going to hack anything they can get into, just like we do.

The issue ISN'T who hacked the server, it's who provided that info to Wikileaks. Proving the Russians (if it can be proven) hacked the server is one thing, proving they gave those emails to Wikileaks is quite another.

Assange has steadfastly stated that those emails DID NOT come from the Russians and that he can prove it. Why is it no one seems to be interested in taking him up on that?

I said that the FBI did not ask for the server after they got the copy.
That is all.

The other matters I said nothing about.

 

[bigsly]

I know of no human alive whose legendary logical and unbiased analysis on such an issue I'd consider more seriously than William Binney.

 

[Que]

I know of no human alive whose legendary logical and unbiased analysis on such an issue I'd consider more seriously than William Binney.

not even BoyNextDoor?