Some Questions On The Flynn Affair

"Trump’s recent attack on Obama completes a classic story arc. Trump’s political career began with conspiracy-theory attacks on Obama. Trump’s “birtherism” theory was that Obama was born not in America but in Africa, and thus was ineligible to be president. After four years of promises to his base that have ended up in chaos, now characterized by death and unemployment, Trump has returned to where he began, with a conspiracy-theory attack on Obama.

In literature, that narrative arc—the return to the beginning—means the story is nearing its end."

Bullshit aside:

Let us not forget the "birthism" narrative originated in the Hillary Clinton campaign.:rolleyes:
 
That's strange, I can't seem to find a linky to the Schiffty Schiff memo anywhere in your post.

Did you forget to include one?

Reichguide asked for a cite of Nunes' lies. I provided several.

Please try to keep up.... never mind, you're just going to have to repeat 4th grade. Again.
 
Bullshit aside:

Let us not forget the "birthism" narrative originated in the Hillary Clinton campaign.:rolleyes:

*birtherism

Birtherism was a Hillary misstep for sure but then when you nitwits ran with it, you lost all respect from true American patriots.
 
Reichguide asked for a cite of Nunes' lies. I provided several.

Please try to keep up.... never mind, you're just going to have to repeat 4th grade. Again.

With his dementia, it's like he never left.
 
Fuck that. Explain the lies, you can't. Unlike Shiff's, there are none in the Nunes Report.:rolleyes:

The lies are right there, he even refused to respond. You think Trump is a good President, so I’ll make better use of my time and let you live in your fantasy world.
 
The lies are right there, he even refused to respond. You think Trump is a good President, so I’ll make better use of my time and let you live in your fantasy world.

My challenge has nothing to do with Donald Trump. You lied when you said Nunes lies, but can't produce a single example of a lie in the Nunes Report. Not one. You're a phony.
 
Andy McCarthy: Missing Flynn 302 case report could have 'many iterations,' not necessarily representative of Flynn's statements
By Julia Musto | Fox News

The FBI's “302” case report of the investigation into former Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn has likely been heavily edited and there may be many iterations of it, National Review columnist and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy said Saturday.

Appearing on "Fox & Friends Weekend" with hosts Griff Jenkins, Pete Hegseth, and Jedediah Bila, McCarthy explained that 302s -- the bureau's report of an interview -- follow an archaic practice that "really lends itself to manipulation and worse."

"So, they looked at [it] and somebody wrote it and they said, 'Gee, we don't like how that came out.' So, one guy edits it and then the next person -- Lisa Page says to Strzok: 'What a piece of garbage you gave me.' And, Strzok says to her, 'You've seen it when I got it,'" he continued. "So, you know, who knows how many iterations there are of this thing?"

"But, whether it's representative of what Flynn said by the end is questionable," he told Hegseth. "And then, the other thing, Pete, that you have to bear in mind is the agents who interviewed him didn't think he lied. So, that's like the cherry on top."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/andy-mccarthy-flynn-302-report
 
Andy McCarthy: Missing Flynn 302 case report could have 'many iterations,' not necessarily representative of Flynn's statements
By Julia Musto | Fox News

The FBI's “302” case report of the investigation into former Trump national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn has likely been heavily edited and there may be many iterations of it, National Review columnist and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andy McCarthy said Saturday.

Appearing on "Fox & Friends Weekend" with hosts Griff Jenkins, Pete Hegseth, and Jedediah Bila, McCarthy explained that 302s -- the bureau's report of an interview -- follow an archaic practice that "really lends itself to manipulation and worse."

"So, they looked at [it] and somebody wrote it and they said, 'Gee, we don't like how that came out.' So, one guy edits it and then the next person -- Lisa Page says to Strzok: 'What a piece of garbage you gave me.' And, Strzok says to her, 'You've seen it when I got it,'" he continued. "So, you know, who knows how many iterations there are of this thing?"

"But, whether it's representative of what Flynn said by the end is questionable," he told Hegseth. "And then, the other thing, Pete, that you have to bear in mind is the agents who interviewed him didn't think he lied. So, that's like the cherry on top."

https://www.foxnews.com/media/andy-mccarthy-flynn-302-report

Why do you post such utter crap? Could have. Likely. There may be. Somebody. One guy. The next person. Whether it’s.

This is below even your already low standards for reportage.
 
My challenge has nothing to do with Donald Trump. You lied when you said Nunes lies, but can't produce a single example of a lie in the Nunes Report. Not one. You're a phony.

Your "challenge" ( :rolleyes: ) was answered in full.

So show me those lies.


Reichguide asked for a cite of Nunes' lies. I provided several.

Please try to keep up.... never mind, you're just going to have to repeat 4th grade. Again.

*birtherism

Birtherism was a Hillary misstep for sure but then when you nitwits ran with it, you lost all respect from true American patriots.

My challenge has nothing to do with Donald Trump. You lied when you said Nunes lies, but can't produce a single example of a lie in the Nunes Report. Not one. You're a phony.

Did you somehow manage to miss all of this?
 
Why do you post such utter crap? Could have. Likely. There may be. Somebody. One guy. The next person. Whether it’s.

This is below even your already low standards for reportage.

You know who McCarthy is, right?
 
The government claims they were worried about a phone call made between Flynn and the Russian Ambassador, right? Well looking at the declassified list of names unmasking Flynn one can't find an unmasking request made on the day of the call, December 29, 2016. There's all kinds of requests but not on that day...why? How could the government know about the call if it wasn't monitored and transcribed? How was it transferred, by word of mouth, who knows? Where are the transcripts of the call? Well take a look at this on page 213 of the now declassified Andrew McCabe interview transcript. The conversation is about that transcript, check out McCabe's answer:

Looks like Andy McCarthy have found what I posted about above:

Andrew McCarthy: Obamagate – Was Flynn identity unmasked or never masked in call with Russian ambassador?
Andrew McCarthy
By Andrew McCarthy | National Review

"I suspect that’s because Lt. Gen. Flynn’s identity was not “masked” in the first place. Instead, his Dec. 29, 2016 call with Kislyak was likely intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community."

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...-never-masked-in-call-with-russian-ambassador
 
Looks like Andy McCarthy have found what I posted about above:

Andrew McCarthy: Obamagate – Was Flynn identity unmasked or never masked in call with Russian ambassador?
Andrew McCarthy
By Andrew McCarthy | National Review

"I suspect that’s because Lt. Gen. Flynn’s identity was not “masked” in the first place. Instead, his Dec. 29, 2016 call with Kislyak was likely intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community."

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...-never-masked-in-call-with-russian-ambassador

1. there is no "obmagate"
2. it's an op-ed piece from party troll
3. it's an op-ed piece from a party troll on foxnews

3 strikes and yer out!
 
Looks like Andy McCarthy have found what I posted about above:

Andrew McCarthy: Obamagate – Was Flynn identity unmasked or never masked in call with Russian ambassador?
Andrew McCarthy
By Andrew McCarthy | National Review

"I suspect that’s because Lt. Gen. Flynn’s identity was not “masked” in the first place. Instead, his Dec. 29, 2016 call with Kislyak was likely intercepted under an intelligence program not subject to the masking rules, probably by the CIA or a friendly foreign spy service acting in a nod-and-wink arrangement with our intelligence community."

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/and...-never-masked-in-call-with-russian-ambassador

1. there is no "obmagate"
2. it's an op-ed piece from party troll
3. it's an op-ed piece from a party troll on foxnews

3 strikes and yer out!

https://i.gifer.com/Q7gT.gif
 
I have a question about the Flynn Affair

how is that confessing to commiting crimes makes you a hero?
 
Back
Top