Is it unfair to bully Donald Trump?

She loves to attack you with irrelevant metrics. Maybe it comes out of a willful ignorance that the popular vote doesn't matter in a Presidential election.

Do you understand the difference between systems and people?

The system is not what has a problem with Donald. It is the people. The majority of people who did not vote for him. It's like you think that just because it was an EC victory that it wipes out that reality.

:rolleyes:
 
Do you understand the difference between systems and people?

The system is not what has a problem with Donald. It is the people. The majority of people who did not vote for him. It's like you think that just because it was an EC victory that it wipes out that reality.

:rolleyes:

Actually, it does.

The purpose of the EC is to specifically prevent what you want to happen, from happening.

You can bitch, moan, wail, and grind your teeth all you want, but the REALITY is, Trump is President because our electoral system is specifically set up the way it is. Anything to the contrary is just whining from sore luzers.
 
She loves to attack you with irrelevant metrics. Maybe it comes out of a willful ignorance that the popular vote doesn't matter in a Presidential election.
The popular vote determines who the electors are, so it does matter. Some votes are worth more than others, depending on the state.

Actually, it does.

The purpose of the EC is to specifically prevent what you want to happen, from happening.

You can bitch, moan, wail, and grind your teeth all you want, but the REALITY is, Trump is President because our electoral system is specifically set up the way it is. Anything to the contrary is just whining from sore luzers.
The original setup of the EC was to have the state legislatures appoint electors, not the voters. It took several decades to settle on the setup we have today. Changes were made because of unintended consequences in the past, and thanks to Trump, more changes could be on the way.

Maybe you should take a civics class.
 
The popular vote determines who the electors are, so it does matter. Some votes are worth more than others, depending on the state.

The original setup of the EC was to have the state legislatures appoint electors, not the voters. It took several decades to settle on the setup we have today. Changes were made because of unintended consequences in the past, and thanks to Trump, more changes could be on the way.

Maybe you should take a civics class.


GOFUCKYOURSELF
 
Actually, it does.

The purpose of the EC is to specifically prevent what you want to happen, from happening.

You can bitch, moan, wail, and grind your teeth all you want, but the REALITY is, Trump is President because our electoral system is specifically set up the way it is. Anything to the contrary is just whining from sore luzers.

Thank you for dismissing and denigrating over half of the American voters.

And you wonder why you are called Deplorables. :rolleyes:
 
Actually, it does.

The purpose of the EC is to specifically prevent what you want to happen, from happening.

You can bitch, moan, wail, and grind your teeth all you want, but the REALITY is, Trump is President because our electoral system is specifically set up the way it is. Anything to the contrary is just whining from sore luzers.

She'd be happy if New York and Los Angeles determined who went to the white House.
 
Seems to me that anyone who criticizes him on any of these topics is a few decades late to the party. You’re wasting your breath. You got what you elected, exactly as he promised.

Only if you voted for him. The fact is that most voters didn't vote for him.
 
The US got what it deserved, thanks in large part to 100,000,000 lazy fucks who could not get off their couches and find a voting machine. And enjoy your national emergency deplorables, I’m sure you’ll just love the first one declared by the next Democratic President.
 
I think it's both, at least from the perspective that he doesn't mask his true nature the way career politicians do.

How tall is he? Not the claimed 6 foot 3, right? What color is his hair actually? Why does he wear a tie six inches longer than the norm? Where does that tanned skin come from? You want to reconsider that "his true nature" crap?
 
Thank you for dismissing and denigrating over half of the American voters.

And you wonder why you are called Deplorables. :rolleyes:

Do you even listen to yourself?

Voters in EVERY election lose when their candidates don't win office. That doesn't mean they've been "dismissed'. It means their preferred candidate lost. Their votes still counted. Their voices were heard. They just didn't win the election because rules.

What you want is to say that because your preferred candidate lost, somehow that's an affront and an attack on you personally by the winning candidate's supporters.

Which is pure bullshit. This isn't about YOU at all. You voted, your candidate lost. Whining about it afterwards doesn't change that. Nor does it make you, or anyone else no matter how numerous the group, a victim.
 
Only if you voted for him. The fact is that most voters didn't vote for him.

Wrong.

304 "voters" in the EC voted for Trump.
227 "voters" in the EC voted for Hillary.


Thus the only "voters" which mattered DID "vote for him".
 
How tall is he? Not the claimed 6 foot 3, right? What color is his hair actually? Why does he wear a tie six inches longer than the norm? Where does that tanned skin come from? You want to reconsider that "his true nature" crap?

Each of your examples are things people have known about him for decades, which is further proof that the American Voter knew exactly what they were getting when they elected him.

If you don't like him, you'll be out knocking on doors for your Democrat or Independent candidates next time.

Until then, you're just embarrassing yourself whining about this stuff, don't you think?
 
Not how, but why:

He did not win a majority, or even a plurality, of votes. Most voters did not choose Trump.

First of all the majority of Americans barely voted. Secondly of those that bothered to vote the majority of those did not vote for Hillary either. If the popular vote mattered you have no idea who might have showed up to vote who did not vote because their vote did not matter. Especially in States like California.

Let me repeat that Hillary Clinton was not selected by the majority of American voters.

Was there a meaningful point in what you posted?

he "lost" the meaningless pop vote by 3 million

he lost CA by 4.5 million

That says it all

Well that's not quite "all." Don't forget there are also four million undocumented potential Democray voters in motor-voter California.
 
Maybe the angry ones should be like Venezuela and "recognize" Nancy Pelosi as the Real President.
 
She certainly acts more like a real president.

"Acts like" being the operative words here.

From saying she's equal to the President, to having a signing photo op of the recent appropriations bill, she ACTS like she thinks she's the President.

There's only 1 thing wrong with the whole charade.

She isn't.
 
True, but she’s smarter, tougher, and way more skilled at her job.
 
That slim majority came from California. Correct me if I'm wrong, but California gets more EC votes than any other state. Is it your contention that they got short-changed?


So, I guess by attacking me, you are saying that it it is okay to bully TRUMP and anyone who doesn't hate him too...

You are one stupid prairee nigger! Always a victim!
 
Back
Top