But Her E-mails!

[BotanyBoy]

it's not "different".

Yes it is, a presumption of innocence is not the same as saying you know all the details of what happened.

I noticed you didnt' produce anything to back up the lefts assumptions of guilt.

There was a time when you weren't a troll for the Pubs. You were always dumb but not a troll.
Sad to see them fall like that.

How am I trolling for the pubs???

By not being a fucking moron NPC lefty???

Trashing NPC leftist for being fucking morons isn't trolling for the pubs....it's trolling for everyone right of socialistic authoritarian degenerates.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Awesome. You're now officially on record saying "It has to be the exact same thing or there's no hypocrisy."

You making up shit isn't me downing in my own BS.

You need to lean how to read or stop lying.



Nah I just hate people and always have.

And there is no hypocrisy for the same reasons I laid out to AA and your other partisan hack buddies.

You can keep ignoring those major difference, please do, it makes laughing at you for being an idiot all the easier.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Awesome. You're now officially on record saying "It has to be the exact same thing or there's no hypocrisy."

Really? And where did I say that?


Quote plz....an actual one from me, not one you make up because you're dishonest.

Oh look, you still can't read can you???

 

[schism666]

Really? And where did I say that?


Quote plz....

Oh look, you still can't read can you???

what's the "major difference" in the two? one, the offender has never been charged and the other, we don't know the nature of the emails. you don't know shit so quit pretending that you do.

 

[BotanyBoy]

what's the "major difference" in the two?

The major differences are the felonies. Had Clinton been a poor nobody she'd at least had to have stood trial, and if the FBI had what they said they did she'd almost certainly be doing a 260 year bid in Leavenworth.

It's about the rule of law and Clinton being so obviously above the rule of law. That was the major beef....that is why "Lock her up" became a thing for everyone who had the IQ to realize they had just witness the most blatant in your face elitism in US history.

So if you want to stick (R)'s with hypocrisy on this case you're going to have to watch them let a high level (R) the FBI says they caught committing crimes, crimes we lock regular people up for all the time go, because they are the elite.

This shit about the emails is just smoke and mirrors for the ignorant, keeps the partisan troops in line.

 

[schism666]

The major differences are the felonies. Had Clinton been a poor nobody she'd at least had to have stood trial, and if the FBI had what they said they did she'd almost certainly be doing a 260 year bid in Leavenworth.

It's about the rule of law and Clinton being so obviously above the rule of law. That was the major beef....that is why "Lock her up" became a thing for everyone who had the IQ to realize they had just witness the most blatant in your face elitism in US history.

So if you want to stick (R)'s with hypocrisy on this case you're going to have to watch them let a high level (R) the FBI says they caught committing crimes go.

This shit about the emails is just smoke and mirrors for the ignorant, keeps the partisan troops in line.

its working well on you, that's for sure.
you're funny. hillary has literally never been charged with anything just like ivanka yet here you are wringing about "what if hillary was poor?!?!"

 

[Busybody18]

its working well on you, that's for sure.
you're funny. hillary has literally never been charged with anything just like ivanka yet here you are wringing about "what if hillary was poor?!?!"

you mean like teh NAVY guy?

 

[BotanyBoy]

its working well on you, that's for sure.

Great, another moron who doesn't understand the difference between a partisan and an ideologue

I guess since (D)'s are so pro-elitism and their pol's being above the law it COULD be seen as partisan to support the idea of equal treatment under the law.

(D)'s clearly don't care about things like that.

But still no...I support the idea of rule of law, not a party.

just like ivanka yet here you are wringing about "what if hillary was poor?!?!"

Really??

What felonies has the FBI come out and publicly announce that Ivanka committed?

Come on'...link that FBI page up. Let's see where the FBI directer outlines her crimes, the damning evidence they have against her, admits if this were anyone else they would be getting hammered but....because reasons....recommend no charges against Ivanka.

You know...like what they did with Clinton.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Post #285.

Prepare to have it thrown in your face.

And still waiting to hear how this great Dem conspiracy unfolded between the Comey-led FBI and the Obama White House.

Really? And where did I say that?


Quote plz....an actual one from me, not one you make up because you're dishonest.

Oh look, you still can't read can you???

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Another LMAO to note for the future.

You're going full on Alex Jones and fucking yourself in the ass to protect Deplorables on this issue. Keep going.

Great, another moron who doesn't understand the difference between a partisan and an ideologue

I guess since (D)'s are so pro-elitism and their pol's being above the law it COULD be seen as partisan to support the idea of equal treatment under the law.

(D)'s clearly don't care about things like that.

But still no...I support the idea of rule of law, not a party.



Really??

What felonies has the FBI come out and publicly announce that Ivanka committed?

Come on'...link that FBI page up. Let's see where the FBI directer outlines her crimes, the damning evidence they have against her, admits if this were anyone else they would be getting hammered but....because reasons....recommend no charges against Ivanka.

You know...like what they did with Clinton.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Post #285.

Was a response to Comshaw claiming that they were the exact same thing.

Not me claiming that they had to be and not even in the same format as that lie you pushed earlier when you made a quote of mine instead of actually quoiting me.

Because you can't quote me saying anything of the sort...because you're either totally full of shit or you really need to learn how to read.

Prepare to have it thrown in your face.

Better luck next time cucpcake.

 

[schism666]

Great, another moron who doesn't understand the difference between a partisan and an ideologue

I guess since (D)'s are so pro-elitism and their pol's being above the law it COULD be seen as partisan to support the idea of equal treatment under the law.

(D)'s clearly don't care about things like that.

But still no...I support the idea of rule of law, not a party.



Really??

What felonies has the FBI come out and publicly announce that Ivanka committed?

Come on'...link that FBI page up. Let's see where the FBI directer outlines her crimes, the damning evidence they have against her, admits if this were anyone else they would be getting hammered but....because reasons....recommend no charges against Ivanka.

You know...like what they did with Clinton.

i saw you crying yesterday about your words being taken out of context to make a point. you just did that to me here. you're a hypocrite and waste of skin.

neither hillary or ivanka have been charged with anything.


there, that's more like it.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And still waiting to hear how this great Dem conspiracy unfolded between the Comey-led FBI and the Obama White House.

Did you not pay attention?

Clinton is above the law....didn't even have to stand trial.

Another LMAO to note for the future.

You're going full on Alex Jones and fucking yourself in the ass to protect Deplorables on this issue. Keep going.

Except it's verifiable....well documented and recorded.

Unlike Ivankas situation, which you have little more than wishful thinking on.

 

[BotanyBoy]

i saw you crying yesterday about your words being taken out of context to make a point. you just did that to me here. you're a hypocrite and waste of skin.

Editing things down to get to the point =/= taking things out of context.


Jesus Christ get a fucking GED at some point will ya??

neither hillary or ivanka have been charged with anything.


there, that's more like it.

That's the fucking problem high speed.....

How are you so dumb that you do you not understand that?

 

[Luk]

Editing things down to get to the point =/= taking things out of context.


Jesus Christ get a fucking GED at some point will ya??



That's the fucking problem high speed.....

How are you so dumb that you do you not understand that?

This is why no one talks to you and when they do it's only to laugh at you.

 

[BotanyBoy]

This is why no one talks to you and when they do it's only to laugh at you.

Another moronic assumption from a smug (D)ick bag.

Even better....luk one of the biggest shit talking assholes who can't so much as hear a differing opinion without name calling is going to get all high and mighty like some fuckin' saint LOL

Your total lack of self awareness is telling.

Go do something useful for humanity.....like suck starting a shotgun.....

 

[Luk]

Go do something useful like suck starting a shotgun.....

Bwahahahahaha! Typical violent behavior from the RWCJ team mascot surprises no one. ( LMAO! )

 

[BotanyBoy]

Bwahahahahaha! Typical violent behavior from the RWCJ team mascot surprises no one. ( LMAO! )

Violent behavior?
https://media.tenor.com/images/f7354b8c66dcf774a0cd75d1806e0d56/tenor.gif


No.....it's a rude comment, I know you "progressives" have a VERY difficult time with literacy, but it's important so you should learn to English mmmkay??


Here...

http://www.hookedonphonics.com/

 

[Luk]

Violent behavior?
https://media.tenor.com/images/f7354b8c66dcf774a0cd75d1806e0d56/tenor.gif


No.....it's a rude comment, learn to English high speed.

Talk to your fellow RWCJ teammate, miles. He made the rules.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Talk to your fellow RWCJ teammate, miles. He made the rules.

My teammate???

You let miles cuck you with his rules???

https://media1.tenor.com/images/22d9689453caf1cd8e4da60495038966/tenor.gif?itemid=9467035


You're and even bigger idiot than I first thought....good job Luk.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Oh, so it doesn't have to be the exact same thing for it to be hypocritical? That hardly makes any sense, but it will certainly allow you to scream HYPOCRITE at Dems for anything at all.

"You never said anything when your guy did it!"

"My guy never did that."

"Doesn't matter. You're a hypocrite because I say so. And by the way Hillary and Ivanka didn't do the same thing."

You're flailing.

Was a response to Comshaw claiming that they were the exact same thing.

Not me claiming that they had to be and not even in the same format as that lie you pushed earlier when you made a quote of mine instead of actually quoiting me.

Because you can't quote me saying anything of the sort...because you're either totally full of shit or you really need to learn how to read.



Better luck next time cucpcake.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Right. You said that.

My question is how, and why? It was the FBI who made the decision, subsequently backed by the Inspector General. You're asserting that all those people involved decided she was above the law, and that's because elitist Dem. So how exactly did this play out with the lifetime Republican James Comey? And why did he reopen the investigation right before the election?

If you don't want to be Alex Jones spouting conspiracy theories out of your ass, then explain.

Did you not pay attention?

Clinton is above the law....didn't even have to stand trial.

 

[BotanyBoy]

You're flailing.

You're the one who keeps generating false quotes and engaging in wild ascription.

Right. You said that.

Yup. Good job on an actual quote.

My question is how, and why?

She took classified government documents in an unauthorized manner and then tried to cover it up, that's been confirmed by the FBI.

The FBI also said even though anyone else would have at least been subject to sanctions (due process, trial etc.) .....they would recommend no charges, AG obviously agreed so just like that she never stood trial for the crimes the FBI publicly said she committed.

Hardcore partisan (D)'s cheered because her highness was above the law!!!!

Hardcore partisan (R)'s cheered because fuck her!!!

Everyone else with a clue was pissed because it totally undermines the rule of law, it was an outrageous display of corruption and no doubt played a part in her loss of the election she should have been able to sleep through.

It was the FBI who made the decision

Incorrect.

That decision was the sole responsibility of AG Lynch.

She alone held the power and absolutely could have charged Clinton.

This is why everyone with a clue freaked out over her and Bill having shady ass tarmac meetings just before all this went down.

 

[Comshaw]

Right. You said that.

My question is how, and why? It was the FBI who made the decision, subsequently backed by the Inspector General. You're asserting that all those people involved decided she was above the law, and that's because elitist Dem. So how exactly did this play out with the lifetime Republican James Comey? And why did he reopen the investigation right before the election?

If you don't want to be Alex Jones spouting conspiracy theories out of your ass, then explain.

Originally Posted by BotanyBoy View Post
Did you not pay attention?

Clinton is above the law....didn't even have to stand trial.

I rarely see anything he posts any more. The only time that happens is when he's been quoted. You do realize that arguing with a Zealot is futile don't you? BB believes that Hillary wasn't prosecuted because she's rich and influential. He believes that Comey and the "deep state" allowed her to walk away without being charged or prosecuted. He disbelieves the FBI's ruling that what she did doesn't rise to the level of prosecution. At the same time he's willing to excuse and let Ivanka walk away without so much as a cursory look at what appears to be the same crime that he insists Hillary was guilty of.

Zealots don't operate on logic, or facts or even reasonable thought. they operate on belief, so anything they believe is true is and that which they don't isn't. You can't argue with belief because it is entirely manufactured from thin air and is rarely supported by facts. Don't waste your time. you can't convince him of anything using facts and logic or, the majority of time, even have a rational conversation. Arguing with a stump never got anyone anything other then frustrated.

The interesting thing is that "not Republican" BB spends all his time denigrating liberals (Dems) and extolling the virtues of and defending conservatives (Repubs). I was always taught that if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....


Comshaw

 

[Busybody18]

STFU, DingBat CUNTSHAW!