PuckIt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2017
- Posts
- 2,525
Mmm. I'm going to give a qualified agreement to what cookiecat and cascadiabound have said in that I don't agree with using the silent treatment or abandonment as a punishment or some sort of disciplinary tool. I think doing so for those reasons is pretty well an earmark of an emotional sadist.
Having said that, as I mentioned over here, I think there is a time when it is appropriate for the Dominant to step off and collect him or herself before continuing. In the scenario I cited, however, I did not do it as a punishment or disciplinary technique, but because my own emotions spiraled out of control. And I knew that whatever I did or said in that moment would come from a place of anger and resentment intending to strike back, to hurt back, just as I'd been hurt.
So, stepping away from Love in that time and place was much more about protecting her. Even from myself. Until my emotions and my thoughts were once more back in my control.
And, yes. As I discussed over there, it freaked her right the fuck out. She did take it as an abandonment. And she did take it as a punishment. But, I think some of the reason she did is because of some of the psychological make-up of the archetype little. It's been my experiences with littles that the old .38 special song is wrong. If you hold on loosely, to their mind, it is tantamount to pushing them away. They need to be held tightly. They need to be swaddled in love to the point that most others would feel constricted just to feel safe and wanted.
And even in that moment when I strode away from Love to the shower rather than do or say something we wouldn't be able to come back from, she needed so desperately to know that it was okay that she attempted to follow me. Only it was not okay. Not at that moment.
Once I was back in control and granted it did take a bit since I neither anger nor get over it easily, I went back out to her and held her in my lap while I continued the discussion we'd been having that set me off. Including my own reactions and the reason for it.
As I say, I did not use it as a tool against her, but to protect her. And in my mind that makes a difference. But, to her mind...? I've never been certain. I was only forced to such an extreme three times that I can recall in twenty-five years. But, the other two times I did at least manage to grit out that she was to sit on the couch and wait for me to come continue the discussion. That first time, I couldn't even do that much.
*shrug*
Any road, I said all that not to disagree with two very intelligent women, because I too believe that using "the silent treatment" or the submissive's fear of abandonment as a teaching tool is just flat wrong. But, I also just wanted to add the small proviso that done the right way, stepping away rather than reacting out of anger is a definite better alternative.
Of course, in all three cases, once the situation had been handled to my satisfaction, I took the time and effort to make her know that I had reclaimed her through ever fiber of her being. Even if it took 'til morning.
And I think that was important too.
Having said that, as I mentioned over here, I think there is a time when it is appropriate for the Dominant to step off and collect him or herself before continuing. In the scenario I cited, however, I did not do it as a punishment or disciplinary technique, but because my own emotions spiraled out of control. And I knew that whatever I did or said in that moment would come from a place of anger and resentment intending to strike back, to hurt back, just as I'd been hurt.
So, stepping away from Love in that time and place was much more about protecting her. Even from myself. Until my emotions and my thoughts were once more back in my control.
And, yes. As I discussed over there, it freaked her right the fuck out. She did take it as an abandonment. And she did take it as a punishment. But, I think some of the reason she did is because of some of the psychological make-up of the archetype little. It's been my experiences with littles that the old .38 special song is wrong. If you hold on loosely, to their mind, it is tantamount to pushing them away. They need to be held tightly. They need to be swaddled in love to the point that most others would feel constricted just to feel safe and wanted.
And even in that moment when I strode away from Love to the shower rather than do or say something we wouldn't be able to come back from, she needed so desperately to know that it was okay that she attempted to follow me. Only it was not okay. Not at that moment.
Once I was back in control and granted it did take a bit since I neither anger nor get over it easily, I went back out to her and held her in my lap while I continued the discussion we'd been having that set me off. Including my own reactions and the reason for it.
As I say, I did not use it as a tool against her, but to protect her. And in my mind that makes a difference. But, to her mind...? I've never been certain. I was only forced to such an extreme three times that I can recall in twenty-five years. But, the other two times I did at least manage to grit out that she was to sit on the couch and wait for me to come continue the discussion. That first time, I couldn't even do that much.
*shrug*
Any road, I said all that not to disagree with two very intelligent women, because I too believe that using "the silent treatment" or the submissive's fear of abandonment as a teaching tool is just flat wrong. But, I also just wanted to add the small proviso that done the right way, stepping away rather than reacting out of anger is a definite better alternative.
Of course, in all three cases, once the situation had been handled to my satisfaction, I took the time and effort to make her know that I had reclaimed her through ever fiber of her being. Even if it took 'til morning.
And I think that was important too.
Last edited:
