If the conceal carry rate is 16%, that means you're near 16 guns each day?

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
61,370
This is what our resident "Mensa" gun nut (coachdb18) said:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1476599

The conceal carry rate in America is about 16%, so in any given day in which you cross paths with Americans, and you’ve been in the presence of at least 16 guns, guns that are there to protect their owner, and has no effect on your day

...and this is why we don't trust deplorables with guns. It's not because guns are bad - it's because deplorables are really fucking stupid. And too chickenshit to call their own out. :(

(Or will they? Let's watch...)
 
This is what our resident "Mensa" gun nut (coachdb18) said:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1476599



...and this is why we don't trust deplorables with guns. It's not because guns are bad - it's because deplorables are really fucking stupid. And too chickenshit to call their own out. :(

(Or will they? Let's watch...)

But what does von Bismark think, Rory? I hear you guys are twins...triplets if you throw in Palpatine. :)
 
I figure there's a typo in there somewhere. If it's 6%, then out of 16 people, one is carrying (although it's closer to 17 people). If it's 16%, then one out of six (or six and a quarter).
 
I figure there's a typo in there somewhere. If it's 6%, then out of 16 people, one is carrying (although it's closer to 17 people). If it's 16%, then one out of six (or six and a quarter).

He already edited once...and did not correct it. :D
 
He said several stupid things in that thread. Plus when I looked it up I didn't see 16% anywhere, More like 6 to 10%. Combine that with the other ignorant shit he said and you really figure he just pulled it all out of his ass and convinced himself it was all true.
 
The lonely tranny is scrambling with deflections for coach binky's defense. lmao.

Turds of a feather and all that.:)
 
Do you remember your 3rd post, vB? You were correction someone's spelling. That was in 2003

^^^
Unless you've been here awhile, you won't realise how very sad this comment is. It's becoming clearer that this is someone who has probably depended on this forum for many years as their only source of social interaction.

I made one alt, a covert one, in 2003, which I used for a total of maybe 4 posts. I then had another - TheZenOfSkin - which I announced when I created it. Only did around 100 posts on that one. Those were my only alts. I've had several lengthy sabbaticals from here as well since joining.

In contrast, Ann has probably been here the entire time and never left, with alts well into the double digits. I thought he was just a troll. It's more likely that, in addition to being one, he isn't well. :(

I've curtailed my attacks accordingly, but I can't really do anything further re: the infatuation & stalking he has / does in regards to me. I will try to ignore from now on.

#BeBest
 
Well 40% of gun owners identify as liberals so I guess that accounts for the stupid gun owners. The reason we can't have an intelligent debate about guns is because most liberals aren't rational enough or simply have no idea what they're talking about.

I could post online in a few places about how ammunition with death crystals in them is responsible for more deaths in children and you'd all be demanding death crystal bullets be banned in a few days.


Trump supporters are stupid mean and racist....Keep saying it I'm sure you'll win people over.
 
Is the OP absolutely sure of that ratio simply becuz yet another arch nemesis of his presents itself?

If I didn't know any better there's a plot and collusion between ancient posters and newbies alike to overthrow the GB heads of state(s).

Who's next to appear? What diabolical plot is this?
 
This is what our resident "Mensa" gun nut (coachdb18) said:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1476599



...and this is why we don't trust deplorables with guns. It's not because guns are bad - it's because deplorables are really fucking stupid. And too chickenshit to call their own out. :(

(Or will they? Let's watch...)

The math works if he consistently crosses paths with 100 other Americans per day
 
you guys are talking about a guy who said that anyone who lives on either coast should be killed while claiming to live in a coastal state. basically, he's not smart. it'd probably be best if you just ignored him.
 
you guys are talking about a guy who said that anyone who lives on either coast should be killed while claiming to live in a coastal state.
Either coast. That's the original 13 colonies / states and Ecotopia. Dunno if Alaska and Hawai'i count.

Did he forget the south coast? We don't want to leave Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida populated.

Do the Great Lakes count? There go Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota. And Arizona has a west coast.

What's left? Maybe 1/10 of the current US population, Nevada to West Virginia, New Mexico to the Dakotas. Insufficient tax base. Better try another plan.

basically, he's not smart. it'd probably be best if you just ignored him.
That's common here.
 
He's about as good at math as AJ.

What he was trying to say is that people encounter other legal concealed carry holders on a regular basis, and have no idea. He's right on that point.

I can't defend him on his mathematical stupidity though. Unless maybe he has some sort of weird job where he does actually encounter exactly 100 people every day. I don't know his circumstances... I do know he's kind of dumb though.
 
This is what our resident "Mensa" gun nut (coachdb18) said:

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1476599



...and this is why we don't trust deplorables with guns. It's not because guns are bad - it's because deplorables are really fucking stupid. And too chickenshit to call their own out. :(

(Or will they? Let's watch...)

This really made me laugh ... I'm kind of fond of Coach Binky's ineptitude with statistics. He just constantly fucks them up, but keeps on throwing them around as though he knows what he's doing with them. I honestly wanted to start a thread at one point called 'Coach Binky and his adorable stats' or something like that.
 
Seems to me there are enough situations where experienced, highly trained police get things wrong and kill people by shooting them, that would worry me with that number of rank fucking amatuers carrying weapons.
 
Seems to me there are enough situations where experienced, highly trained police get things wrong and kill people by shooting them, that would worry me with that number of rank fucking amatuers carrying weapons.
Those rank fucking amateurs (and cops too) are twice as likely to kill themselves as anyone else, so there's that.
 
Seems to me there are enough situations where experienced, highly trained police get things wrong and kill people by shooting them, that would worry me with that number of rank fucking amatuers carrying weapons.

You think cops are trained when it comes to guns?

Cops only get a few hours of training during their academy class. And then they only have to requalify 1x per year after that with their in-house range-master on their government paid for range, with government paid for ammo. OH, and they're on duty when they do it, so they GET PAID at the same time.

I can only speak for California, but concealed gun carriers are mandated to have at least 8 hours of actual gun training, and as many as 24 hours of training in some jurisdictions just to get the license/permit. We have to requalify every 2 years with a minimum of 4-12 hours of retraining depending on the jurisdiction.

Currently, here in California renewals require 4 hours of classroom and range qualification. Qualification must be with EVERY gun we carry. Not just 1, ALL of them - up to 5 for my issuing authority. The cost is hundreds of dollars for the class, hundreds of dollars for the range/ammo costs (if you have more than 2 guns you carry) and all of that is paid for by the permit holder. In short, if you have a concealed carry permit, it's EXPENSIVE to get and keep a permit. And you won't keep it if you don't practice your skills in between retraining and qualification because you won't qualify in the performance test at the range. Which adds more cost.

My license costs me around $2.5K/year if I go to the range regularly, amortize the requalification costs and include the additional personal liability insurance. Those are the direct costs. If I included the indirect costs, like loss of work, travel, cleaning supplies, maintenance/repair, etc, the yearly cost probably doubles. For those who want higher skill training there are also gun academies like Frontsight and Gunsight which cost THOUSANDS of dollars to attend. And their classes are always full.

Compared to cops, most of us** are not "rank fucking amateurs". Anyone who thinks we are, has no clue about the subject.






**I can't say it's 100% because life isn't so clean and simple when it comes to people. But, the majority of concealed carriers are law-abiding and well-trained in the use of firearms.
 
You think cops are trained when it comes to guns?

Cops only get a few hours of training during their academy class. And then they only have to requalify 1x per year after that with their in-house range-master on their government paid for range, with government paid for ammo. OH, and they're on duty when they do it, so they GET PAID at the same time.

I can only speak for California, but concealed gun carriers are mandated to have at least 8 hours of actual gun training, and as many as 24 hours of training in some jurisdictions just to get the license/permit. We have to requalify every 2 years with a minimum of 4-12 hours of retraining depending on the jurisdiction.

Currently, here in California renewals require 4 hours of classroom and range qualification. Qualification must be with EVERY gun we carry. Not just 1, ALL of them - up to 5 for my issuing authority. The cost is hundreds of dollars for the class, hundreds of dollars for the range/ammo costs (if you have more than 2 guns you carry) and all of that is paid for by the permit holder. In short, if you have a concealed carry permit, it's EXPENSIVE to get and keep a permit. And you won't keep it if you don't practice your skills in between retraining and qualification because you won't qualify in the performance test at the range. Which adds more cost.

My license costs me around $2.5K/year if I go to the range regularly, amortize the requalification costs and include the additional personal liability insurance. Those are the direct costs. If I included the indirect costs, like loss of work, travel, cleaning supplies, maintenance/repair, etc, the yearly cost probably doubles. For those who want higher skill training there are also gun academies like Frontsight and Gunsight which cost THOUSANDS of dollars to attend. And their classes are always full.

Compared to cops, most of us** are not "rank fucking amateurs". Anyone who thinks we are, has no clue about the subject


**I can't say it's 100% because life isn't so clean and simple when it comes to people. But, the majority of concealed carriers are law-abiding and well-trained in the use of firearms.


you're a proven liar and not all that bright so please forgive us for not giving a shit about what you have to say on any given subject.
 
Back
Top