Why does anyone NEED an assault rifle?

[BotanyBoy]

I'm nearly blind in my left eye but I can read the first two clauses that so many miss. If it was writ in Hebrew, it would read backwards, but I'd still see the last clause. The parts form the whole, duh. Judges and civilians claiming otherwise are wrong. It's really not difficult.

Says the fuckin' twat who regularly ignores everything in 2A but the words "well regulated", "militia" and "necessary" IN THE WRONG FUCKING ORDER on a regular basis.

Don't like what the Constitution says? Just make shit up like Hypoxia!

 

[My I]

O.k I'm going to take one more shot at it and then I'm going to give up since I'm not sure if you're obtuse or just playing at it.

Explosives and WMD's are well regulated, right? You can't walk into a store anywhere in the US and buy dynamite. Since McVeigh blew up a federal building, fertilizer is well regulated, right? I'm aware that some hunting rifles are capable of doing the same damage as an "assault weapon." That is why I advocate for strict regulations on any firearm that capable of mass murder like dynamite or a fertilizer explosive.

We have too many crazy people in the US that we can do little about. What we can do to save innocent lives is to make some weapons inaccessible.

Ok. I'm going to make one more "shot" (interesting choice of words) at enlightening the blind.

Guns ARE regulated just as much as dynamite and explosive fertilizers. You cannot just walk into a store and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. You cannot go to a gunshow and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. There is a three page form you have to fill out and show valid photo ID. That information is IMMEDIATELY run through NICS and a response is returned within 20 min either authorizing the purchase or denying it. If it is denied, there is no sale.

The Parkland shooter bought his gun "legally" because the Sheriff failed to add pertinent information to the NCIC database that the NICS uses for that background check. You want to blame someone??? Blame that Sheriff and the FBI agents that were WARNED and did NOTHING.

Yet some people get dynamite illegally and some get fertilizer illegally and some get guns illegally.

PUNISH THE FUCKING CRIMINALS!!!!​

How fucking hard is that for you to understand??? YOU are the one being obtuse. In America we DO NOT punish the innocent. That is one of the basic principles this country is founded on.

Just less than 2% of ALL murders last year were by rifles IN GENERAL. That includes bolt action, lever action, pump action, single shot and muzzle loaders as well as semi-autos. There were FIVE TIMES MORE murders in this country by KNIFE.

11 children in this country die EVERY SINGLE DAY in traffic accidents caused by cell phone use. EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!!!! But you don't WANT to regulate THAT, do you?

Who is being obtuse??? You might want to look that word up because I don't think it means what YOU think it means.

 

[Gamine67]

Ok. I'm going to make one more "shot" (interesting choice of words) at enlightening the blind.

Guns ARE regulated just as much as dynamite and explosive fertilizers. You cannot just walk into a store and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. You cannot go to a gunshow and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. There is a three page form you have to fill out and show valid photo ID. That information is IMMEDIATELY run through NICS and a response is returned within 20 min either authorizing the purchase or denying it. If it is denied, there is no sale.

The Parkland shooter bought his gun "legally" because the Sheriff failed to add pertinent information to the NCIC database that the NICS uses for that background check. You want to blame someone??? Blame that Sheriff and the FBI agents that were WARNED and did NOTHING.

Yet some people get dynamite illegally and some get fertilizer illegally and some get guns illegally.

PUNISH THE FUCKING CRIMINALS!!!!​

How fucking hard is that for you to understand??? YOU are the one being obtuse. In America we DO NOT punish the innocent. That is one of the basic principles this country is founded on.

Just less than 2% of ALL murders last year were by rifles IN GENERAL. That includes bolt action, lever action, pump action, single shot and muzzle loaders as well as semi-autos. There were FIVE TIMES MORE murders in this country by KNIFE.

11 children in this country die EVERY SINGLE DAY in traffic accidents caused by cell phone use. EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!!!! But you don't WANT to regulate THAT, do you?

Who is being obtuse??? You might want to look that word up because I don't think it means what YOU think it means.

There is a lot of ‘Woulda’, ‘Shoulda’, ‘Coulda’ here and a great deal of unnecessary explititives which show your argument can’t stand on its own merits.

Since this is so complicated let’s make it simple; your darling spawn is hitting other kids with sticks.

Oh my, what to do?

A. Give every kid a stick (NRA Solution)
B. Give only ‘Special’ kids sticks (Bullet Head Solution)
C. TAKE THE STICK AWAY. (Adult Solution)

But what about the sanctity of the 2nd Amendment?

You might want to pause and consider the 21st Amendment. It repeals the 18th Amendment because the People demanded it. The 18th Amendment was obsolete, disliked and out-of-touch with modern realities, so we chucked it because we are a wise and compassionate people.

I personally don’t want to deny anyone their 2nd Amendment rights, I only want the 28th Amendment written to repeal them.

And since there are so many “law abiding” gun owners the problem will be solved overnight, or those formally “law abiding” gun owners can choose to be criminals if they don’t comply and the Justice system will deal with them.

Easy Peazy.

Then we can move on with the 29th Amendment, the ERA.

 

[My I]

Here is the "Truth" the liberal media wants you to misrepresent like they do:

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BBKGsqx.img?h=847&w=728&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f

Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this picture?

 

[My I]

There is a lot of ‘Woulda’, ‘Shoulda’, ‘Coulda’ here and a great deal of unnecessary explititives which show your argument can’t stand on its own merits.

Since this is so complicated let’s make it simple; your darling spawn is hitting other kids with sticks.

Oh my, what to do?

A. Give every kid a stick (NRA Solution)
B. Give only ‘Special’ kids sticks (Bullet Head Solution)
C. TAKE THE STICK AWAY. (Adult Solution)

But what about the sanctity of the 2nd Amendment?

You might want to pause and consider the 21st Amendment. It repeals the 18th Amendment because the People demanded it. The 18th Amendment was obsolete, disliked and out-of-touch with modern realities, so we chucked it because we are a wise and compassionate people.

I personally don’t want to deny anyone their 2nd Amendment rights, I only want the 28th Amendment written to repeal them.

And since there are so many “law abiding” gun owners the problem will be solved overnight, or those formally “law abiding” gun owners can choose to be criminals if they don’t comply and the Justice system will deal with them.

Easy Peazy.

Then we can move on with the 29th Amendment, the ERA.

What planet are you on where that is a reality?

Do you really believe the criminals are going to just turn in their guns because you passed a law banning them?

The 29th amendment? Another alternate reality? Or do you know so little about the constitution that you don't know the equal rights amendment is the 19th?

EDIT: BTW, the reason for the expletives and my frustration is that I have explained this EXTREMELY simple concept at least a dozen times in this thread but there are some liberal imbeciles here who can't seem to grasp a simple logic.

 

[coachdb18]

What planet are you on where that is a reality?

Do you really believe the criminals are going to just turn in their guns because you passed a law banning them?

The 29th amendment? Another alternate reality? Or do you know so little about the constitution that you don't know the equal rights amendment is the 19th?

EDIT: BTW, the reason for the expletives and my frustration is that I have explained this EXTREMELY simple concept at least a dozen times in this thread but there are some liberal imbeciles here who can't seem to grasp a simple logic.

Worse than that, this little millennial can't grasp the concept of Natural Law, and fails to realize the repealing the law of gravity makes every bit as little sense as repealing the right to self defense. She's just another little airhead with big ideas, and little to no life experience... but still insists on changing the world to fit her diaper ready views.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Ok. I'm going to make one more "shot" (interesting choice of words) at enlightening the blind.

Guns ARE regulated just as much as dynamite and explosive fertilizers. You cannot just walk into a store and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. You cannot go to a gunshow and lay down some 20s and walk out with a gun. There is a three page form you have to fill out and show valid photo ID. That information is IMMEDIATELY run through NICS and a response is returned within 20 min either authorizing the purchase or denying it. If it is denied, there is no sale.

The Parkland shooter bought his gun "legally" because the Sheriff failed to add pertinent information to the NCIC database that the NICS uses for that background check. You want to blame someone??? Blame that Sheriff and the FBI agents that were WARNED and did NOTHING.

Yet some people get dynamite illegally and some get fertilizer illegally and some get guns illegally.

PUNISH THE FUCKING CRIMINALS!!!!​

How fucking hard is that for you to understand??? YOU are the one being obtuse. In America we DO NOT punish the innocent. That is one of the basic principles this country is founded on.

Just less than 2% of ALL murders last year were by rifles IN GENERAL. That includes bolt action, lever action, pump action, single shot and muzzle loaders as well as semi-autos. There were FIVE TIMES MORE murders in this country by KNIFE.

11 children in this country die EVERY SINGLE DAY in traffic accidents caused by cell phone use. EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DAY!!!! But you don't WANT to regulate THAT, do you?

Who is being obtuse??? You might want to look that word up because I don't think it means what YOU think it means.

No one wants to punish you, we just don't want to sacrifice our lives because you have an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object.

 

[My I]

A. Give the assaulted kid a stick and teach him to use it properly and responsibly (NRA Solution)
B. Give only ‘Special’ kids sticks (Bullet Head Solution)
C. TAKE THE STICK AWAY. (Liberal Solution)
D. Give the mean kid a hug so he feels better about himself and send the beaten kid for trauma counciling. (Idealistic Liberal Airhead Solution
E. Take the stick from the kid using it violently and whip his little ass with then explain to him why we do not hit others with sticks. (Proper Solution)

Fixed that for you. "E." is what is known as LAW ENFORCEMENT. But you don't want THAT because it might offend someone or interfere with their rights.

 

[My I]

No one wants to punish you, we just don't want to sacrifice our lives because you have an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object.

Again What reality are YOU in??? You are in NO DANGER whatsoever from the law abiding gun owners in this country. Here's a cluepon for you: CCW carriers commit less crimes than the police. Here's another: You are more likely to die of choking on your food than being shot by an "assault rifle". Maybe you better stick to things like yogurt and pudding to reduce your risk.

And your lack of knowledge or understanding of firearms does not mean I have "an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object." In fact it's you Liberals who seem fixated on it. What you don't know anything about can be a pretty scary thing. But there is a cure. It's called learning. Something you are apparently incapable of.

EDIT: You MAY, on the other hand, be in danger from people you KNOW wanting to beat the shit out of you for being an ignorant asshole. In your case that beating could take a VERY long time.

 

[phrodeau]

I am quite sure that if there is a ban on weapons, it won't remove them from the possession of most gun owners, because most gun owners will not abide those laws. I have seen this in the gun owners I know. They proudly display questionably legal items that they've managed to collect, and have no intention of handing them over to anybody. I see it on this board from the gun activists who talk about plastic guns that get through metal detectors and guns created on 3D printers. They will always find a way to get and keep illegal weapons.

Don't kid yourself that the guy up the road will hand over that greasebucket full of high-capacity magazines when the sheriff comes around. Or that the gun shop owner will quietly shutter his business and melt down his inventory. The high majority of those law-abiding citizens will turn to crime on a dime.

 

[My I]

I am quite sure that if there is a ban on weapons, it won't remove them from the possession of most gun owners, because most gun owners will not abide those laws. I have seen this in the gun owners I know. They proudly display questionably legal items that they've managed to collect, and have no intention of handing them over to anybody. I see it on this board from the gun activists who talk about plastic guns that get through metal detectors and guns created on 3D printers. They will always find a way to get and keep illegal weapons.

Don't kid yourself that the guy up the road will hand over that greasebucket full of high-capacity magazines when the sheriff comes around. Or that the gun shop owner will quietly shutter his business and melt down his inventory. The high majority of those law-abiding citizens will turn to crime on a dime.

And he would be a criminal by YOUR actions, not so much his own. The people you know are NOT the normal gun owner, despite what you may think. But I can GUARANTEE one type of person who definitely will never surrender his guns to a new law banning them. The Criminals.

 

[coachdb18]

The high majority of those law-abiding citizens will turn to crime on a dime.

I'm proud as an American to know that our people would still kick your people's ass for the failures to uphold freedom, as was done in 1776. Brits should know better than to try and impose 'laws' on the free, that are only intended to strip that freedom from them. GOOD for the Americans, who signed the Declaration of Independence from such idiots as King George III, and thank God the blood of those earlier patriots will still be found running in the veins of those who would oppose King George's still unconvinced cretins. We have a Constitution, it was set in place in direct contrast to the British who fought to kill it, and apparently still do not respect us or our 200+ years of example of what it means to be a free and self reliant people. We call your imposition of 'laws' in contradiction to our rule of law treason. So pardon me if I simply tell you to take your contrived 'laws', and kindly go fuck yourself.

 

[phrodeau]

I'm proud as an American to know that our people would still kick your people's ass for the failures to uphold freedom, as was done in 1776. Brits should know better than to try and impose 'laws' on the free, that are only intended to strip that freedom from them. GOOD for the Americans, who signed the Declaration of Independence from such idiots as King George III, and thank God the blood of those earlier patriots will still be found running in the veins of those who would oppose King George's still unconvinced cretins. We have a Constitution, it was set in place in direct contrast to the British who fought to kill it, and apparently still do not respect us or our 200+ years of example of what it means to be a free and self reliant people. We call your imposition of 'laws' in contradiction to our rule of law treason. So pardon me if I simply tell you to take your contrived 'laws', and kindly go fuck yourself.

Well, maybe you should think again about the kind of person you are.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Again What reality are YOU in??? You are in NO DANGER whatsoever from the law abiding gun owners in this country. Here's a cluepon for you: CCW carriers commit less crimes than the police. Here's another: You are more likely to die of choking on your food than being shot by an "assault rifle". Maybe you better stick to things like yogurt and pudding to reduce your risk.

And your lack of knowledge or understanding of firearms does not mean I have "an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object." In fact it's you Liberals who seem fixated on it. What you don't know anything about can be a pretty scary thing. But there is a cure. It's called learning. Something you are apparently incapable of.

EDIT: You MAY, on the other hand, be in danger from people you KNOW wanting to beat the shit out of you for being an ignorant asshole. In your case that beating could take a VERY long time.

That's some good shit. Really made me laugh.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I am quite sure that if there is a ban on weapons, it won't remove them from the possession of most gun owners, because most gun owners will not abide those laws. I have seen this in the gun owners I know. They proudly display questionably legal items that they've managed to collect, and have no intention of handing them over to anybody. I see it on this board from the gun activists who talk about plastic guns that get through metal detectors and guns created on 3D printers. They will always find a way to get and keep illegal weapons.

Don't kid yourself that the guy up the road will hand over that greasebucket full of high-capacity magazines when the sheriff comes around. Or that the gun shop owner will quietly shutter his business and melt down his inventory. The high majority of those law-abiding citizens will turn to crime on a dime.

Well said, Mr. phrodeau

 

[coachdb18]

Well said, Mr. phrodeau

Two monkeys, one with a typewriter, the other banging a set of cymbals in approval....

 

[KimGordon67]

Here is the "Truth" the liberal media wants you to misrepresent like they do:

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BBKGsqx.img?h=847&w=728&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f

Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this picture?

You really do specialise in refuting claims no one has made. I guess that's easier than responding to people's actual points.

 

[Blue]

Here is the "Truth" the liberal media wants you to misrepresent like they do:


Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this picture?

'Assault by gun' & 'Assault by sharp object', so intentional homicide using weapons, aka murder, are separate categories from 'Murder' with no context on how they calculate the 'murder' figure?

Weird chart indeed.

 

[Hypoxia]

I've repeatedly said that firearms 'control', as in confiscation, won't happen in USA. Making, selling, and possessing firearms can't be stopped. It's much too late for that. And I really have no problem with people possessing weapons... privately. Gather the YUUGEST arsenal possible, fire them safely on private property, and see if I care.

That's in private. Public is another matter. Leave your guns at home unless you're a registered member of a well-regulated militia with a valid reason for carrying in public. Violators should be severely punished. Firearms aren't fucking toys.

Any who think the future will look like the past are sorely deluded.

 

[coachdb18]

We need to amend ObamaCare, to REQUIRE that every citizen not mentally incompetent as MEDICALLY (not politically) defined buy and carry a handgun, for their healthcare protection from physical harm. This is a mandate, as originally established by ObamaCare, for the protection of every citizens health, or pay an IRS fine, therefore there is no decision to be made as to whether the individual wants or feels they need this, it is the governments job to make the rules as to how best to protect your health.

 

[Blue]

We need to amend ObamaCare, to REQUIRE that every citizen not mentally incompetent as MEDICALLY (not politically) defined buy and carry a handgun, for their healthcare protection from physical harm. This is a mandate, as originally established by ObamaCare, for the protection of every citizens health, or pay an IRS fine, therefore there is no decision to be made as to whether the individual wants or feels they need this, it is the governments job to make the rules as to how best to protect your health.

You actually used to have that already.
An Obama-era regulation prevented people who were dependent on a carer to do their finances for them (set as a threshold to define exactly where somebody lacked enough mental competence) or who has been committed to a mental institution, from buying and possessing guns.

Trump repealed it. Because he cares more about the $26m the NRA bought him with than your lives.

 

[coachdb18]

You actually used to have that already.
An Obama-era regulation prevented people who were dependent on a carer to do their finances for them (set as a threshold to define exactly where somebody lacked enough mental competence) or who has been committed to a mental institution, from buying and possessing guns.

Trump repealed it. Because he cares more about the $26m the NRA bought him with than your lives.

Understand this is a requirement to possess and carry a handgun, not a restriction from having one. Quite different....

 

[KimGordon67]

'Assault by gun' & 'Assault by sharp object', so intentional homicide using weapons, aka murder, are separate categories from 'Murder' with no context on how they calculate the 'murder' figure?

Weird chart indeed.

Ha - that is weird indeed.

But let's also look at it from another perspective, that of the individualistic neo-liberal. Most of the things on that chart are, from a neo-liberal perspective, people's 'own fault'. (I don't think that for a second, but that's the classic free market economy approach.) If I choose to eat myself into a heart attack, or smoke myself into lung cancer, that's my own look-out. I think it would be a little more accurate, from that perspective, to provide a chart that only took into account instances where someone's individual right to continue living had been infringed upon by someone else. Like, an actual someone else, not a socio-economic context (because that way lies socialism).

 

[KimGordon67]

Again What reality are YOU in??? You are in NO DANGER whatsoever from the law abiding gun owners in this country. Here's a cluepon for you: CCW carriers commit less crimes than the police. Here's another: You are more likely to die of choking on your food than being shot by an "assault rifle". Maybe you better stick to things like yogurt and pudding to reduce your risk.

And your lack of knowledge or understanding of firearms does not mean I have "an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object." In fact it's you Liberals who seem fixated on it. What you don't know anything about can be a pretty scary thing. But there is a cure. It's called learning. Something you are apparently incapable of.

EDIT: You MAY, on the other hand, be in danger from people you KNOW wanting to beat the shit out of you for being an ignorant asshole. In your case that beating could take a VERY long time.

Again with the random stats - where's your evidence to support these statements?

 

[KimGordon67]

Again What reality are YOU in??? You are in NO DANGER whatsoever from the law abiding gun owners in this country. Here's a cluepon for you: CCW carriers commit less crimes than the police. Here's another: You are more likely to die of choking on your food than being shot by an "assault rifle". Maybe you better stick to things like yogurt and pudding to reduce your risk.

And your lack of knowledge or understanding of firearms does not mean I have "an unnatural fixation with an inanimate object." In fact it's you Liberals who seem fixated on it. What you don't know anything about can be a pretty scary thing. But there is a cure. It's called learning. Something you are apparently incapable of.

EDIT: You MAY, on the other hand, be in danger from people you KNOW wanting to beat the shit out of you for being an ignorant asshole. In your case that beating could take a VERY long time.

Also, this statement: "You are in NO DANGER whatsoever from the law abiding gun owners in this country." is a ... something. I don't think an oxymoron. A tautology, maybe. Obviously, the second a gun owner injures/kills someone with their gun (not in self defence), they stop being 'law-abiding' and become a criminal. So that's just a meaningless statement.