So when does this become considered as getting out of hand?

EternalFantasies

EqualOportunity"Offender"
Joined
Feb 25, 2017
Posts
4,663
Anyone who has ever tried any line on anyone is getting romped.

Now Steven Segal, for asking an actress and over the phone, if she didn't mind sitting on his face for an hour...

Where's this all going?
 
Anyone who has ever tried any line on anyone is getting romped.

Now Steven Segal, for asking an actress and over the phone, if she didn't mind sitting on his face for an hour...

Where's this all going?

Thirty years ago we had a bright line about this.

We had the national discussion about the impropriety of any kind of sexual content of any sort when there's a power differential after Clarence Thomas. That was a very well understood line. That line was completely erased when one half of the country insisted that the most powerful man on the entire planet engaging in sexual activity with an underling with no power was perfectly okay and a "private, sexual matter." So "normal" that is okay to lie and even commit perjury about it.

Louis CK, for all his faults absolutely 100% nailed the concept. Not only did he unequivocally take responsibility accept blame and with no reservations apologize, he actually understands that asking for consent does not make it not coercive.
 
The line was well understood? The fucking pervert got on the Supreme Court!
 
The line was well understood? The fucking pervert got on the Supreme Court!

He's a pervert? Far as I know he never penetrated any co-workers with a foreign object in the office.

Since apparently you need a little bit of a rimeline, perhaps I can explain it to you. Because of them trying to Bork Thomas they found Anita Hill. This LED to a national discussion about why it was in fact not a high-tech lynching, but a reasonable guage pf charater. This national discussion was where the bright line was drawn in every corporate handbook in America.

That understanding completely died when all of the very same people that went on National Television to denounce Clarence Thomas refuse to do so for Bill Clinton. That's why we are where we are today.

We have an entire generation now raised with the understanding that the boss getting it on with an intern is a private sexual matter.

To this day when you mention Bill Clinton everyone keeps restating that it was only about a blowjob. No one on the left will admit that it was about coercion and power. The left owns this 100%
 
Anyone who has ever tried any line on anyone is getting romped.

Now Steven Segal, for asking an actress and over the phone, if she didn't mind sitting on his face for an hour...

Where's this all going?

Criminality aside, generally men must be tamed, feminized, and made to conform to neutered social parameters demanded of them by left-wing feminists. Feminists won't be happy until we reach the point where upon seeing the approach of women in public, men simply avoid eye contact and cross the street in deference. The dating process, assuming it still exists, will be like applying for a home loan.:D
 
The line was well understood? The fucking pervert got on the Supreme Court!

Didn't stop Bill Clinton from achieving the White House nor keep Wilbur Mills and Ted Kennedy out of the Congress.
 
Lck probably hoped and may have expected the two women he showed his penis to in private were not going to say anything in public.

The married women and mothers here showing their bodies and saying various things on this public, insecure web site probably also mistakenly believe nobody will go public with their improprieties on their local craigslist or local bulliten board.

If that happened to you, would you feel you should lose your career, marriage, children, etc?

Or should all people mind their own business?



Also, the men being destroyed are not the handsome ones.

Is it only the ugly men starlets resent sleeping with to build their careers?

Or is it just not a “crime” to shag a director you like?

Does the coin have one side or two?

What then is “equality”?
 
Penetrating with a foreign object is your criterion for being a pervert...? :rolleyes:

No it isn't mine, but I've never heard Adre refer to Bill Clinton as a pervert. Because unless Bill Clinton's a pervert Clarence Thomas certainly isn't.
 
Last edited:
He's a pervert? Far as I know he never penetrated any co-workers with a foreign object in the office.

Since apparently you need a little bit of a rimeline, perhaps I can explain it to you. Because of them trying to Bork Thomas they found Anita Hill. This LED to a national discussion about why it was in fact not a high-tech lynching, but a reasonable guage pf charater. This national discussion was where the bright line was drawn in every corporate handbook in America.

That understanding completely died when all of the very same people that went on National Television to denounce Clarence Thomas refuse to do so for Bill Clinton. That's why we are where we are today.

We have an entire generation now raised with the understanding that the boss getting it on with an intern is a private sexual matter.

To this day when you mention Bill Clinton everyone keeps restating that it was only about a blowjob. No one on the left will admit that it was about coercion and power. The left owns this 100%

Your definition of pervert is...well, perverted.

Oh, so they just went out and found a woman who had Clarence’s pubes on her can of Coke. OK then.

Monica wanted to suck Bill’s dick, he didn’t make her.

An entire generation? So presumably you know all fifty million of them then.

As usual with you, in the end the left gets the blame no matter what. Even when it’s a right wing nut job caressing fourteen year olds. Okey dokey.
 
Anyone who has ever tried any line on anyone is getting romped.

Now Steven Segal, for asking an actress and over the phone, if she didn't mind sitting on his face for an hour...

Where's this all going?

Yet, some people still deny everything in the mainstream is a conspiracy scripted by the New World Order.

Where is it going? People will only be allowed to have sex with robots, not with each other to avoid "harrassing" or "abusing" anyone, except for lesbians who will be the only ones permitted to "do it" with each other.

Men will be forbidden from sex with other humans because they are officially abusers and all male involved sex is rape, as per Andrea Dworkin. They will be permitted to masturbate to internet porn or have a sex robot, but no human intimate contact.
 
Once men are banned from sex, many more will become transgender and pretend to be women so they can have lesbian sex.

That's basically the plan. Come back in 20 or 30 years and show me I was wrong. I dare you.
 
Would you mind if I sat on your face for an hour?

I support this. Are you sitting on his face currently and that's why we've not had any response? Can you make it MORE than an hour?

Lck probably hoped and may have expected the two women he showed his penis to in private were not going to say anything in public.

The married women and mothers here showing their bodies and saying various things on this public, insecure web site probably also mistakenly believe nobody will go public with their improprieties on their local craigslist or local bulliten board.

If that happened to you, would you feel you should lose your career, marriage, children, etc?

Or should all people mind their own business?



Also, the men being destroyed are not the handsome ones.

Is it only the ugly men starlets resent sleeping with to build their careers?

Or is it just not a “crime” to shag a director you like?

Does the coin have one side or two?

What then is “equality”?

So that's what you're doing now with your free time? Sounds pretty lame. I almost liked the faux stories about "young nubiles" and the Vespa better.
 
Didn't stop Bill Clinton from achieving the White House nor keep Wilbur Mills and Ted Kennedy out of the Congress.
Nor did it prevent Trump being elected.

When Moore is elected in Alabama the republican hypocrites now saying he should step down will change their tune just like they did for Trump, who actually bragged about committing sexual assault, unlike Moore who merely has an unprovable accusation against him.
 
...As usual with you, in the end the left gets the blame no matter what. Even when it’s a right wing nut job caressing fourteen year olds. Okey dokey.

Oh lookie, its Roar-Wee! He accepts the Washington Post story which has zero evidence whatsoever as fact with no questioning because it validates his hate of family values moral conservatives like Judge Moore. Is anyone surprised? :rolleyes:
 
Once men are banned from sex, many more will become transgender and pretend to be women so they can have lesbian sex.

That's basically the plan. Come back in 20 or 30 years and show me I was wrong. I dare you.

The problem with your theory is that lesbians tend to not be all that sexually open-minded about gender. They prefer cis-gendered women. Same as heterosexual men.
 
Whatever happened to manners? Once upon a time, people would ask someone if they would like dinner, a movie, maybe a picnic, to get to know them and get an idea as to whether or not there's a mutual attraction.
Now people think it's fine to just grab a handful and/request specific sex acts before ever having had a conversation.
 
Nor did it prevent Trump being elected.

When Moore is elected in Alabama the republican hypocrites now saying he should step down will change their tune just like they did for Trump, who actually bragged about committing sexual assault, unlike Moore who merely has an unprovable accusation against him.

Trump never bragged about "assaulting""anyone

What was said, exactly? Do we have to go listen again? He NEVER said he "assaulted" anyone. He never said that there was anything unconsensual. In fact he never specifically said anything, other than trying to get a married woman in bed.

On what basis do you make the jump that "grabbing someone by the pussy" is assault? Perhaps the same basis that making a joke about Russia finding Hillary's lost e-mails was "calling for Russia to illegally hack the DNC"? You people hear what you want to hear and fill inthe details to fit your factless hatreds and prejudices.
 
Penetrating with a foreign object is your criterion for being a pervert...? :rolleyes:

The most powerful man on Earth using a young and naive intern for his personal humidor in which to steep his cigars is a bit out of the ordinary, doncha think?:rolleyes:
 
(edited)
We have an entire generation now raised with the understanding that the boss getting it on with an intern is a private sexual matter.
Yeah, that's only been happening for a few thousand years.
 
Nor did it prevent Trump being elected.

When Moore is elected in Alabama the republican hypocrites now saying he should step down will change their tune just like they did for Trump, who actually bragged about committing sexual assault, unlike Moore who merely has an unprovable accusation against him.

Did Trump say his advances were uninvited?
 
Whatever happened to manners? Once upon a time, people would ask someone if they would like dinner, a movie, maybe a picnic, to get to know them and get an idea as to whether or not there's a mutual attraction.
Now people think it's fine to just grab a handful and/request specific sex acts before ever having had a conversation.

Times change. Grabbing pussy, any fair minded listening would assume, is figurative. Its not literal.

In the real world, women, at least until they are over the hill, can have sex anytime they want. The difficultly is finding a relationship with someone they want. Free, casual sex with almost any guy is available to them, but most of them don't want that. Its biology.

Males on the other hand, except for gays, grow up mostly starved for sex along with a sex drive 4 to 10 times stronger on average than women. There are about roughly 10% of males who can get easy sex. My friend back in the day was one of the 10%. We would be amazed. Babes would approach him, at least half the time he went home with a new girl after a night out at the bar. Even he struck out at least half the time though. Women can't even relate to this, as sex is so easy for them to get, at least with men (more difficult for lesbians of course).

Trump was simply saying once your a celeb you automatically become part of that 10% who get it about half the time from anyone you want. That's what being able to grab em by the pussy means. Not "assault."
 
Back
Top