Steve Scalise Shot

Ah yes, Madonna. The person without whose permission "the left" dares not make a move. :rolleyes:

and YOU, are a VILE murderous CREATURE.....Like the SKANK HOZEon CNN

who went on TEE VEE to lie and INCITE VIOLENCE with FAKE NEWS

http://cdn.newsbusters.org/styles/blog_body-100/s3/images/CNN%20Newsroom-HandsUpDontShoot-Dec13-b_0.jpg



YOU had an ORGAZMICK FIT when you screamed

THE WHITES ARE BOMBING THE NAACP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!....hoping to advance violence

and you had no decency to ever retract the LIE

YOU ARE A VILE EVIL CREATURE
 
There is no legal 'militia' in the US other than the National Guard unless you count the US armed forces in general. Any bunch of rednecks in various wooded encampments playin' soldier boy are just that.

Lol, keep deluding yourself. The law is the law and just because you don't like it or agree with it doesn't make it vanish.

The unorganized militia may not have fancy uniforms and have weekend meetings each month. But they are well trained and have their own arms and are familiar with their use. If necessary they WILL stand up and defend this Nation.

Interestingly enough, that also includes you and yours, so perhaps a bit of respect for their willingness to do what you won't would be better than ignorance and hate and bashing.
 
There is no legal 'militia' in the US other than the National Guard unless you count the US armed forces in general. Any bunch of rednecks in various wooded encampments playin' soldier boy are just that.

Not true actually. 10 U.S. Code § 246

But even with the modern nature of the US military, current US law still maintains a militia classification structure. It’s quite broad…

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.

(b) The classes of the militia are—

(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and

(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

But given the question’s reference to events underway in Oregon, and following on Dexter's answer, whether any group of citizens may come together and define themselves as a duly organized citizen’s militia is, frankly, a grey area. Few States have any mechanisms to legally recognize such groups as organized militias – which usually require some kind of command structure from the Governor on down – but nor can they be forcefully broken up in the absence of criminal activity.

They’re basically legal by virtue of being not explicitly illegal. But to consider that any of them would ever be called on by authorities in the event of a State or National emergency, though, which may have the effect of recognizing them as agents of the State as may be provided by law, would be far-fetched.

https://www.quora.com/Are-US-militia-legal-according-to-the-Constitution

So it ain't as if you're exactly wrong. Only nit picky so. ;)
 
America's existing problems are simply a continuation of what Obama started & are being continued by a vindictive mainstream media with the blessings for Schumer, Pelosi, et al.

Because everything was goodness and light, and no social or economic problems existed before Obama. Right.:rolleyes:
 
Your original claim was that a militia seeks only to protect. Would you like a list of violent, extremist militias?

Why yes I would.

I presume you are going to include the Black Panthers and the SLA on that list, among similar groups.

Be aware that terrorists groups are not "The Militia". No more than Black Lives Matter is.
 
The unorganized militia may not have fancy uniforms and have weekend meetings each month. But they are well trained and have their own arms and are familiar with their use. If necessary they WILL stand up and defend this Nation.

And if they do, they'll be taken down like Oregon, Ruby Ridge, Waco, et al.
 
WE’RE GOING TO BE SEEING A LOT OF THIS IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS: MSNBC Analyst Who Called for Terrorist Attack on Trump Hotel Now Bashing Guns for Today’s Shooting.
 
When the left starts pushing for gun control, the right needs to start pushing for federal concealed carry laws.

p.s. Did you guys hear about the Navy Destroyer named after Gabbie Giffords?

Also no one has mentioned: Madonna talking about blowing up the white house,
Snoop Dog shooting Trump, and that video of the high school teacher pretending to shoot Trump in her class in front of a room of students.

Maybe we have too many wacky liberals.
 
Lumping me in with the shooter! Cool. You're clearly coming from a place of rhetorical strength.

His facebook feed is quite likely the same as yours. He and you would be LESS politically alligned with Pence than Trump.

Deciding to distance yourself from the shooter does not change the fact that yes, Virginia, your ideology is as a matter of fact coincident with the shooter's. Which is the only way I "lumped you in" with the shooter. The rest of it is just your guilty conscience at work.
 
This is not "violence from the left." There was no "killing and slaughtering." Stop lying and twisting reality to fit your talking points.

This was an extremist nutjob who committed an act of political violence. Thank god no one else died. It is my belief that until the political and social climate improves, this will keep happening. I think it would be a great improvement if our president were not a corrupt, lying maniac whose favorite pastimes include twitter, nepotism, and nursing grudges. Only a fool, hypocrite, or coward would disagree.



Haha! You don't even have the willpower to skip one post from me. Brave, strong man. Do you have a cool marines nightlight? Or maybe ninja turtles??



Lumping me in with the shooter! Cool. You're clearly coming from a place of rhetorical strength.

You can probably count on one hand how many of your puny attacks I've fielded. This is my thread.
 
Oh look. Another man with emotional self control issues and a gun.

Surprise!

Mental health issues. They're a thing.
 
Why yes I would.

I presume you are going to include the Black Panthers and the SLA on that list, among similar groups.

Be aware that terrorists groups are not "The Militia". No more than Black Lives Matter is.

Well, I'm not going to do all your homework for you, but here are a couple examples.

Congolese militia

Violence in Central African Republic

More to the point, a militia can be understood to sometimes be "a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army."
 
And if they do, they'll be taken down like Oregon, Ruby Ridge, Waco, et al.

No they won't.

Oklahoma City is why the Feds packed up their play toys and went home in the Bundy incident.

Admitedly, if Clinton had won, she likely would have provoked the second Amercan Civil war.

As you found out today, the left is under-equipped and ill-trained.
 
I also like this new "you didn't DENOUNCE it so you support it!" bullshit.

How fucked up do you have to be assume that if you don't say "that was bad" every time something horrible happens, you support it? What kind of ugly world are you living in, and what kind of ugly people are you listening to?

Well, I listen to CNN among other outlets and I have yet to hear any of the Democratic leadership denounce BLM for their riots. Or denounce the Berkeley riots. Or the cop killings. Or the current attack in Alexandria.

Amazing the silence from the left when violence in their name is done. Or, if they DO speak, it's to say things like "well, they deserved it."
 
Well, I'm not going to do all your homework for you, but here are a couple examples.

Congolese militia

Violence in Central African Republic

More to the point, a militia can be understood to sometimes be "a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army."

Welcome back, Oreo.

None of that is on point. That is not what a militia is as defined by our documents. we are specifically to have no standing army and we are to make up an army as needed out of the militiam
 
Welcome back, Oreo.

None of that is on point. That is not what a militia is as defined by our documents. we are specifically to have no standing army and we are to make up an army as needed out of the militiam

If you want to trade on a specific mention of militia, make it explicit. Otherwise you're just hiding behind equivocation.
 
Well, I listen to CNN among other outlets and I have yet to hear any of the Democratic leadership denounce BLM for their riots. Or denounce the Berkeley riots. Or the cop killings. Or the current attack in Alexandria.

Amazing the silence from the left when violence in their name is done. Or, if they DO speak, it's to say things like "well, they deserved it."

PussyPelosi actually said GOD BLESS THEM
 
Back
Top