Classified reports have ‘damning evidence’ of Trump campaign’s coordination with Russ

[hashtag34]

OMFG

Everyone in Washington hates Trump including the Republicans.

Begin here and here.

I just started watching the 2nd link provided, and saw the accusations of connections to Russian Mafia and money laundering.
If these are true: wow. If not: wow again.

The Dubious Friends of Donald Trump
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1nf0K713Zv4

"The 45-minute documentary was produced by Zembla TV and examines Trump’s alleged relationship with Russian mobster Felix Sater — which Trump reportedly took pains to hide from regulators.
Powerful billionaires suspected of money laundering and fraud, and of having contacts in Moscow and with the mafia."

Here are the real stories the MSM and the Deep State don't want you to know about:
John Solomon and Sarah Carter are the primary reporters breaking this story. They can be found here:
http://circa.com/politics/declassif...ed-spy-data-on-americans-with-private-parties

Links to breaking stories that should concern all Americans:
http://circa.com/politics/barack-ob...s-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...hared-secret-intel-americans-private-parties/
https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/icotr/51117/2016_Cert_FISC_Memo_Opin_Order_Apr_2017.pdf

Same goes for Obama + those newssites who reported these stories:

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-ob...s-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

Leaked Documents On Spying Show Former FBI Director Comey Shared Secret Intel on Americans with Private Parties
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...hared-secret-intel-americans-private-parties/

 

[Colonel Hogan]

"Looks" are subjective and not conclusive evidence of wrongdoing.

Which is precisely why we investigate things.

Without evidence and probable cause, the investigation turns out to be a witch hunt.

Hold on, RG. Categorizing EVERY investigation as a "witch hunt" is as guilty of hyperbole as those who have already condemned Trump as being guilty of collusion.

There are certainly witch hunters out there. There are more than ample numbers of folks who want to bring Trump down who don't give an ounce of shit if he is guilty of anything.

At the same time, we know that the Russians hacked the DNC email servers and that the contents of that hacking was publicly exposed through Wikileaks. It seems imminently reasonable for the United States intelligence agencies and the FBI to investigate that activity and determine if any U. S. citizens assisted in that operation and that, if they did, any U. S. laws were broken.

With the possible exception of Michael Flynn, I'll be surprised if that turns out to be true. But the investigations should be allowed to run their course.

 

[hashtag34]

Maybe Melania was a russian sleeper agent.
(She grew up in a Communist country afterall, country that still has ties to Russia)

And she fvcked her way into the White House in order to get hold of the nukes.

 

[Conager]

But firing someone who is investigating you or your advisers, then replacing him with someone who may be less inclined to do so since you just gave them a good job, sure looks like trying to impede the process.

Endlessly "investigating" (without any specific charge or allegation) your boss who replaced your previous boss whose adminstration you colluded with to protect his preferred succesor looks like a way to keep your job by making it to fire you for your well-documented malfeasance and despite bipartisan (for varying reasons) calls for your dismissal.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

OMFG



I just started watching the 2nd link provided, and saw the accusations of connections to Russian Mafia and money laundering.
If these are true: wow. If not: wow again.

The Dubious Friends of Donald Trump
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1nf0K713Zv4

"The 45-minute documentary was produced by Zembla TV and examines Trump’s alleged relationship with Russian mobster Felix Sater — which Trump reportedly took pains to hide from regulators.
Powerful billionaires suspected of money laundering and fraud, and of having contacts in Moscow and with the mafia."





Same goes for Obama + those newssites who reported these stories:

Obama intel agency secretly conducted illegal searches on Americans for years
http://circa.com/politics/barack-ob...s-of-illegal-nsa-searches-spying-on-americans

Leaked Documents On Spying Show Former FBI Director Comey Shared Secret Intel on Americans with Private Parties
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...hared-secret-intel-americans-private-parties/

Hey, Hash, do you own any shares of stock or mutual funds with investments in American corporations? How about insurance policies or annuities? Bank deposits?

If so, have you thoroughly investigated the officers of those corporations for any prior criminal charges or conflicts of interest prior to having made your investments?

No? Gee, me neither. Maybe you, me and the President can all share a prison cell together.

Because that's the "case" the Zembla documentary is attempting to make.

 

[Conager]

Hey, Hash, do you own any shares of stock or mutual funds with investments in American corporations? How about insurance policies or annuities? Bank deposits?

If so, have you thoroughly investigated the officers of those corporations for any prior criminal charges or conflicts of interest prior to having made your investments?

No? Gee, me neither. Maybe you, me and the President can all share a prison cell together.

Because that's the "case" the Zembla documentary is attempting to make.

And all of this needs to be viewed in light of the idea that it was decided to put together a fake dossier on Donald Trump strictly to distract from bribes from actual Russians with actual Russian intelligence ties paid to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for the Clinton State Department allowing the sale of urianium reserves in the Uranium One dea. (Bizzarely, how could she be empowered to hold up a pipeline- how is that the bidinrss of State?)

No one disinterested in the Urianium One scandal has any credibility on the "lets look into Trump and the RUSSIANS!!!"

 

[Desiremakesmeweak]

Quote Colonel Hogan (no canned laughter tracks please)"At the same time, we know that the Russians hacked the DNC email servers and that the contents of that hacking was publicly exposed through Wikileaks."

No I don't think we do know that. I think the time-line being constructed by the journalist who exposed Guccifer 2:0 shows that Crowdstrike, a US contractor concerned with computer and internet security, suggested that Russia hacked the DNC archived files - and their claims have been subject to a lot of questions since they were the ones who originally claimed Russia had stolen mobile missiles from the Ukraine, and then falsified videos appearing to show these systems being transported, a claim which they have since been forced to withdraw.


The only fact we know for absolute sure is that Crowdstrike have the Hillary Clinton archived files and have seen them - and that the FBI requested the DNC to show them to the FBI and this request has up till now been rejected with Crowdstrike being the only people who have ever seen the hard-drives and actual archived emails.

No government official report has made a determination that the Russians hacked anyone, with the CIA saying only that they have a strong belief that the Russians hack US government computers possibly routinely but they have no uncontested evidence for holding the belief and have explicitly said they have no hard evidence to base the belief upon but strong suspicions.

Crowdstrike is not a politically independent entity and is tied to the DNC. There are bombshells that lie in waiting concerning Crowdstrike and who really owns them and establishes their policy, and also who is behind 'Carter Page' the other 'left field' character who manages to taint every hundred mile drive past of the Trump Towers that he makes with some 'Russia connection' narrative whilst all the time singing his song about how he is NOT the Trump-Russia connection collusion/connection and denying that he is even that close to Trump even though he goes around loudly self-proclaiming to have been a Trump campaign adviser at some stage, AND that he has excellent top-level Russian contacts! Carter Page is an amazing guy - he can do, and not do, all at the exact same time.

Crowdstrike is covertly owned. The same person who owns Crowdstrike employs Carter Page. And it is not George Soros but it certainly is a 'banker world' person previously VERY closely associated with both Clintons and Obama.

The Russia narrative is a strategy and a conspiracy against the Trump Team.

It is likely to come badly unstuck as soon as Crowdstrike is more exposed by the various oversight committees working on it right now.

 

[Rightguide]

Nobody runs the Federal Bureau of Investigations right now?

Comey wasn't running them either, investigators within the FBI are investigating, as they are now, under the authority of the acting FBI Director.

 

[Liar]

Comey wasn't running them either, investigators within the FBI are investigating, as they are now, under the authority of the acting FBI Director.

I know, dude. That was not the point.

 

[Adre]

Endlessly "investigating" (without any specific charge or allegation) your boss who replaced your previous boss whose adminstration you colluded with to protect his preferred succesor looks like a way to keep your job by making it to fire you for your well-documented malfeasance and despite bipartisan (for varying reasons) calls for your dismissal.

As I stated earlier, if a major player in the affair takes the Fifth and refuses to provide requested documents, and was fired by his boss for lying to the VP of the US...there actually is something there to investigate further. Whether you like it or not.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Quote Colonel Hogan (no canned laughter tracks please)"At the same time, we know that the Russians hacked the DNC email servers and that the contents of that hacking was publicly exposed through Wikileaks."

No I don't think we do know that. I think the time-line being constructed by the journalist who exposed Guccifer 2:0 shows that Crowdstrike, a US contractor concerned with computer and internet security, suggested that Russia hacked the DNC archived files - and their claims have been subject to a lot of questions since they were the ones who originally claimed Russia had stolen mobile missiles from the Ukraine, and then falsified videos appearing to show these systems being transported, a claim which they have since been forced to withdraw.


The only fact we know for absolute sure is that Crowdstrike have the Hillary Clinton archived files and have seen them - and that the FBI requested the DNC to show them to the FBI and this request has up till now been rejected with Crowdstrike being the only people who have ever seen the hard-drives and actual archived emails.

No government official report has made a determination that the Russians hacked anyone, with the CIA saying only that they have a strong belief that the Russians hack US government computers possibly routinely but they have no uncontested evidence for holding the belief and have explicitly said they have no hard evidence to base the belief upon but strong suspicions.

Crowdstrike is not a politically independent entity and is tied to the DNC. There are bombshells that lie in waiting concerning Crowdstrike and who really owns them and establishes their policy, and also who is behind 'Carter Page' the other 'left field' character who manages to taint every hundred mile drive past of the Trump Towers that he makes with some 'Russia connection' narrative whilst all the time singing his song about how he is NOT the Trump-Russia connection collusion/connection and denying that he is even that close to Trump even though he goes around loudly self-proclaiming to have been a Trump campaign adviser at some stage, AND that he has excellent top-level Russian contacts! Carter Page is an amazing guy - he can do, and not do, all at the exact same time.

Crowdstrike is covertly owned. The same person who owns Crowdstrike employs Carter Page. And it is not George Soros but it certainly is a 'banker world' person previously VERY closely associated with both Clintons and Obama.

The Russia narrative is a strategy and a conspiracy against the Trump Team.

It is likely to come badly unstuck as soon as Crowdstrike is more exposed by the various oversight committees working on it right now.

From Wiki:

The company gained recognition for providing threat intelligence and attribution to nation state actors conducting economic espionage and IP theft. This includes the outing of state-sponsored Chinese group, Putter Panda, linked to China's spying on US defense and European satellite and aerospace industries. In May 2014, supported by CrowdStrike’s reports, the US Department of Justice charged five Chinese military hackers for economic cyber espionage against US corporations. Similarly, the firm is known for uncovering the activities of Energetic Bear, an adversary group with a nexus to the Russian Federation that conducts intelligence operations against a variety of global victims with a primary focus on the energy sector.

Following the very public Sony Pictures hack, CrowdStrike produced attribution to the government of North Korea within 48 hours and demonstrated how the attack was carried out step-by-step. On May 2015, the company released Researcher Jason Geffner's discovery of VENOM, a critical flaw in open source hypervisor called Quick Emulator (QEMU), which is used in a number of common virtualization products.

In 2014, the company launched the Falcon platform, a technology that stops breaches by combining next-generation antivirus, endpoint detection and response, and proactive hunting. Also in 2014, CrowdStrike was instrumental in identifying members of PLA Unit 61486 as the perpetrators of a number of cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure.

************

On March 20, 2017 during testimony before congress, James Comey stated "Crowdstrike, Mandiant, and ThreatConnect review[ed] the evidence of the hack and conclude[d] with high certainty that it was the work of APT 28 and APT 29 who are known to be Russian intelligence services."

So two other contractors also implicated Russian involvement.

Finally, the fact that CrowdStrike is privately owned hardly equates to covert. Two of its original owner/founders, George Kurtz (CEO) and Dmitri Alperovitch (CTO), still serve on the board of directors.

 

[VeraBad]

Blackwater/Pence/Russia

And now for Eric Prince's Blackwater/Russia/Mike Pence connection from WAPO...

http://www.dailykos.com/stories/201...Shows-The-Role-Of-Eric-Prince-In-Trump-Russia

 

[water505]

Everyone in Washington hates Trump including the Republicans.
].

Everyone here hates you including yourself.

 

[water505]

I think we are skimming over the salient point to all of this. The Left, the Democrats, the Deep State and the Liberal media are not looking to make a legal case. They don't care if anyone is ever charged with a crime. This is a symbiotic political attack designed, like that character in Lil' Abner to maintain a permanent black cloud over the Administration in order to achieve two objectives, the first being to keep the Administration wounded by playing defense to "serious charges" (thank Allah that they're finally lawyering up and I hope the stop addressing the charges altogether) and to keep their voting base wound up, angry and visibly making vapid displays of outrage for the consumption (and pontificating) of news entertainment shows. If anyone doubts me, look at their recent ratings...

The left's relentless attempts to discredit and destroy the administration wasn't unexpected. They would have done the exact same thing (or worse) to any Republican who beat Clinton in November. They're creating a perfect scenario for another leftist savior to come riding in on horseback to save the country through bureaucratic regulation and executive order, and Congress will be powerless to stop them. Rule of law will diminish even further and make every government employee immune to the silly rules other Americans are required to follow.

The next president will make Obama's disastrous regime appear to be nothing more than a blip on the radar. Then all they'll need is a scapegoat.

We ain't seen nuthin yet.

 

[Adre]

The left's relentless attempts to discredit and destroy the administration wasn't unexpected. They would have done the exact same thing (or worse) to any Republican who beat Clinton in November. They're creating a perfect scenario for another leftist savior to come riding in on horseback to save the country through bureaucratic regulation and executive order, and Congress will be powerless to stop them. Rule of law will diminish even further and make every government employee immune to the silly rules other Americans are required to follow.

The next president will make Obama's disastrous regime appear to be nothing more than a blip on the radar. Then all they'll need is a scapegoat.

We ain't seen nuthin yet.

Nice try making Trump seem like the victim, you guys do victimhood well. The simple truth is he's brought nearly everything down upon himself. Dumb tweets, dumb gestures, dumb comments, dumb appointments, dumb policy positions, dumb promises. Take his stupid comment about German trade regarding cars. Someone needs to tell him that foreign companies manufacture 5.5 million cars...wait for it...right here in the United States!

 

[Conager]

As I stated earlier, if a major player in the affair takes the Fifth and refuses to provide requested documents, and was fired by his boss for lying to the VP of the US...there actually is something there to investigate further. Whether you like it or not.

Taking the fifth is not evidence of anything. Last I checked, per the 4th amendment we also have the right to secure our papers unless and until a court says otherwise.

I'm just telling ypu how it "looks" since you put eeight on that aspect yourself. It looks like Comey was creating job security for himself and maintaining control over records oc his malfeadance.

Is Comey going to take the fifth? as soon as he left the employ of the United States government all of his work product papers and everything that transpired while he was under the employ of the United States government is property of the United States government. Congress has oversight and unfettered access to such papers. Why is it that the FBI will not turn over comey's papers? What are they trying to hide?

This doesm't LOOK good. There is clearly something here to investigate.

despite the fact that the Clinton Foundation was under criminal investigation how why is it that that never went anywhere. Comey never came out and announced that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Bill and Hillary Clinton for colluding with the Russians and others through the Clinton foundation and the state department.

Ooh look thete I just made actual allegations, unlike the fanyasyy about the Rusdian/trump campsign with no evidence and no actual allegations.

but it sure is fun to announce the Trump Administration is under investigation.

Why wasn't the Obama Administration ever under investigation for actual felonies committed during the Fast and Furious operation?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Nice try making Trump seem like the victim, you guys do victimhood well. The simple truth is he's brought nearly everything down upon himself. Dumb tweets, dumb gestures, dumb comments, dumb appointments, dumb policy positions, dumb promises. Take his stupid comment about German trade regarding cars. Someone needs to tell him that foreign companies manufacture 5.5 million cars...wait for it...right here in the United States!

Let's face it. People were calling for Trumps impeachment even in December, a month before he was inaugurated.

https://trumpimpeachment.co/2016/12/

 

[VeraBad]

Let's face it. People were calling for Trumps impeachment even in December, a month before he was inaugurated.

https://trumpimpeachment.co/2016/12/

It would have saved a lot of money in the long run.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxlicker101 View Post

Let's face it. People were calling for Trumps impeachment even in December, a month before he was inaugurated.

https://trumpimpeachment.co/2016/12/

It would have saved a lot of money in the long run.

It would hare resulted in a Constitutional crisis. Unless this changed recently, there is no way to replace a president-elect. Additionally, how can you impeach a person who holds no office? It might have been possible for the lame-duck H of R to have begun the process, but I don't believe it would have been legal.

 

[magicalmoments]

Maybe Melania was a russian sleeper agent.
(She grew up in a Communist country afterall, country that still has ties to Russia)

And she fvcked her way into the White House in order to get hold of the nukes.

It's funny you should mention that, we were discussing that possibility in NZ.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Moscow may have been actively on the prowl for compromising information on Trump during his presidential campaign.

 

[Conager]

I'm shocked absolutely shocked I tell you to hear that the Russian intelligence services are actively looking for things that may compromise one of their enemies.

Probably a good thing that they aren't able to hold the details of the uranium one deal over the president's head.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Moscow may have been actively on the prowl for compromising information on Trump during his presidential campaign.

Gee, that hardly seems like a sporting way to treat someone with whom you are "colluding."

 

[Lancecastor]

There's a Red in his bed!


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2017/03/01/05/3DCFD7E100000578-4270090-Ivanka_Trump_matched_her_stepmother_Melania_on_Tuesday_as_the_tw-a-35_1488346256383.jpg

 

[phrodeau]

I'm shocked absolutely shocked I tell you to hear that the Russian intelligence services are actively looking for things that may compromise one of their enemies.

Probably a good thing that they aren't able to hold the details of the uranium one deal over the president's head.

The uranium one deal? Wasn't President Obama grilled over the coals for that? How could the Republican-controlled Congress let him get away with it?

What is the uranium one deal, anyways?