Weak men more likely to be socialist, strong men more likely to be capitalist

[james_1957]

A new study from Brunel University London found that physically weaker men are more apt to believe in socialist policies, such as redistribution of wealth. Meanwhile, stronger men are more geared to believe in the capitalist concepts, such as the idea that people should keep what you earn.

Brunel University academics studied 171 men aged 18 – 40, examining their overall physical strength, bicep circumference, weight, and height. They also noted the amount of time each individual spent at a gym, and examined these variables in light of whether they subscribed more to capitalist or socialist ideologies. They found that the more physically strong the men were, the less they believed in socialist policies, and the more they believed certain social groups should be dominant.

The findings of the Brunel study somewhat match results previously found in a similar 2013 study done by Aarhus University in Denmark. Researchers studied hundreds of men from America, Denmark, and Brazil, using the same criteria Brunel had used, and found that stronger men “take a conservative stance of protecting their own interests,” according to the Telegraph.

“Our results demonstrate that physically weak males are more reluctant than physically strong males to assert their self-interest – just as if disputes over national policies were a matter of direct physical confrontation among small numbers of individuals, rather than abstract electoral dynamics among millions,” said Michael Bang Petersen, who lead the Aarhus University study.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

 

[rocket_surgery]

Most of the guys at the gym are gay and strong enough to bend steel and gay men tend to be very left leaning.
Just saying.

 

[bb4ever]

https://giphy.com/gifs/dad-bod-VoGz9KMNV9pPq

 

[lovecraft68]

weak men more likely to be right wing republican, strong men more likely to be liberal as far as women's rights go.

Why?

because weak men seek to control women because strong women scare them. Conservative and religious men are the weakest of all touting some type of fairy tale that women should be under men.

Anyway, back to point one. Right wing men=gutless and most likely to be misogynistic and abusive-but only to women because men will beat their asses-and in general full of low self esteem and spinelessness that they need to mask by bossing women around.

 

[handysr]

It figures...

When the study outcome has anything to do with "manly men do 'abc'" and "girly men do 'xyz'", there is no surprise to these comments. Everyone here thinks they are the 'real man', and everyone else is weak of mind and body.

The study does say "most", not "all". My personal experience says the results sound fairly accurate, at least according to the summary provided here.

 

[PleasePeesMe]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

What utter bollocks.

 

[coldblooded]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

And I would venture that if they had tested IQ and protection-ism, the "weaker" males would have ~20+ points higher and show more compassion/desire to protect all members of the group over the "stronger" males...

 

[adrina]

The Blaze. Of course.

 

[pointless]

if you google it and read the article from the university itself you find out that it was actually about gym rat, jock assholes being assholes and not weak men suck, strong men awesome.

so, yeah, the blaze.

 

[spacekowboy]

Look at the cunt what posted the thread. That tells you all you need to know.

 

[OldJourno]

And I would venture that if they had tested IQ and protection-ism, the "weaker" males would have ~20+ points higher and show more compassion/desire to protect all members of the group over the "stronger" males...

Yes, compassion by taking money someone has earned and giving it to someone else.

 

[hashtag34]

weak men more likely to be right wing republican, strong men more likely to be liberal as far as women's rights go.

Why?

because weak men seek to control women because strong women scare them. Conservative and religious men are the weakest of all touting some type of fairy tale that women should be under men.

Anyway, back to point one. Right wing men=gutless and most likely to be misogynistic and abusive-but only to women because men will beat their asses-and in general full of low self esteem and spinelessness that they need to mask by bossing women around.

I don't live in the States, therefore I might be out of the loop with many things.
Or: it might well be that american R wingers are trying to get society back to how things were 60 years ago.

But tbh, I'm perpetually perplexed by the GB claims about overall gender inequality and lack of women's rights in the Western world.
Yes, there are still pockets of misogyny in certain parts of society, and incidents of domestic abuse that need to be addressed, but imo overall Europe and Commonwealth countries are pretty egalitarian societies.

.

 

[hashtag34]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

Amount of time spent in the gym?
Maybe that points out to a person who's more self-absorbed, and more interested in building their biceps instead of doing other things?

N.B. - just making fun of the study

 

[magicalmoments]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

So... The point of sharing this is?

 

[james_1957]

So... The point of sharing this is?

Let's see...

You're a socialist, that makes you a weak man

You're from New Zealand, that means you enjoy wearing women's skirts

So...you're a weak man that enjoys wearing women's skirts

You must be quite a catch!

 

[james_1957]

Look at the cunt what posted the thread. That tells you all you need to know.

San Diego is a beautiful city

I was surprised to learn it has a trailer park

Have you upgraded to a double wide yet?

 

[Rightguide]

Probably true, we all know that today's snowflakes couldn't have founded, claimed, trailblazed, and accomplished the manifest destiny of the United States let alone defend it and the rest of the free world. That would be a job for an exceptional people, not a bunch of scaredy cats that can't face down free speech.

 

[Disgustipated]

Probably true, we all know that today's snowflakes couldn't have founded, claimed, trailblazed, and accomplished the manifest destiny of the United States let alone defend it and the rest of the free world. That would be a job for an exceptional people, not a bunch of scaredy cats that can't face down free speech.

• You whined about s black man ruining your life.
• You threatened another Litster with physical (lol) harm.
• You no-showed at said fight.

The threat makes you a coward - the no-show makes you a lying cunt.

​

 

[water505]

^^Applies to physical, emotional, and mental weakness.

 

[Disgustipated]

^^Applies to physical, emotional, and mental weakness.

^^^cried to Laurel to delete his "miles" account because he's a cowardly little snowflake.

 

[Rightguide]

^^Applies to physical, emotional, and mental weakness.

Seriously, disgustedlyconstipated and many others here are certifiable mental basket cases. I have never seen such friggin paranoia. Everyone is a former member coming back to haunt them. it's really pathetic.

 

[hashtag34]

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/0...list-strong-men-more-likely-to-be-capitalist/

I wouldn't consider this to be the best analogy.

Right wingers have their own faults, of course such as intolerance or racism. They're often not too great either.
But as far as leftists are concerned:

Imo, leftists (those who call themselves, without any merit "liberals") are often willing to trade and betray one's cultural heritage and even national sovereignty, in their pursuit of some globalist- corporatist ideology.
They're often anti -patriotic

 

[water505]

Seriously, disgustedlyconstipated and many others here are certifiable mental basket cases. :

Basket case? No.

More like a full bucket of shit.

Watch him have the last word...5...4...3...

 

[Conager]

weak men more likely to be right wing republican, strong men more likely to be liberal as far as women's rights go.

Why?

because weak men seek to control women because strong women scare them. Conservative and religious men are the weakest of all touting some type of fairy tale that women should be under men.

Anyway, back to point one. Right wing men=gutless and most likely to be misogynistic and abusive-but only to women because men will beat their asses-and in general full of low self esteem and spinelessness that they need to mask by bossing women around.

That's the third time you've strutted that out here in as many days. Being the internet tough guy that you are you have ignored commentary on how your mansplaining for the women partnered to consevative men are being dismissed in your flawed reasoning.

I always sense a gradping hope that this sort of empty virtue-signaling is simply the leftist's idea of a mating dsnce. Does it work?

 

[handysr]

I wouldn't consider this to be the best analogy.

Right wingers have their own faults, of course such as intolerance or racism. They're often not too great either.
But as far as leftists are concerned:

Imo, leftists (those who call themselves, without any merit "liberals") are often willing to trade and betray one's cultural heritage and even national sovereignty, in their pursuit of some globalist- corporatist ideology.
They're often anti -patriotic

Everyone has their faults, and I can't deny I have plenty of my own. What I consider to be one of the worst is to be unpatriotic. Those willing to throw away their culture to appease globalist shouldn't live in the country they're in. I love my country, even though the politicians are the worst part part of it.

Probably true, we all know that today's snowflakes couldn't have founded, claimed, trailblazed, and accomplished the manifest destiny of the United States let alone defend it and the rest of the free world. That would be a job for an exceptional people, not a bunch of scaredy cats that can't face down free speech.

The USA could *not* have been formed by the liberals currently living here. Not when it involved defeating the indigenous Indians, blazing trails at great personal risk, and trying to harness nature to sustain them.

I don't live in the States, therefore I might be out of the loop with many things.
Or: it might well be that american R wingers are trying to get society back to how things were 60 years ago.

But tbh, I'm perpetually perplexed by the GB claims about overall gender inequality and lack of women's rights in the Western world.
Yes, there are still pockets of misogyny in certain parts of society, and incidents of domestic abuse that need to be addressed, but imo overall Europe and Commonwealth countries are pretty egalitarian societies.

.

Thanks for that perspective, I totally agree. Compared to the places I've lived and visited, the amount of (extra) rights claimed by women and "minorities" are well above what other cultures have. Is it enough? Not for the feminazi and SJW crowd. They would have you believe they are truly discriminated against. Yes there is a small percent of assholes who are truly bigoted/racist/etc, but that won't be solved by more laws, it will only harden their resolve to be assholes. Trying to force someone to believe in someone else's mindset by fiat doesn't work.